國立虎尾科技大學 |

Politics of democratization in South Korea : = Social movements and their political opportunity structures.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Politics of democratization in South Korea :/
其他題名:	Social movements and their political opportunity structures.
作者:	Yun, Seongyi.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (261 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 59-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International59-02A.
標題:	Social structure. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780591413465

Politics of democratization in South Korea : = Social movements and their political opportunity structures.
Yun, Seongyi.

Politics of democratization in South Korea :Social movements and their political opportunity structures. - 1 online resource (261 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 59-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Ohio State University, 1997.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation analyzes the efforts and roles of social movements in South Korean democratization from 1980 to 1987. The basic assumption of this study is that civil society's preparedness was more critical than any other factors in the success or failure of democratization in South Korea. This study refutes a basic assumption of elite-focused theories of democratization, which argue that no transition to democracy is possible without significant divisions within the authoritarian regime itself. The democratic transition in South Korea in 1987 did not follow the process of the splits within the ruling bloc. Rather, it occurred without elite fragmentation. It was pressure from the below, led by active social movement organizations, that forced the cohesive regime to comply with the people's demands for democratization. The preparedness of civil society for democracy is explained by two factors: the resources of social movement organizations, and alliances of diverse social sectors, including student, labor, dissident groups, and the urban poor. The amount of resources and the relative success of alliance were influenced by four aspects of the political opportunity structure: repression of the state, elite fragmentation, external support, and the overall power configuration in the political society. Substantively, this study examines not only state-society relations, but also the horizontal relations of the civil society with itself. Most earlier studies on democratization put their focus on the state or interactions between the state and one of the social sectors. Theoretically, this study accentuates the concept of "political opportunity structure," which was developed by sociologists, in the study of transitions to democracy.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780591413465Subjects--Topical Terms:

555182
Social structure.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Politics of democratization in South Korea : = Social movements and their political opportunity structures.
LDR:03035ntm a22003377 4500 001 1144071
005 20240531084220.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s1997 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780591413465
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI9731753
035 $a AAI9731753
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Yun, Seongyi. $3 1468977
245 1 0 $a Politics of democratization in South Korea : $b Social movements and their political opportunity structures.
264 0 $c 1997
300 $a 1 online resource (261 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 59-02, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Liddle, R. William.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Ohio State University, 1997.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation analyzes the efforts and roles of social movements in South Korean democratization from 1980 to 1987. The basic assumption of this study is that civil society's preparedness was more critical than any other factors in the success or failure of democratization in South Korea. This study refutes a basic assumption of elite-focused theories of democratization, which argue that no transition to democracy is possible without significant divisions within the authoritarian regime itself. The democratic transition in South Korea in 1987 did not follow the process of the splits within the ruling bloc. Rather, it occurred without elite fragmentation. It was pressure from the below, led by active social movement organizations, that forced the cohesive regime to comply with the people's demands for democratization. The preparedness of civil society for democracy is explained by two factors: the resources of social movement organizations, and alliances of diverse social sectors, including student, labor, dissident groups, and the urban poor. The amount of resources and the relative success of alliance were influenced by four aspects of the political opportunity structure: repression of the state, elite fragmentation, external support, and the overall power configuration in the political society. Substantively, this study examines not only state-society relations, but also the horizontal relations of the civil society with itself. Most earlier studies on democratization put their focus on the state or interactions between the state and one of the social sectors. Theoretically, this study accentuates the concept of "political opportunity structure," which was developed by sociologists, in the study of transitions to democracy.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Social structure. $3 555182
650 4 $a Political science. $3 558774
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0700
710 2 $a The Ohio State University. $3 1184483
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 59-02A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9731753 $z click for full text (PQDT)