國立虎尾科技大學 |

Rancière's counter-sociology = politics, history, education /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Rancière's counter-sociology/ by Jeremy F. Lane.
其他題名:	politics, history, education /
作者:	Lane, Jeremy F.
出版者:	Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland : : 2024.,
面頁冊數:	ix, 261 p. :ill., digital ; : 24 cm.;
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Critical Theory. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59880-7
ISBN:	9783031598807

Rancière's counter-sociology = politics, history, education /
Lane, Jeremy F.

Rancière's counter-sociologypolitics, history, education /[electronic resource] :by Jeremy F. Lane. - Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :2024. - ix, 261 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

1. Introduction -- 2. Sociology -- 3. Marxism -- 4. History -- 5. Education -- 6. Populism? -- 7. Conclusion.

Jacques Rancière is almost unique amongst contemporary thinkers in his consistent hostility to sociologically informed modes of interpretation. This hostility is not limited to his detailed critiques of Pierre Bourdieu-it characterises his thinking about politics, emancipation, democracy, history, aesthetics, and social class; it extends into a rejection of Marxist or marxisant modes of analysis. For Rancière's harshest critics, this hostility to sociology reflects an interpretative negligence on his part, an intellectual, political, or moral flaw. Even his more favorable commentators typically upbraid him for failing to specify the historical conditions of possibility of democratic emancipation. This book argues that such reactions are fundamentally mistaken and fail to grasp what is at stake in Rancière's rejection of sociological modes of enquiry. This rejection is attributable neither to his negligence nor to some moral flaw, and nor is it merely incidental to his thought. On the contrary, Rancière understands sociology to constitute a problematic, a set of assumptions and interpretative procedures whose blind spots must be identified and thought through in order that the possibility of intellectual and political emancipation, of democracy, and of history can be thought at all. Rancière's thought thus represents a counter-sociology and his rejection of the sociological problematic serves as the positive condition of possibility of his theory of democracy, equality, and emancipation. This new study both clarifies the nature of Rancière's critique of the sociological problematic and shows what his counter-sociology allows him to think in the domains of politics, history, and education. Jeremy F. Lane is Professor of French & Critical Theory in the Department of Modern Languages & Cultures at the University of Nottingham, UK.

ISBN: 9783031598807

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-59880-7doiSubjects--Personal Names:

1452976
Rancière, Jacques.
Subjects--Topical Terms:

1111035
Critical Theory.

LC Class. No.: B2433.R274

Dewey Class. No.: 194

Rancière's counter-sociology = politics, history, education /
LDR:02993nam a22003375a 4500 001 1135415
003 DE-He213
005 20240831130241.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 241213s2024 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031598807 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031598791 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-59880-7 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-59880-7
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a B2433.R274
072 7 $a HPC $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI031000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDH $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 194 $2 23
090 $a B2433.R274 $b L265 2024
100 1 $a Lane, Jeremy F. $3 1457142
245 1 0 $a Rancière's counter-sociology $h [electronic resource] : $b politics, history, education / $c by Jeremy F. Lane.
260 $a Cham : $c 2024. $b Springer Nature Switzerland : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan,
300 $a ix, 261 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
505 0 $a 1. Introduction -- 2. Sociology -- 3. Marxism -- 4. History -- 5. Education -- 6. Populism? -- 7. Conclusion.
520 $a Jacques Rancière is almost unique amongst contemporary thinkers in his consistent hostility to sociologically informed modes of interpretation. This hostility is not limited to his detailed critiques of Pierre Bourdieu-it characterises his thinking about politics, emancipation, democracy, history, aesthetics, and social class; it extends into a rejection of Marxist or marxisant modes of analysis. For Rancière's harshest critics, this hostility to sociology reflects an interpretative negligence on his part, an intellectual, political, or moral flaw. Even his more favorable commentators typically upbraid him for failing to specify the historical conditions of possibility of democratic emancipation. This book argues that such reactions are fundamentally mistaken and fail to grasp what is at stake in Rancière's rejection of sociological modes of enquiry. This rejection is attributable neither to his negligence nor to some moral flaw, and nor is it merely incidental to his thought. On the contrary, Rancière understands sociology to constitute a problematic, a set of assumptions and interpretative procedures whose blind spots must be identified and thought through in order that the possibility of intellectual and political emancipation, of democracy, and of history can be thought at all. Rancière's thought thus represents a counter-sociology and his rejection of the sociological problematic serves as the positive condition of possibility of his theory of democracy, equality, and emancipation. This new study both clarifies the nature of Rancière's critique of the sociological problematic and shows what his counter-sociology allows him to think in the domains of politics, history, and education. Jeremy F. Lane is Professor of French & Critical Theory in the Department of Modern Languages & Cultures at the University of Nottingham, UK.
600 1 0 $a Rancière, Jacques. $3 1452976
650 2 4 $a Critical Theory. $3 1111035
650 2 4 $a Political Philosophy. $3 671691
650 1 4 $a Continental Philosophy. $3 1172523
650 0 $a Philosophy, French $y 21st century. $3 1457143
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59880-7
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)