國立虎尾科技大學 |

Qing chao zhi Tai guan yuan de "Luo han jiao" lun shu = = The "Lo-han-kha-a" Discourse of Officials Governing Taiwan in the Qing Dynasty.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Qing chao zhi Tai guan yuan de "Luo han jiao" lun shu =/
其他題名:	The "Lo-han-kha-a" Discourse of Officials Governing Taiwan in the Qing Dynasty.
其他題名:	"Lo-han-kha-a" Discourse of Officials Governing Taiwan in the Qing Dynasty.
作者:	Chu, Man-yun.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (49 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International84-05.
標題:	Asian history. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798352919545

Qing chao zhi Tai guan yuan de "Luo han jiao" lun shu = = The "Lo-han-kha-a" Discourse of Officials Governing Taiwan in the Qing Dynasty.
Chu, Man-yun.

Qing chao zhi Tai guan yuan de "Luo han jiao" lun shu =The "Lo-han-kha-a" Discourse of Officials Governing Taiwan in the Qing Dynasty."Lo-han-kha-a" Discourse of Officials Governing Taiwan in the Qing Dynasty. - 1 online resource (49 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05.

Thesis (M.A.)--National Taiwan Normal University (Taiwan), 2021.

Includes bibliographical references

清代臺灣歷史研究，時常將單一詞彙或概念套用到整個清治兩百年的期間。「羅漢腳」一詞的解釋亦有這樣的問題，釐清「羅漢腳」一詞的出現及其演變，即是這篇論文的目的。從乾隆27（1762）年的〈赤崁竹枝詞〉，和32（1767）年的「嚴禁棍徒藉屍嚇騙差查勒索碑」兩份史料說明「羅漢腳」一詞在臺灣出現的時機。進而探討「羅漢腳」一詞，如何被民間理解，又如何被立碑的官員運用，爬梳該詞彙出現的歷史脈絡。接著，以乾隆33（1768）年的黃教事件為中心。從官員處理這起事件的過程，到事件過後的善後報告，了解為何「羅漢腳」會與「社會動亂來源」拉上連結。乾隆中後期的臺灣出現多起社會動亂，在官員處理這些動亂的過程中，「羅漢腳」和社會動亂的連結已經定型。「羅漢腳」一詞隨著官員不斷用於描述動亂事件，故增加許多新的形象，並持續用於日後社會動亂的檢討報告。最後在道光13（1833）年，官員長期累積下來對於「羅漢腳」的各種負面形容，由陳盛韶整理記錄在《問俗錄》中。

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798352919545Subjects--Topical Terms:

810327
Asian history.
Subjects--Index Terms:

清代臺灣史Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Qing chao zhi Tai guan yuan de "Luo han jiao" lun shu = = The "Lo-han-kha-a" Discourse of Officials Governing Taiwan in the Qing Dynasty.
LDR:04610ntm a22004457 4500 001 1144771
005 20240611104915.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2021 xx obm 000 0 chi d
020 $a 9798352919545
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30179300
035 $a AAI30179300
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
066 $c $1
100 1 $6 880-01 $a Chu, Man-yun. $3 1469913
245 1 0 $6 880-02 $a Qing chao zhi Tai guan yuan de "Luo han jiao" lun shu = $b The "Lo-han-kha-a" Discourse of Officials Governing Taiwan in the Qing Dynasty.
246 3 1 $a "Lo-han-kha-a" Discourse of Officials Governing Taiwan in the Qing Dynasty.
264 0 $c 2021
300 $a 1 online resource (49 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05.
500 $a Advisor: 陳志豪 ;Chen, Chih-Hao.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--National Taiwan Normal University (Taiwan), 2021.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a 清代臺灣歷史研究，時常將單一詞彙或概念套用到整個清治兩百年的期間。「羅漢腳」一詞的解釋亦有這樣的問題，釐清「羅漢腳」一詞的出現及其演變，即是這篇論文的目的。從乾隆27（1762）年的〈赤崁竹枝詞〉，和32（1767）年的「嚴禁棍徒藉屍嚇騙差查勒索碑」兩份史料說明「羅漢腳」一詞在臺灣出現的時機。進而探討「羅漢腳」一詞，如何被民間理解，又如何被立碑的官員運用，爬梳該詞彙出現的歷史脈絡。接著，以乾隆33（1768）年的黃教事件為中心。從官員處理這起事件的過程，到事件過後的善後報告，了解為何「羅漢腳」會與「社會動亂來源」拉上連結。乾隆中後期的臺灣出現多起社會動亂，在官員處理這些動亂的過程中，「羅漢腳」和社會動亂的連結已經定型。「羅漢腳」一詞隨著官員不斷用於描述動亂事件，故增加許多新的形象，並持續用於日後社會動亂的檢討報告。最後在道光13（1833）年，官員長期累積下來對於「羅漢腳」的各種負面形容，由陳盛韶整理記錄在《問俗錄》中。
520 $a In the study of Taiwanese history in the Qing Dynasty, a single term or concept was often applied to the entire period of two hundred years of Qing rule. The interpretation of the term "Luohan feet" also has such problems. Clarifying the appearance and evolution of the term "Luohan feet" is the purpose of this paper. From the "Chikan Zhuzhi Ci" in the 27th (1762) year of Qianlong's reign, and the "Strictly Prohibiting Sticks Using Corpses to Intimidate, Defraud, and Extort the Monument" in the 32nd (1767) year of Qianlong's reign, the timing of the appearance of the term "Luohanjiao" in Taiwan is illustrated. Then discuss how the word "Luohan feet" is understood by the people, and how it is used by officials who erected monuments, and sort out the historical context of the word's emergence. Then, center on the Yellow Sect incident in the 33rd year of Qianlong (1768). From the process of officials handling this incident to the aftermath report after the incident, understand why "Arhat's feet" are linked to "sources of social unrest". There were many social turmoil in Taiwan in the middle and late Qianlong period. In the process of officials dealing with these turmoil, the connection between "arhat feet" and social turmoil has been finalized. As officials continue to use the term "Luo Han Jiao" to describe unrest, many new images have been added, and it will continue to be used in future review reports on social unrest. Finally, in the 13th year of Daoguang (1833), various negative descriptions of "arhat's feet" accumulated by officials for a long time were compiled and recorded by Chen Shengshao in "Wensulu".
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Asian history. $2 bicssc $3 810327
653 $a 清代臺灣史
653 $a 黃教事件
653 $a 問俗錄
653 $a Ask vulgar records
653 $a Yellow religion incident
653 $a History of Taiwan in the Qing dynasty
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0332
710 2 $a National Taiwan Normal University (Taiwan). $b Department of History. $3 1469908
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 84-05.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30179300 $z click for full text (PQDT)
880 1 $6 100-01/$1 $a 朱曼云.
880 1 0 $6 245-02/$1 $a 清朝治臺官員的「羅漢腳」論述 = $b The "Lo-han-kha-a" Discourse of Officials Governing Taiwan in the Qing Dynasty.