國立虎尾科技大學 |

Essays on Banking and Fintech Competition.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Essays on Banking and Fintech Competition./
作者:	Reggi Pecora, Alexandre.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (98 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-01A.
標題:	Finance. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798379944407

Essays on Banking and Fintech Competition.
Reggi Pecora, Alexandre.

Essays on Banking and Fintech Competition. - 1 online resource (98 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

My dissertation analyzes the competition between traditional banks and alternative lenders, namely Fintechs or Peer-to-Peer (P2P) platforms, in the context of credit to small businesses. P2P platforms are online marketplaces that directly match lenders with borrowers without the intermediation of a bank. This study is conducted in partnership with the Brazilian Central Bank and Jose Renato Haas Ornellas, which provided the data of virtually all unsecured working capital loans to small businesses in Brazil. The dissertation is divided into two chapters, an empirical and a theoretical.In chapter 1, we understand the profile and credit conditions of P2P borrowers, and estimate that banks react to the competition with the P2P lenders. Compared to traditional banks, P2P clients are relatively smaller, riskier and get lower interest rates. Once they borrow from P2Ps, they find a lower rate on subsequent bank loans, indicating that banks try to recapture runaway borrowers. In response to P2P entry, incumbent banks in oligopolistic markets decrease their lending rates by 2.5 percentage points and expand credit supply by 7%.In chapter 2, we rationalize these findings in a structural model of the banking sector, where banks and P2Ps have different profit functions and compete for clients with risk heterogeneity. We use the estimated model to calculate welfare gains. P2Ps significantly increase social welfare in oligopolistic markets by offering lower interest rates to riskier borrowers and forcing the banks to do the same. Welfare gains range from 10% of the local output in municipalities with only one incumbent bank to 1% in those with five banks. Our findings highlight the importance of alternative financing sources in inefficient credit markets due to banking concentration.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798379944407Subjects--Topical Terms:

559073
Finance.
Subjects--Index Terms:

BanksIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Essays on Banking and Fintech Competition.
LDR:03124ntm a22003977 4500 001 1143125
005 20240513060803.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798379944407
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30493647
035 $a AAI30493647
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Reggi Pecora, Alexandre. $3 1467718
245 1 0 $a Essays on Banking and Fintech Competition.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (98 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Frank, Murray;Wang, Tracy Yue.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a My dissertation analyzes the competition between traditional banks and alternative lenders, namely Fintechs or Peer-to-Peer (P2P) platforms, in the context of credit to small businesses. P2P platforms are online marketplaces that directly match lenders with borrowers without the intermediation of a bank. This study is conducted in partnership with the Brazilian Central Bank and Jose Renato Haas Ornellas, which provided the data of virtually all unsecured working capital loans to small businesses in Brazil. The dissertation is divided into two chapters, an empirical and a theoretical.In chapter 1, we understand the profile and credit conditions of P2P borrowers, and estimate that banks react to the competition with the P2P lenders. Compared to traditional banks, P2P clients are relatively smaller, riskier and get lower interest rates. Once they borrow from P2Ps, they find a lower rate on subsequent bank loans, indicating that banks try to recapture runaway borrowers. In response to P2P entry, incumbent banks in oligopolistic markets decrease their lending rates by 2.5 percentage points and expand credit supply by 7%.In chapter 2, we rationalize these findings in a structural model of the banking sector, where banks and P2Ps have different profit functions and compete for clients with risk heterogeneity. We use the estimated model to calculate welfare gains. P2Ps significantly increase social welfare in oligopolistic markets by offering lower interest rates to riskier borrowers and forcing the banks to do the same. Welfare gains range from 10% of the local output in municipalities with only one incumbent bank to 1% in those with five banks. Our findings highlight the importance of alternative financing sources in inefficient credit markets due to banking concentration.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Finance. $3 559073
653 $a Banks
653 $a Fintechs
653 $a Market power
653 $a Social welfare
653 $a P2P borrowers
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0508
690 $a 0505
690 $a 0770
710 2 $a University of Minnesota. $b Business Administration. $3 1179082
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-01A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30493647 $z click for full text (PQDT)