國立虎尾科技大學 |

Supernatural Law? A Refutation of Three Recent Natural-Law Arguments Against Catholic Integralism.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Supernatural Law? A Refutation of Three Recent Natural-Law Arguments Against Catholic Integralism./
作者:	Dellinger, Jackson.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (37 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International85-01.
標題:	Philosophy of religion. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798379851088

Supernatural Law? A Refutation of Three Recent Natural-Law Arguments Against Catholic Integralism.
Dellinger, Jackson.

Supernatural Law? A Refutation of Three Recent Natural-Law Arguments Against Catholic Integralism. - 1 online resource (37 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01.

Thesis (M.A.)--The University of Mississippi, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

In the United States, there is a longstanding debate over the proper relationship between religious and civil institutions, or "church and state." One radical voice in the debate is that of Catholic integralism, a school within Catholic social teaching which argues that Catholic governments should submit to the religious authority of the Church, and that Catholics should aspire towards a Catholic society with this relationship between Church and State for all nations. Recently, interlocutors have attempted to show that integralism is inconsistent with a core element of the Catholic teaching to which they appeal-that is, natural law. In this paper, I respond to three such arguments.The first argues that integralists violate natural laws pertaining to individual justice through a consequentialist political philosophy. I argue that integralists do no such thing. Rather, they recognize limits on state policing of individuals, even in pursuit of the common good. The second argues that integralism, negating all constitutional limits, constitutes a form of totalitarianism. I argue that it does not. Rather, integralists may support a variety of constitutional schemes within reason and that integralism is built on a specific constitutional limitation, the distinction between the Church and the State powers. The third argues that integralism (in both "thick" and "thin" varieties) treats religious groups unfairly. I argue that thin integralism does not. Rather, thin integralists treat religious groups according to their baptismal status, an element of Catholic teaching.I conclude the paper by acknowledging the connection between integralism and Catholic teaching and the difficulty in upholding Catholicism while making quick work of integralism.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798379851088Subjects--Topical Terms:

1009204
Philosophy of religion.
Subjects--Index Terms:

CatholicIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Supernatural Law? A Refutation of Three Recent Natural-Law Arguments Against Catholic Integralism.
LDR:03148ntm a2200409K 4500 001 1141129
005 20231130111621.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798379851088
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30488868
035 $a AAI30488868
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Dellinger, Jackson. $3 1464743
245 1 0 $a Supernatural Law? A Refutation of Three Recent Natural-Law Arguments Against Catholic Integralism.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (37 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01.
500 $a Advisor: Skultety, Steven.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--The University of Mississippi, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a In the United States, there is a longstanding debate over the proper relationship between religious and civil institutions, or "church and state." One radical voice in the debate is that of Catholic integralism, a school within Catholic social teaching which argues that Catholic governments should submit to the religious authority of the Church, and that Catholics should aspire towards a Catholic society with this relationship between Church and State for all nations. Recently, interlocutors have attempted to show that integralism is inconsistent with a core element of the Catholic teaching to which they appeal-that is, natural law. In this paper, I respond to three such arguments.The first argues that integralists violate natural laws pertaining to individual justice through a consequentialist political philosophy. I argue that integralists do no such thing. Rather, they recognize limits on state policing of individuals, even in pursuit of the common good. The second argues that integralism, negating all constitutional limits, constitutes a form of totalitarianism. I argue that it does not. Rather, integralists may support a variety of constitutional schemes within reason and that integralism is built on a specific constitutional limitation, the distinction between the Church and the State powers. The third argues that integralism (in both "thick" and "thin" varieties) treats religious groups unfairly. I argue that thin integralism does not. Rather, thin integralists treat religious groups according to their baptismal status, an element of Catholic teaching.I conclude the paper by acknowledging the connection between integralism and Catholic teaching and the difficulty in upholding Catholicism while making quick work of integralism.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Philosophy of religion. $2 bicssc $3 1009204
650 4 $a Law. $3 671705
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 559771
653 $a Catholic
653 $a Church and State
653 $a Integralism
653 $a Liberalism
653 $a Natural law
653 $a Postliberalism
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0322
690 $a 0398
710 2 $a The University of Mississippi. $b Philosophy. $3 1464744
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 85-01.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30488868 $z click for full text (PQDT)