國立虎尾科技大學 |

The encyclopedia of philosophy of religion

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The encyclopedia of philosophy of religion/ edited by Stewart Goetz and Charles Taliaferro.
其他作者:	Taliaferro, Charles.
出版者:	Hoboken, NJ :Wiley-Blackwell, : 2021.,
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (4 v.)
附註:	"Volume I, II, III & IV."
標題:	Religion - Dictionaries. - Philosophy -
電子資源:	https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781119009924
ISBN:	9781119009924

The encyclopedia of philosophy of religion
The encyclopedia of philosophy of religion[electronic resource] /edited by Stewart Goetz and Charles Taliaferro. - 1st ed. - Hoboken, NJ :Wiley-Blackwell,2021. - 1 online resource (4 v.)

"Volume I, II, III & IV."

Includes bibliographical references and index.

"Why an encyclopedia of the philosophy of religion? Because human beings have been and continue to be religious. Indeed, if one thinks in terms of what it is to be human, what is the essence of a human being, one can reasonably hold that it includes the property of trying to make sense of things and events, and religion, in terms of both belief and practice, is a way of doing this. A religious response to this attempt at sense-making in no way implies that those who are not religious are not trying to make sense of things. They are, but conclude that the sought-after intelligibility, if it can be had, can be had without religion. So if one thinks of philosophy as, at least in part, a rational pursuit of intelligibility about things and events, then the philosophy of religion can plausibly be construed as the pursuit of this intelligibility in religious terms, and an encyclopedia of philosophy of religion as an orderly assemblage of entries about this rational undertaking. While the philosophy of religion has often been thought of as a "Western" activity which is engaged in by those in the Abrahamic faiths (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam), from the inception of this project we have believed it is important to think globally in terms of the scope of entries included in the encyclopedia. Hence, there are not only numerous entries on topics and individuals within the Abrahamic religious traditions, but also equally numerous entries on issues and people in Buddhism, Hinduism, Jainism, and other religious traditions. We have sought to be diverse in terms of the inclusion of entries across the religious world, not because we believe diversity and inclusion are goods in their own right, but because they are instrumental to helping us think more clearly about the overall intellectual project of making sense of things in terms of religion. Some persons might object that because the idea of making sense of things is a rational notion and religion, when properly understood, is at its core a rejection of the notion that things and events are intelligible, the philosophy of religion is itself a deeply incoherent intellectual discipline. Indeed, if we assume a desire tomake sense of things, the attempt to fulfill this desire along with perhaps its eventual frustration is a source of suffering. And who wants to suffer? Thus religion at its core is about giving up on the attempt to make sense of things and to achieve a state of "mind" in which there is nothingness or oneness with all things and, as a result, nothing distinct from other things of which to make sense. While this point is well made and appreciated, it nevertheless is also a fact that anyone reading one or more of the entries in this encyclopedia of the philosophy of religion is a person who is seeking to learn about, and thus make sense of, something or someone related to a particular religion or religions. So at least to this degree the reader is an individual who is pursuing intelligibility about that which is religious, or related to what is religious, in nature. And an initial assumption that the attempt to satisfy the desire for intelligibility through religion must fail and produce suffering is at least questionable. Finally, because this is an encyclopedia of the philosophy of religion, there are many entries about views and peoplewho believe that there are good reasons to reject .religion altogether. These entries are warranted because the issues and people they cover occupy an important place in the dialogue that takes place between individuals with differing views who live in a shared global space"--

ISBN: 9781119009924Subjects--Topical Terms:

866712
Religion
--Philosophy--Dictionaries.

LC Class. No.: BL51 / .E535 2021eb

Dewey Class. No.: 210.3

The encyclopedia of philosophy of religion
LDR:04581cam a2200277 a 4500 001 1137926
005 20241202072503.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 250110s2021 nju obe 001 0 eng d
020 $a 9781119009924 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 1119009928 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $z 9781119010951
035 $a 16201692
040 $a YDX $b eng $c YDX $d OXF $d YDXIT $d OCLCO $d OCLCQ $d OCLCO
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a BL51 $b .E535 2021eb
082 0 4 $a 210.3 $2 23
245 0 4 $a The encyclopedia of philosophy of religion $h [electronic resource] / $c edited by Stewart Goetz and Charles Taliaferro.
250 $a 1st ed.
260 $a Hoboken, NJ : $b Wiley-Blackwell, $c 2021.
300 $a 1 online resource (4 v.)
500 $a "Volume I, II, III & IV."
504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index.
520 $a "Why an encyclopedia of the philosophy of religion? Because human beings have been and continue to be religious. Indeed, if one thinks in terms of what it is to be human, what is the essence of a human being, one can reasonably hold that it includes the property of trying to make sense of things and events, and religion, in terms of both belief and practice, is a way of doing this. A religious response to this attempt at sense-making in no way implies that those who are not religious are not trying to make sense of things. They are, but conclude that the sought-after intelligibility, if it can be had, can be had without religion. So if one thinks of philosophy as, at least in part, a rational pursuit of intelligibility about things and events, then the philosophy of religion can plausibly be construed as the pursuit of this intelligibility in religious terms, and an encyclopedia of philosophy of religion as an orderly assemblage of entries about this rational undertaking. While the philosophy of religion has often been thought of as a "Western" activity which is engaged in by those in the Abrahamic faiths (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam), from the inception of this project we have believed it is important to think globally in terms of the scope of entries included in the encyclopedia. Hence, there are not only numerous entries on topics and individuals within the Abrahamic religious traditions, but also equally numerous entries on issues and people in Buddhism, Hinduism, Jainism, and other religious traditions. We have sought to be diverse in terms of the inclusion of entries across the religious world, not because we believe diversity and inclusion are goods in their own right, but because they are instrumental to helping us think more clearly about the overall intellectual project of making sense of things in terms of religion. Some persons might object that because the idea of making sense of things is a rational notion and religion, when properly understood, is at its core a rejection of the notion that things and events are intelligible, the philosophy of religion is itself a deeply incoherent intellectual discipline. Indeed, if we assume a desire tomake sense of things, the attempt to fulfill this desire along with perhaps its eventual frustration is a source of suffering. And who wants to suffer? Thus religion at its core is about giving up on the attempt to make sense of things and to achieve a state of "mind" in which there is nothingness or oneness with all things and, as a result, nothing distinct from other things of which to make sense. While this point is well made and appreciated, it nevertheless is also a fact that anyone reading one or more of the entries in this encyclopedia of the philosophy of religion is a person who is seeking to learn about, and thus make sense of, something or someone related to a particular religion or religions. So at least to this degree the reader is an individual who is pursuing intelligibility about that which is religious, or related to what is religious, in nature. And an initial assumption that the attempt to satisfy the desire for intelligibility through religion must fail and produce suffering is at least questionable. Finally, because this is an encyclopedia of the philosophy of religion, there are many entries about views and peoplewho believe that there are good reasons to reject .religion altogether. These entries are warranted because the issues and people they cover occupy an important place in the dialogue that takes place between individuals with differing views who live in a shared global space"-- $c Provided by publisher.
588 $a Print version record.
650 0 $a Religion $x Philosophy $v Dictionaries. $3 866712
700 1 $a Taliaferro, Charles. $3 801946
700 1 $a Goetz, Stewart. $3 1412735
856 4 0 $u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781119009924