國立虎尾科技大學 |

Mao "Zhuan", Zheng "Jian" xun gu zhong de jing xiao jian gou yu wen ben yi shi = = The Construction of Classics and Text Consciousness in the Exegesis of Mao's Biography and Zheng's Notes.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Mao "Zhuan", Zheng "Jian" xun gu zhong de jing xiao jian gou yu wen ben yi shi =/
其他題名:	The Construction of Classics and Text Consciousness in the Exegesis of Mao's Biography and Zheng's Notes.
其他題名:	Construction of Classics and Text Consciousness in the Exegesis of Mao's Biography and Zheng's Notes.
作者:	Wang, Cheng-Yu.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (444 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-07.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International82-07.
標題:	Asian literature. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798672144498

Mao "Zhuan", Zheng "Jian" xun gu zhong de jing xiao jian gou yu wen ben yi shi = = The Construction of Classics and Text Consciousness in the Exegesis of Mao's Biography and Zheng's Notes.
Wang, Cheng-Yu.

Mao "Zhuan", Zheng "Jian" xun gu zhong de jing xiao jian gou yu wen ben yi shi =The Construction of Classics and Text Consciousness in the Exegesis of Mao's Biography and Zheng's Notes.Construction of Classics and Text Consciousness in the Exegesis of Mao's Biography and Zheng's Notes. - 1 online resource (444 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-07.

Thesis (Master's)--National Taiwan Normal University (Taiwan), 2019.

Includes bibliographical references

本書旨在研究《傳》、《箋》如何藉由解釋《詩經》而建構其經學思想？其建構的經學思想之整體面貌又為何？《傳》、《箋》是否只注重發揮經學思想，而罔顧文本？如果其並非全然罔顧文本，則在其建構經學思想的同時，發現並論述了《詩經》的哪些文本特質？其所認識的文本特質對其訓詁又有何影響？綜括地說，本書就是要藉由現存唯一部完整的漢代《詩經》注解，來展示《詩》如何被漢代訓詁學家建構成「經」，而在其被建構成「經」的同時，又開啟了哪些可能性？針對上述問題，本書嘗試提出《傳》與《箋》的訓詁中，其實存在兩個相輔相成的觀念與方法：「經學建構」、「文本意識」，這兩個概念是後設地建立在以下觀點而提出的：首先，應該重視訓詁中蘊含思想此一命題，並藉此重新觀察學術、思想史。其次，不合文義或錯誤的訓詁並非一無意義，反而可藉此探究訓詁學家不惜違啎文義也要闡發的經學思想。故「經學建構」意味「經」作為「經」的「經義」往往是有待發現的、甚至是有待於建構的，因此，嚴格地區分《傳》、《箋》之訓詁是否合於文本義，凡不合之處，大多可以視為《傳》、《箋》的「經學建構」，而合於文本的部分，也可以分辨出《傳》、《箋》所新增的經學觀念，據此，便可描寫出《傳》、《箋》藉由解釋《詩經》所建構之經學思想的整體面貌；而「文本意識」則旨在描述相較於《傳》、《箋》建構經義時，種種違背文本意義的建構之外，或指認《詩經》文本性質的論述，或根據文本的性質來闡發《詩》義的自覺。並且進一步將此二概念加以推衍，也可以作為重新觀察中國經學史消長演替的一個視角：時代越晚，經學家的「文本意識」就愈發強烈，於是如何合理地在文本結構中闡發、傳承既有的深刻經學義理，便成為後來者任重道遠的新問題。本書除了緒論、結論以外，共分五章，前三章依次從經學、訓詁學與文獻學等方面，對《詩序》、《傳》、《箋》進行討論，嘗試較完整地理解其成書歷程、體例對其訓詁、解經觀念的影響，奠定後二章重新論證其「經學建構」與「文本意識」的基礎。第四章，討論《傳》、《箋》訓詁中的經學建構，主體部分以疏解其訓詁例證組成，並全面展示了《傳》、《箋》藉由訓詁所建構的經學思想之面貌。第五章，討論《傳》、《箋》訓詁中的「文本意識」，主要由訓詁例證的疏解組成，探討了《傳》、《箋》在訓詁中，對《詩經》文本特質的論述，以及「文本意識」對其訓詁的影響。

