國立虎尾科技大學 |

Merit, justice, and the political theory of academic knowledge production

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Merit, justice, and the political theory of academic knowledge production/ by Camilla Boisen, Matthew C. Murray.
作者:	Boisen, Camilla.
其他作者:	Murray, Matthew C.
出版者:	Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland : : 2024.,
面頁冊數:	ix, 133 p. :ill., digital ; : 24 cm.;
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Political Theory. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65498-5
ISBN:	9783031654985

Merit, justice, and the political theory of academic knowledge production
Boisen, Camilla.

Merit, justice, and the political theory of academic knowledge production[electronic resource] /by Camilla Boisen, Matthew C. Murray. - Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :2024. - ix, 133 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Chapter 1: Introduction: Why interrogate the Concept of Merit -- Chapter 2: Production and Politique: Establishing Academic Production as Political -- Chapter 3: Merit as Moral: Merit as Moral: Justifications for Applications of Power -- Chapter 4: The Merit Mythology: Merit as Natural Selection -- Chapter 5: Accepting Dissent, Resistance and Error -- Chapter 6: Relegating the Rule of Merit and Escaping 'Academic Fingertrap'.

Academia has long established itself as an institution of knowledge and ideas. Facing pressure, many academic fields and institutions have turned their attention, singularly and collectively, to the task of what to do to rectify the causes of under-representations both academic knowledge itself and who gets to be an academic producer of knowledge. Boisen and Murray argue that simply solving the contemporary symptoms of inequity in ideas, knowledge production and the academy is not enough. Political Theory must be used to analyze why dominant ideas and institutions, namely merit and the resulting meritocracy and meritocratic procedures, were given power in the first place. In using political theory and theories of justice, the book argues that academia must radically shift rather than procedurally reform these methods of evaluation in order to achieve a more coherent approach to diversity in ideas, academic knowledge producers and academic knowledge production, which are necessary to bring about other forms of social change and reform in our larger world. In questioning the ideals and the use of rival ideals to temper flawed concepts, the present motivations and justifications for producing academic knowledge can be relegated as political tools, allowing true meaningful reform. Boisen and Murray show how contemporary crises in academia around diversification of perspectives can only be solved by considering the justifications of academic knowledge production, and the inherent risk of retaining the established competitive and presumptively 'natural', but ultimately biased, methods of deriving academic authority. Camilla Boisen is a historian of political thought. She is Senior Lecturer of Writing and Associate Dean of Curricular Academic Planning for the Arts & Humanities at New York University, Abu Dhabi. Matthew C. Murray is the Assistant Director for Growthpolicy and Program Support at the Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. Matt runs the interdisciplinary research portal, Growthpolicy, supports the work of M-RCBG's other 18 programs, has 3 previous published titles along with academic articles and taught Philosophy at Providence College for a decade in the fields of Political and Social Philosophy, Ethics and Moral Philosophy.

ISBN: 9783031654985

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-65498-5doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

890169
Political Theory.

LC Class. No.: LB2322.2

Dewey Class. No.: 378.001

Merit, justice, and the political theory of academic knowledge production
LDR:03823nam a22003375a 4500 001 1135345
003 DE-He213
005 20240810124733.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 241213s2024 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031654985 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031654978 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-65498-5 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-65498-5
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a LB2322.2
072 7 $a JPA $2 bicssc
072 7 $a POL010000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JPA $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 378.001 $2 23
090 $a LB2322.2 $b .B682 2024
100 1 $a Boisen, Camilla. $3 1457042
245 1 0 $a Merit, justice, and the political theory of academic knowledge production $h [electronic resource] / $c by Camilla Boisen, Matthew C. Murray.
260 $a Cham : $c 2024. $b Springer Nature Switzerland : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan,
300 $a ix, 133 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
505 0 $a Chapter 1: Introduction: Why interrogate the Concept of Merit -- Chapter 2: Production and Politique: Establishing Academic Production as Political -- Chapter 3: Merit as Moral: Merit as Moral: Justifications for Applications of Power -- Chapter 4: The Merit Mythology: Merit as Natural Selection -- Chapter 5: Accepting Dissent, Resistance and Error -- Chapter 6: Relegating the Rule of Merit and Escaping 'Academic Fingertrap'.
520 $a Academia has long established itself as an institution of knowledge and ideas. Facing pressure, many academic fields and institutions have turned their attention, singularly and collectively, to the task of what to do to rectify the causes of under-representations both academic knowledge itself and who gets to be an academic producer of knowledge. Boisen and Murray argue that simply solving the contemporary symptoms of inequity in ideas, knowledge production and the academy is not enough. Political Theory must be used to analyze why dominant ideas and institutions, namely merit and the resulting meritocracy and meritocratic procedures, were given power in the first place. In using political theory and theories of justice, the book argues that academia must radically shift rather than procedurally reform these methods of evaluation in order to achieve a more coherent approach to diversity in ideas, academic knowledge producers and academic knowledge production, which are necessary to bring about other forms of social change and reform in our larger world. In questioning the ideals and the use of rival ideals to temper flawed concepts, the present motivations and justifications for producing academic knowledge can be relegated as political tools, allowing true meaningful reform. Boisen and Murray show how contemporary crises in academia around diversification of perspectives can only be solved by considering the justifications of academic knowledge production, and the inherent risk of retaining the established competitive and presumptively 'natural', but ultimately biased, methods of deriving academic authority. Camilla Boisen is a historian of political thought. She is Senior Lecturer of Writing and Associate Dean of Curricular Academic Planning for the Arts & Humanities at New York University, Abu Dhabi. Matthew C. Murray is the Assistant Director for Growthpolicy and Program Support at the Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. Matt runs the interdisciplinary research portal, Growthpolicy, supports the work of M-RCBG's other 18 programs, has 3 previous published titles along with academic articles and taught Philosophy at Providence College for a decade in the fields of Political and Social Philosophy, Ethics and Moral Philosophy.
650 1 4 $a Political Theory. $3 890169
650 0 $a Universities and colleges. $3 667257
650 0 $a Merit (Ethics) $3 969556
650 0 $a Education, Higher $x Philosophy. $3 580650
700 1 $a Murray, Matthew C. $3 860956
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65498-5
950 $a Political Science and International Studies (SpringerNature-41174)