國立虎尾科技大學 |

Exploring Multiple Understandings of Western Wildfires in Support of Knowledge Co-Production Practices.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Exploring Multiple Understandings of Western Wildfires in Support of Knowledge Co-Production Practices./
作者:	Russo, Michal.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (274 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-03B.
標題:	Environmental science. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798380371445

Exploring Multiple Understandings of Western Wildfires in Support of Knowledge Co-Production Practices.
Russo, Michal.

Exploring Multiple Understandings of Western Wildfires in Support of Knowledge Co-Production Practices. - 1 online resource (274 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

Addressing society's most pressing and complex sustainability challenges requires a more productive collaboration between research and practice. Environmental governance increasingly turns to knowledge co-production, a collaborative and participatory process in which teams of researchers, policymakers, practitioners, and other relevant actors jointly produce knowledge to inform decision-making. Transdisciplinary research teams reflect multiple understandings, drawing from their members' diverse perspectives, experiences, cultures, and ways of knowing. A scholarly principle of knowledge co-production is recognizing and legitimizing those multiple understandings. However, how practice can (and should) attend to those multiple understandings (i.e., recognize, include, respect, and sustain) remains unclear. This dissertation aims to improve how knowledge co-production practices attend to multiple understandings within the context of western wildfire challenges. I report on a mixed methods investigation that responds to the following three research questions: (1) How can knowledge co-production practices identify and characterize multiple understandings of western wildfire challenges?(2) How can knowledge co-production practices quantify the distribution of and explore the relationship between multiple understandings of western wildfire challenges?(3) What model of team learning could help transdisciplinary teams continue to take advantage of their multiple understandings?Western wildfires represent a complex and rapidly changing sustainability challenge. Co-production among diverse actors has been identified as necessary to inform collective actions to manage wildfire risks more effectively. However, practitioners need better approaches to attend to multiple understandings. In Chapter 2, I present an empirical narrative analysis based on semi-structured interviews with sixty influential actors. I construct nine social narratives that capture actors' shared stories about the causes, consequences, and solutions to western wildfire challenges. I find narrative analysis to be a pragmatic approach to characterize the strategies and scales that distinguish between actors' understandings while retaining the language and power embedded in those understandings. In Chapter 3, I present the findings of an online survey that explores the understandings of a purposive sample of one hundred and fifty-three (153) highly influential wildfire actors. My analysis suggests that actors' understandings are nuanced, overlapping, and do not align with actor types. Research findings emphasize the importance of elicitation techniques that capture the complexity of actors' understandings and prompt dialog and reflexivity. In Chapter 4, I present a perspective on how transdisciplinary teams working on complex sustainability challenges can sustain integrative and iterative team learning to continue to take advantage of their multiple understandings. I synthesize literature in team science to characterize the relationship between team learning and team cognitive structure, i.e., the pattern by which knowledge is organized, represented, and distributed within a team. I offer a conceptual model of a resilient team cognition necessary to sustain knowledge co-production practices. I provide insight on the features that characterize and factors that facilitate resilient team cognitions. In this dissertation, I present approaches to advance how practice attends to multiple understandings. The qualitative and quantitative empirical findings emphasize the importance of capturing the language, power, and rich complexity embedded in actors' understandings of sustainability challenges. The literature synthesis advances understanding by situating knowledge co-productions' aspirational ideas about team learning within emergent literature about the role of team cognition.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798380371445Subjects--Topical Terms:

1179128
Environmental science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Knowledge co-productionIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Exploring Multiple Understandings of Western Wildfires in Support of Knowledge Co-Production Practices.
LDR:05435ntm a22004337 4500 001 1141967
005 20240604073613.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798380371445
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30747535
035 $a (MiAaPQ)umichrackham005137
035 $a AAI30747535
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Russo, Michal. $3 1466080
245 1 0 $a Exploring Multiple Understandings of Western Wildfires in Support of Knowledge Co-Production Practices.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (274 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Fischer, Alexandra Paige.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Addressing society's most pressing and complex sustainability challenges requires a more productive collaboration between research and practice. Environmental governance increasingly turns to knowledge co-production, a collaborative and participatory process in which teams of researchers, policymakers, practitioners, and other relevant actors jointly produce knowledge to inform decision-making. Transdisciplinary research teams reflect multiple understandings, drawing from their members' diverse perspectives, experiences, cultures, and ways of knowing. A scholarly principle of knowledge co-production is recognizing and legitimizing those multiple understandings. However, how practice can (and should) attend to those multiple understandings (i.e., recognize, include, respect, and sustain) remains unclear. This dissertation aims to improve how knowledge co-production practices attend to multiple understandings within the context of western wildfire challenges. I report on a mixed methods investigation that responds to the following three research questions: (1) How can knowledge co-production practices identify and characterize multiple understandings of western wildfire challenges?(2) How can knowledge co-production practices quantify the distribution of and explore the relationship between multiple understandings of western wildfire challenges?(3) What model of team learning could help transdisciplinary teams continue to take advantage of their multiple understandings?Western wildfires represent a complex and rapidly changing sustainability challenge. Co-production among diverse actors has been identified as necessary to inform collective actions to manage wildfire risks more effectively. However, practitioners need better approaches to attend to multiple understandings. In Chapter 2, I present an empirical narrative analysis based on semi-structured interviews with sixty influential actors. I construct nine social narratives that capture actors' shared stories about the causes, consequences, and solutions to western wildfire challenges. I find narrative analysis to be a pragmatic approach to characterize the strategies and scales that distinguish between actors' understandings while retaining the language and power embedded in those understandings. In Chapter 3, I present the findings of an online survey that explores the understandings of a purposive sample of one hundred and fifty-three (153) highly influential wildfire actors. My analysis suggests that actors' understandings are nuanced, overlapping, and do not align with actor types. Research findings emphasize the importance of elicitation techniques that capture the complexity of actors' understandings and prompt dialog and reflexivity. In Chapter 4, I present a perspective on how transdisciplinary teams working on complex sustainability challenges can sustain integrative and iterative team learning to continue to take advantage of their multiple understandings. I synthesize literature in team science to characterize the relationship between team learning and team cognitive structure, i.e., the pattern by which knowledge is organized, represented, and distributed within a team. I offer a conceptual model of a resilient team cognition necessary to sustain knowledge co-production practices. I provide insight on the features that characterize and factors that facilitate resilient team cognitions. In this dissertation, I present approaches to advance how practice attends to multiple understandings. The qualitative and quantitative empirical findings emphasize the importance of capturing the language, power, and rich complexity embedded in actors' understandings of sustainability challenges. The literature synthesis advances understanding by situating knowledge co-productions' aspirational ideas about team learning within emergent literature about the role of team cognition.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Environmental science. $3 1179128
650 4 $a Sustainability. $3 793436
650 4 $a Ecology. $3 575279
650 4 $a Natural resource management. $3 1178831
653 $a Knowledge co-production
653 $a Sustainability science
653 $a Collaborative governance
653 $a Team science
653 $a Social narratives
653 $a Socio-ecological systems
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0768
690 $a 0640
690 $a 0329
690 $a 0528
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Michigan. $b Resource Policy & Behavior PhD. $3 1466081
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-03B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30747535 $z click for full text (PQDT)