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798672144498Subjects--Topical Terms:

1183555
Asian literature.
Subjects--Index Terms:

毛詩Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Mao "Zhuan", Zheng "Jian" xun gu zhong de jing xiao jian gou yu wen ben yi shi = = The Construction of Classics and Text Consciousness in the Exegesis of Mao's Biography and Zheng's Notes.
LDR:09000ntm a22005657 4500 001 1144741
005 20240611104908.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2019 xx obm 000 0 chi d
020 $a 9798672144498
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28123022
035 $a (MiAaPQ)ntnuG060420009L
035 $a AAI28123022
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
066 $c $1
100 1 $6 880-01 $a Wang, Cheng-Yu. $3 1469873
245 1 0 $6 880-02 $a Mao "Zhuan", Zheng "Jian" xun gu zhong de jing xiao jian gou yu wen ben yi shi = $b The Construction of Classics and Text Consciousness in the Exegesis of Mao's Biography and Zheng's Notes.
246 3 1 $a Construction of Classics and Text Consciousness in the Exegesis of Mao's Biography and Zheng's Notes.
264 0 $c 2019
300 $a 1 online resource (444 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-07.
502 $a Thesis (Master's)--National Taiwan Normal University (Taiwan), 2019.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a 本書旨在研究《傳》、《箋》如何藉由解釋《詩經》而建構其經學思想？其建構的經學思想之整體面貌又為何？《傳》、《箋》是否只注重發揮經學思想，而罔顧文本？如果其並非全然罔顧文本，則在其建構經學思想的同時，發現並論述了《詩經》的哪些文本特質？其所認識的文本特質對其訓詁又有何影響？綜括地說，本書就是要藉由現存唯一部完整的漢代《詩經》注解，來展示《詩》如何被漢代訓詁學家建構成「經」，而在其被建構成「經」的同時，又開啟了哪些可能性？針對上述問題，本書嘗試提出《傳》與《箋》的訓詁中，其實存在兩個相輔相成的觀念與方法：「經學建構」、「文本意識」，這兩個概念是後設地建立在以下觀點而提出的：首先，應該重視訓詁中蘊含思想此一命題，並藉此重新觀察學術、思想史。其次，不合文義或錯誤的訓詁並非一無意義，反而可藉此探究訓詁學家不惜違啎文義也要闡發的經學思想。故「經學建構」意味「經」作為「經」的「經義」往往是有待發現的、甚至是有待於建構的，因此，嚴格地區分《傳》、《箋》之訓詁是否合於文本義，凡不合之處，大多可以視為《傳》、《箋》的「經學建構」，而合於文本的部分，也可以分辨出《傳》、《箋》所新增的經學觀念，據此，便可描寫出《傳》、《箋》藉由解釋《詩經》所建構之經學思想的整體面貌；而「文本意識」則旨在描述相較於《傳》、《箋》建構經義時，種種違背文本意義的建構之外，或指認《詩經》文本性質的論述，或根據文本的性質來闡發《詩》義的自覺。並且進一步將此二概念加以推衍，也可以作為重新觀察中國經學史消長演替的一個視角：時代越晚，經學家的「文本意識」就愈發強烈，於是如何合理地在文本結構中闡發、傳承既有的深刻經學義理，便成為後來者任重道遠的新問題。本書除了緒論、結論以外，共分五章，前三章依次從經學、訓詁學與文獻學等方面，對《詩序》、《傳》、《箋》進行討論，嘗試較完整地理解其成書歷程、體例對其訓詁、解經觀念的影響，奠定後二章重新論證其「經學建構」與「文本意識」的基礎。第四章，討論《傳》、《箋》訓詁中的經學建構，主體部分以疏解其訓詁例證組成，並全面展示了《傳》、《箋》藉由訓詁所建構的經學思想之面貌。第五章，討論《傳》、《箋》訓詁中的「文本意識」，主要由訓詁例證的疏解組成，探討了《傳》、《箋》在訓詁中，對《詩經》文本特質的論述，以及「文本意識」對其訓詁的影響。
520 $a The purpose of this book is to study how the "Biography" and "Jian" construct their thoughts on classics by interpreting the "Book of Songs". What is the overall appearance of the Confucian classics thought it constructs? Do the "Biography" and "Jian" only focus on the development of the thought of classics and ignore the text? If not completely disregarding the text, what textual characteristics of the Book of Songs did he discover and discuss while constructing his thoughts on classics? What are the influences of the characteristics of the texts he recognizes on his exegesis? To sum up, this book aims to demonstrate how the "Poem" was constructed by the exegesis scholars of the Han Dynasty as a "Classic" by means of the only existing complete annotation of the "Book of Songs" in the Han Dynasty, and at the same time as it was constructed as a "Classic". What possibilities have opened up? In response to the above problems, this book attempts to propose that there are actually two complementary concepts and methods in the exegesis of "Biography" and "Jian": "construction of classics" and "text consciousness". These two concepts are meta-established on the following viewpoints And put forward: First of all, we should pay attention to the proposition that