國立虎尾科技大學 |

Forging New Just War Principles for the Virtuous War Era.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Forging New Just War Principles for the Virtuous War Era./
作者:	Toral, Todd C.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (111 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-07.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International84-07.
標題:	Military studies. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798368430881

Forging New Just War Principles for the Virtuous War Era.
Toral, Todd C.

Forging New Just War Principles for the Virtuous War Era. - 1 online resource (111 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-07.

Thesis (A.L.M.)--Harvard University, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

The Just War ethic, with its two pillars jus ad bellum and jus in bello, is central to the evaluation of the morality of entering into and the conduct of war. Whether grounded in custom and tradition, or based on developments in divine, natural, international, or positive law, the Just War ethic exists as a model capable of defining the bounds of the morality of going to and waging war in a just manner in specific social and political contexts. The ethic developed in response to technological, social, and paradigm shifts tied generally to five historical periods: (1) antiquity; (2) the late Hellenistic/early medieval period; (3) medieval period; (4) the early modern period; and (5) the late-modern contemporary period. The world is experiencing another paradigm shift: virtuous war. Professor James Der Derian coined the phrase to describe conflicts where technological mastery by digitally advanced states has removed their death from their calculation of whether there is just cause to intervene and just means for how to do so, and those technological capabilities are deployed with an ethical imperative for global humanitarian engagement. Strictly construed, the contemporary formulation of the Just War ethic is insufficient to address the moral, political, and legal dimensions of virtuous war. But the ethic is supple; its history replete with reformulations. It is also versatile enough to permit improvement through assimilation of a new, more contemporary set of principles mined from the historical record and forged into a new model capable of meeting the virtuous war moment. Doing so will (1) improve international relations discourse, (2) make international conflict debate more precise during an era where technological capability lowers barriers to intervention while humanitarian crises command it, and (3) improve collective security by striking the appropriate balance between humanitarian exigencies and traditional Westphalian sovereignty norms. This thesis identifies new moral principles and forges them into a new Just War ethic capable of being adopted by actors (individuals and states) to meet the virtuous war moment. The thesis first analyzes the evolution of the moral rules from antiquity to the modern period, focusing on the development of the Just War ethic. Starting from the beginning provides contour for a broader discussion of virtuous war, how it differs from prior periods and thus requires new rules, and how the Just War ethic makes room for those new rules. Principles imported from the jus ad pacem, jus in pace, and jus post bellum academic discourses are discussed to address conceptual confusion and bring coherence to virtuous war's new moral territory. The thesis continues with a discussion of recent engagements that create a genetic through-line describing how the West moved toward and adopted virtuous war. This discussion is organized around "failed," "rogue," and "inept" states, starting with Somalia, Kosovo, Iraq, and Libya, and concluding with the recent jus cogens intervention in Syria. The thesis concludes with a discussion of how international norms and legal frameworks should respond to meet the moral challenges imposed by virtuous war, and then closes with a proposed international scheme in the form of a proposed Model United Nations Resolution that adopts the newly forged Just War principles grounded in jus ad pacem, jus in pace, and jus post bellum.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798368430881Subjects--Topical Terms:

1148605
Military studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Just warsIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Forging New Just War Principles for the Virtuous War Era.
LDR:04706ntm a22003737 4500 001 1143067
005 20240513060750.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798368430881
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30244854
035 $a AAI30244854
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Toral, Todd C. $3 1467639
245 1 0 $a Forging New Just War Principles for the Virtuous War Era.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (111 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-07.
500 $a Advisor: Miner, Michael M.;Nichols, Thomas T.
502 $a Thesis (A.L.M.)--Harvard University, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The Just War ethic, with its two pillars jus ad bellum and jus in bello, is central to the evaluation of the morality of entering into and the conduct of war. Whether grounded in custom and tradition, or based on developments in divine, natural, international, or positive law, the Just War ethic exists as a model capable of defining the bounds of the morality of going to and waging war in a just manner in specific social and political contexts. The ethic developed in response to technological, social, and paradigm shifts tied generally to five historical periods: (1) antiquity; (2) the late Hellenistic/early medieval period; (3) medieval period; (4) the early modern period; and (5) the late-modern contemporary period. The world is experiencing another paradigm shift: virtuous war. Professor James Der Derian coined the phrase to describe conflicts where technological mastery by digitally advanced states has removed their death from their calculation of whether there is just cause to intervene and just means for how to do so, and those technological capabilities are deployed with an ethical imperative for global humanitarian engagement. Strictly construed, the contemporary formulation of the Just War ethic is insufficient to address the moral, political, and legal dimensions of virtuous war. But the ethic is supple; its history replete with reformulations. It is also versatile enough to permit improvement through assimilation of a new, more contemporary set of principles mined from the historical record and forged into a new model capable of meeting the virtuous war moment. Doing so will (1) improve international relations discourse, (2) make international conflict debate more precise during an era where technological capability lowers barriers to intervention while humanitarian crises command it, and (3) improve collective security by striking the appropriate balance between humanitarian exigencies and traditional Westphalian sovereignty norms. This thesis identifies new moral principles and forges them into a new Just War ethic capable of being adopted by actors (individuals and states) to meet the virtuous war moment. The thesis first analyzes the evolution of the moral rules from antiquity to the modern period, focusing on the development of the Just War ethic. Starting from the beginning provides contour for a broader discussion of virtuous war, how it differs from prior periods and thus requires new rules, and how the Just War ethic makes room for those new rules. Principles imported from the jus ad pacem, jus in pace, and jus post bellum academic discourses are discussed to address conceptual confusion and bring coherence to virtuous war's new moral territory. The thesis continues with a discussion of recent engagements that create a genetic through-line describing how the West moved toward and adopted virtuous war. This discussion is organized around "failed," "rogue," and "inept" states, starting with Somalia, Kosovo, Iraq, and Libya, and concluding with the recent jus cogens intervention in Syria. The thesis concludes with a discussion of how international norms and legal frameworks should respond to meet the moral challenges imposed by virtuous war, and then closes with a proposed international scheme in the form of a proposed Model United Nations Resolution that adopts the newly forged Just War principles grounded in jus ad pacem, jus in pace, and jus post bellum.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Military studies. $3 1148605
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 555769
653 $a Just wars
653 $a War principles
653 $a Sovereignty
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0750
690 $a 0394
710 2 $a Harvard University. $b Extension Studies. $3 1372761
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 84-07.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30244854 $z click for full text (PQDT)