國立虎尾科技大學 |

A Study on Interpretation of Pressuremeter Test (Compression, Extension Triaxial, Three-Dimensional Analysis, Shansep).

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Study on Interpretation of Pressuremeter Test (Compression, Extension Triaxial, Three-Dimensional Analysis, Shansep)./
作者:	Nasr, Athanacios Nabeh.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (338 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 47-07, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International47-07B.
標題:	Geotechnology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798206083231

A Study on Interpretation of Pressuremeter Test (Compression, Extension Triaxial, Three-Dimensional Analysis, Shansep).
Nasr, Athanacios Nabeh.

A Study on Interpretation of Pressuremeter Test (Compression, Extension Triaxial, Three-Dimensional Analysis, Shansep). - 1 online resource (338 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 47-07, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wayne State University, 1986.

Includes bibliographical references

Since the French civil engineer "Louis Menard" introduced the pressuremeter device, researchers did not stop studying both the apparatus and its theory. There are at least five different methods of interpreting the results of field pressuremeter tests. Each of these methods yields different values of soil parameters when applied to the same pressuremeter test. A laboratory pressuremeter model device was designed and constructed to simulate the pressuremeter test. Artificially sedimented kaolinite samples were used in running the laboratory model tests. These samples were consolidated to different values of the maximum vertical pressure and with overconsolidation ratios ranging from 1 to 8. For comparison purposes, two sets of K(,o)-consolidated undrained triaxial tests: compression and extension were carried out in the same range of the maximum vertical pressure and overconsolidation ratio. The range of variation of the undrained shear strength values computed for the same tested samples by the different methods is very wide and increases with the increase of the overconsolidation ratio. A new method of interpreting the field test results is developed and presented. In this method, the effect of the vertical stress and the excess pore pressure are included when the undrained shear strength is computed. The results of the new method coincide with that of the triaxial test with maximum variation of (+OR-)5%. The procedure of "SHANSEP" method is modified for more practical application. The new procedure is based on identifying the stress history of the tested soil by running the pressuremeter field test. The advantages of the proposed procedure are presented and discussed in the manuscript.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798206083231Subjects--Topical Terms:

1179676
Geotechnology.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

A Study on Interpretation of Pressuremeter Test (Compression, Extension Triaxial, Three-Dimensional Analysis, Shansep).
LDR:02936ntm a22003137 4500 001 1144341
005 20240531083832.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s1986 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798206083231
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI8615411
035 $a AAI8615411
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Nasr, Athanacios Nabeh. $3 1469335
245 1 2 $a A Study on Interpretation of Pressuremeter Test (Compression, Extension Triaxial, Three-Dimensional Analysis, Shansep).
264 0 $c 1986
300 $a 1 online resource (338 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 47-07, Section: B.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wayne State University, 1986.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Since the French civil engineer "Louis Menard" introduced the pressuremeter device, researchers did not stop studying both the apparatus and its theory. There are at least five different methods of interpreting the results of field pressuremeter tests. Each of these methods yields different values of soil parameters when applied to the same pressuremeter test. A laboratory pressuremeter model device was designed and constructed to simulate the pressuremeter test. Artificially sedimented kaolinite samples were used in running the laboratory model tests. These samples were consolidated to different values of the maximum vertical pressure and with overconsolidation ratios ranging from 1 to 8. For comparison purposes, two sets of K(,o)-consolidated undrained triaxial tests: compression and extension were carried out in the same range of the maximum vertical pressure and overconsolidation ratio. The range of variation of the undrained shear strength values computed for the same tested samples by the different methods is very wide and increases with the increase of the overconsolidation ratio. A new method of interpreting the field test results is developed and presented. In this method, the effect of the vertical stress and the excess pore pressure are included when the undrained shear strength is computed. The results of the new method coincide with that of the triaxial test with maximum variation of (+OR-)5%. The procedure of "SHANSEP" method is modified for more practical application. The new procedure is based on identifying the stress history of the tested soil by running the pressuremeter field test. The advantages of the proposed procedure are presented and discussed in the manuscript.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Geotechnology. $3 1179676
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0428
710 2 $a Wayne State University. $3 1182598
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 47-07B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=8615411 $z click for full text (PQDT)