the exegesis contains ideas, and use this to re-observe the history of academics and ideas. Secondly, the exegesis that is inconsistent with the text or wrong is not meaningless. On the contrary, it can be used to explore the thought of the classics that exegrators should expound even if they violate the text. Therefore, "construction of classics" means that the "jing" of "jing" as "jing" is often to be discovered, or even to be constructed. Therefore, it is strictly necessary to distinguish whether the exegesis of "Biography" and "Jian" is in line with the meaning of the text. , Any discrepancy can be regarded as the "construction of classics" in the "Biography" and "Jian", and the parts that are consistent with the text can also distinguish the new concepts of classics in the "Biography" and "Jian". , we can describe the overall appearance of the thought of classics constructed by Zhuan and Jian by interpreting the Book of Songs; and "text consciousness" aims to describe the construction of the meaning of the classics compared to Zhuan and Jian., in addition to various constructions that violate the meaning of the text, or to identify the textual nature of the "Book of Songs", or to elucidate the self-consciousness of the meaning of "The Book of Songs" according to the nature of the text. And further deduction of these two concepts can also be used as a perspective for re-observing the ebb and flow of the history of Chinese classics: the later the era, the stronger the "text consciousness" of the classics, so how to rationally interpret it in the text structure? , Inheriting the existing profound theories of classics has become a new problem with a long way to go for the latecomers. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this book is divided into five chapters. The first three chapters discuss the Preface to Poems, Biography, and Notes from the aspects of classics, exegesis, and philology in turn, and try to understand them more completely. The influence of the history and style of the book on its exegesis and interpretation of the Scriptures lays the foundation for re-arguing its "construction of classics" and "text consciousness" in the latter two chapters. The fourth chapter discusses the construction of classics in the exegesis of "Biography" and "Jian". The main part is composed of examples to explain their exegesis, and comprehensively shows the outlook of the thought of classics constructed by the exegesis of "Biography" and "Jian". The fifth chapter discusses the "text consciousness" in the exegesis of "Biography" and "Jian", which is mainly composed of the interpretation of exegesis examples. and the influence of "text awareness" on its exegesis.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Asian literature. $3 1183555
653 $a 毛詩
653 $a 詩經
653 $a 毛傳
653 $a 毛詩故訓傳
653 $a 鄭箋
653 $a 毛詩箋
653 $a 訓詁
653 $a 經學
653 $a Shi, Mai
653 $a Book of Songs
653 $a Mai biography
653 $a The Biography of Mao's Poetry
653 $a Jian, Zheng
653 $a Shijian, Mao
653 $a Exegesis
653 $a Classics
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0305
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a National Taiwan Normal University (Taiwan). $b Chinese. $3 1469862
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 82-07.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28123022 $z click for full text (PQDT)
880 1 $6 100-01/$1 $a 王誠御
880 1 0 $6 245-02/$1 $a 毛《傳》、鄭《箋》訓詁中的經學建構與文本意識 = $b The Construction of Classics and Text Consciousness in the Exegesis of Mao's Biography and Zheng's Notes.