國立虎尾科技大學 |

Political Discourse and Discussions of "Fake News" on Reddit : = Prevalence, Popularity, and Perceived Credibility.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Political Discourse and Discussions of "Fake News" on Reddit :/
其他題名:	Prevalence, Popularity, and Perceived Credibility.
作者:	Tsou, Andrew.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (305 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-07, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-07A.
標題:	Information science. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798381375114

Political Discourse and Discussions of "Fake News" on Reddit : = Prevalence, Popularity, and Perceived Credibility.
Tsou, Andrew.

Political Discourse and Discussions of "Fake News" on Reddit :Prevalence, Popularity, and Perceived Credibility. - 1 online resource (305 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-07, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

In the past, political disagreements were largely a matter of opinion, with individuals disagreeing on matters of policy or personal values. Now, however, different political factions frequently no longer agree on basic facts, let alone on how to interpret or act on them. This dissertation considers the ways in which "fake news" and its variants (misinformation, disinformation, propaganda, etc.) are discussed by users of the news aggregator and social media site Reddit. A series of controversial news topics were identified, and Reddit comments (n=571,215) pertaining to these topics were gathered using an automated script. The primary methods that were used for this study are content analysis and CMDA, both of which informed the development of two coding schemes that were applied to the gathered comments. One coding scheme focused on discourse features, while the second scheme allowed for a granular analysis of comments that actively discussed fake news, misinformation, propaganda, and other distortions of the truth. User upvotes were used as a proxy for presumed credibility, and discourse styles and content were compared between broadly defined political subfactions (liberal, conservative, and neutral). The results of this research found that discussions about fake news, misinformation, etc. are prevalent on political Reddit threads, constituting 13% of comments, with marked differences in commenting behavior across liberal, conservative, and neutral Reddit communities. Most significantly, the conservative communities were less likely to discuss lies, misinformation, etc. when compared to the neutral and liberal subreddits. The results also provide insights into echo chambers on Reddit; not only are commenters in partisan communities less prone to include second-person attacks than commenters in neutral spaces are, the partisan communities use "us vs. them" words such as "our," "we," and "their/them/they" more often than would be expected. This suggests that participants in these communities are less likely to challenge each others' assumptions and worldviews, thus contributing to political divisions and extremism. Overall, the results of this research contribute to understanding online political discourse, contemporary notions of credibility, and the ways in which online commenters react to the "fake news" phenomenon itself.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798381375114Subjects--Topical Terms:

561178
Information science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Computer-mediated communicationIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Political Discourse and Discussions of "Fake News" on Reddit : = Prevalence, Popularity, and Perceived Credibility.
LDR:03807ntm a22004097 4500 001 1143054
005 20240513061053.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798381375114
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30818280
035 $a AAI30818280
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Tsou, Andrew. $3 1467624
245 1 0 $a Political Discourse and Discussions of "Fake News" on Reddit : $b Prevalence, Popularity, and Perceived Credibility.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (305 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-07, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Herring, Susan C.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a In the past, political disagreements were largely a matter of opinion, with individuals disagreeing on matters of policy or personal values. Now, however, different political factions frequently no longer agree on basic facts, let alone on how to interpret or act on them. This dissertation considers the ways in which "fake news" and its variants (misinformation, disinformation, propaganda, etc.) are discussed by users of the news aggregator and social media site Reddit. A series of controversial news topics were identified, and Reddit comments (n=571,215) pertaining to these topics were gathered using an automated script. The primary methods that were used for this study are content analysis and CMDA, both of which informed the development of two coding schemes that were applied to the gathered comments. One coding scheme focused on discourse features, while the second scheme allowed for a granular analysis of comments that actively discussed fake news, misinformation, propaganda, and other distortions of the truth. User upvotes were used as a proxy for presumed credibility, and discourse styles and content were compared between broadly defined political subfactions (liberal, conservative, and neutral). The results of this research found that discussions about fake news, misinformation, etc. are prevalent on political Reddit threads, constituting 13% of comments, with marked differences in commenting behavior across liberal, conservative, and neutral Reddit communities. Most significantly, the conservative communities were less likely to discuss lies, misinformation, etc. when compared to the neutral and liberal subreddits. The results also provide insights into echo chambers on Reddit; not only are commenters in partisan communities less prone to include second-person attacks than commenters in neutral spaces are, the partisan communities use "us vs. them" words such as "our," "we," and "their/them/they" more often than would be expected. This suggests that participants in these communities are less likely to challenge each others' assumptions and worldviews, thus contributing to political divisions and extremism. Overall, the results of this research contribute to understanding online political discourse, contemporary notions of credibility, and the ways in which online commenters react to the "fake news" phenomenon itself.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Information science. $3 561178
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 557829
650 4 $a Language. $3 571568
650 4 $a Political science. $3 558774
653 $a Computer-mediated communication
653 $a Fake news
653 $a Reddit threads
653 $a Political disagreements
653 $a Extremism
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0723
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0679
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Indiana University. $b Information Science. $3 1183334
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-07A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30818280 $z click for full text (PQDT)