國立虎尾科技大學 |

The Diffusion of Moral Innovations : = Cultural Learning Processes Spread Novel Forms of Cooperation.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Diffusion of Moral Innovations :/
其他題名:	Cultural Learning Processes Spread Novel Forms of Cooperation.
作者:	Kraft-Todd, Gordon Thomas.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (178 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-03B.
標題:	Social psychology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781088319147

The Diffusion of Moral Innovations : = Cultural Learning Processes Spread Novel Forms of Cooperation.
Kraft-Todd, Gordon Thomas.

The Diffusion of Moral Innovations :Cultural Learning Processes Spread Novel Forms of Cooperation. - 1 online resource (178 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Yale University, 2019.

Includes bibliographical references

I begin with humans' unique position as the product of two evolutionary processes ("dual-inheritance theory"; D. Campbell, 1965; Cavalli-Sforza, Feldman, Chen, & Dornbusch, 1982; Henrich & McElreath, 2007; Richerson & Boyd, 1978). Our species, like all known others, are products of biological evolution, subject to the pressure of natural selection which favors self-interested behaviors enabling individuals to survive and reproduce (Darwin, 1859). In this context, it seems that cooperation-in the game theoretic sense, an individual paying a cost to give another a benefit (Von Neumann, 1959)-would not be favored by natural selection. Unlike other species, however, humans are also products of cultural evolution (Boyd & Richerson, 1976), subject to the pressure of cultural, within-group selection which favors behaviors that conform to group norms (Akerlof, 1976; Boyd & Richerson, 1985; Ellison & Fudenberg, 1993). In this context, it seems that innovation-in the sociological sense, an idea or practice first adopted by a small subset of the population (technically, chronologically prior to "early-adopters"; E. Rogers, 1962/2003)-would not be favored by cultural selection. At the intersection of biological and cultural evolutionary processes is the uniquely human phenomenon of morality, which can be understood as the subset of cultural norms (e.g. Schaller & Crandall, 2004) governing the tension between self-interest and cooperation (Curry, 2016; Greene, 2015; Hoffman, Yoeli, & Navarrete, 2016; Tomasello & Vaish, 2013). I will refer to the spread of participation in novel collective actions as synonymous with moral innovation, denoting the cooperative and normative nature of this behavior as well as its early adoption. Given both types of evolutionary pressures on us to pursue self-interested, conformist behaviors, it might seem that an individual engaged in moral innovation is employing a doubly losing strategy. Yet, to take just one example of an effort to promote participation in novel collective actions, increasing interest in encouraging the adoption of new pro-environmental technologies and behaviors-as revealed across literatures in the social sciences, such as psychology (Steg & Vlek, 2009), economics (Rennings, 2000), public policy (Nill & Kemp, 2009), and business (Nidumolu, Prahalad, & Rangaswami, 2009)-appears to provide evidence against this conclusion. Why, then, do we forgo self-interest and buck cultural norms, to participate in novel collective actions?

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781088319147Subjects--Topical Terms:

554804
Social psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

CooperationIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

The Diffusion of Moral Innovations : = Cultural Learning Processes Spread Novel Forms of Cooperation.
LDR:03885ntm a22003857 4500 001 1143939
005 20240531084149.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2019 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781088319147
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13810078
035 $a AAI13810078
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Kraft-Todd, Gordon Thomas. $3 1468756
245 1 4 $a The Diffusion of Moral Innovations : $b Cultural Learning Processes Spread Novel Forms of Cooperation.
264 0 $c 2019
300 $a 1 online resource (178 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Clark, Margaret.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Yale University, 2019.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a I begin with humans' unique position as the product of two evolutionary processes ("dual-inheritance theory"; D. Campbell, 1965; Cavalli-Sforza, Feldman, Chen, & Dornbusch, 1982; Henrich & McElreath, 2007; Richerson & Boyd, 1978). Our species, like all known others, are products of biological evolution, subject to the pressure of natural selection which favors self-interested behaviors enabling individuals to survive and reproduce (Darwin, 1859). In this context, it seems that cooperation-in the game theoretic sense, an individual paying a cost to give another a benefit (Von Neumann, 1959)-would not be favored by natural selection. Unlike other species, however, humans are also products of cultural evolution (Boyd & Richerson, 1976), subject to the pressure of cultural, within-group selection which favors behaviors that conform to group norms (Akerlof, 1976; Boyd & Richerson, 1985; Ellison & Fudenberg, 1993). In this context, it seems that innovation-in the sociological sense, an idea or practice first adopted by a small subset of the population (technically, chronologically prior to "early-adopters"; E. Rogers, 1962/2003)-would not be favored by cultural selection. At the intersection of biological and cultural evolutionary processes is the uniquely human phenomenon of morality, which can be understood as the subset of cultural norms (e.g. Schaller & Crandall, 2004) governing the tension between self-interest and cooperation (Curry, 2016; Greene, 2015; Hoffman, Yoeli, & Navarrete, 2016; Tomasello & Vaish, 2013). I will refer to the spread of participation in novel collective actions as synonymous with moral innovation, denoting the cooperative and normative nature of this behavior as well as its early adoption. Given both types of evolutionary pressures on us to pursue self-interested, conformist behaviors, it might seem that an individual engaged in moral innovation is employing a doubly losing strategy. Yet, to take just one example of an effort to promote participation in novel collective actions, increasing interest in encouraging the adoption of new pro-environmental technologies and behaviors-as revealed across literatures in the social sciences, such as psychology (Steg & Vlek, 2009), economics (Rennings, 2000), public policy (Nill & Kemp, 2009), and business (Nidumolu, Prahalad, & Rangaswami, 2009)-appears to provide evidence against this conclusion. Why, then, do we forgo self-interest and buck cultural norms, to participate in novel collective actions?
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 554804
653 $a Cooperation
653 $a Credibility-enhancing displays
653 $a Influence
653 $a Morality
653 $a Prosocial behavior
653 $a Social learning
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0451
710 2 $a Yale University. $b Psychology. $3 1468757
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-03B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13810078 $z click for full text (PQDT)