國立虎尾科技大學 |

Thermal Properties of Commonly Used Clear Aligner Systems As-Received and After Clinical Use.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Thermal Properties of Commonly Used Clear Aligner Systems As-Received and After Clinical Use./
作者:	Wenger, Louis.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (43 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International79-03.
標題:	Dentistry. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355104417

Thermal Properties of Commonly Used Clear Aligner Systems As-Received and After Clinical Use.
Wenger, Louis.

Thermal Properties of Commonly Used Clear Aligner Systems As-Received and After Clinical Use. - 1 online resource (43 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03.

Thesis (M.S.)--Marquette University, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

Background/Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the thermal properties, particularly glass transition temperature, of the polymers that are used to fabricate three different types of modern orthodontic aligners. Invisalign, (Align Technology, Inc, Santa Clara, CA, USA), Simpli5 (Allesee Orthodontic Appliances, Sturtevant, WI, USA), and ClearCorrect (ClearCorrect, Round Rock, TX, USA) were examined both as-received and after clinical use to determine if any differences were present both between and within aligners. Materials/Methods: Orthodontic aligners were collected from three different patients using the systems under investigation after two weeks of intraoral use. Duplicate, un-used samples were obtained from the manufacturers for direct comparison. The aligners were then sectioned into sizes that were compatible with the instrumentation being used to analyze them. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) was used to individually analyze the thermal properties of each sample. The resulting thermograms were then compared to investigate potential differences between brands and conditions. Of particular interest was the temperature at which each polymer went through the glass transition phase. Enthalpy relaxation, recrystallization temperature, and melting point were also analyzed. Results: There was no statistical difference in glass transition temperature between as-received and after use Invisalign, ClearCorrect, or Simpli5 aligners (p>0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in recrystallization peak and recrystallization enthalpy between as-received and after use Simpli5 aligners (p>0.05). There was a significant decrease in melting peak and melting enthalpy between as-received and after use Simpli5 aligners (p<0.05). A lack of recrystallization and melting peaks indicates that Invisalign and ClearCorrect are a thermoset material while the presence of these peaks indicates that Simpli5 is thermoplastic. All materials possessed a glass transition temperature above the maximum temperature that is found intraorally. Conclusions: Glass transition temperature did not significantly change after clinical use in the tested orthodontic aligners, indicating the stability of this property throughout normal treatment. All three types have a glass transition temperature above the maximum temperature that is found intraorally, which has been shown to be a benefit to an aligner's mechanical properties. Melting peak and melting enthalpy showed a small decrease after use in Simpli5, indicating some structural aging intraorally.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355104417Subjects--Topical Terms:

674038
Dentistry.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Thermal Properties of Commonly Used Clear Aligner Systems As-Received and After Clinical Use.
LDR:03845ntm a22003377 4500 001 1145408
005 20240624103641.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355104417
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10604303
035 $a (MiAaPQ)marquette:11233
035 $a AAI10604303
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Wenger, Louis. $3 1437600
245 1 0 $a Thermal Properties of Commonly Used Clear Aligner Systems As-Received and After Clinical Use.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (43 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Berzins, David.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Marquette University, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Background/Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the thermal properties, particularly glass transition temperature, of the polymers that are used to fabricate three different types of modern orthodontic aligners. Invisalign, (Align Technology, Inc, Santa Clara, CA, USA), Simpli5 (Allesee Orthodontic Appliances, Sturtevant, WI, USA), and ClearCorrect (ClearCorrect, Round Rock, TX, USA) were examined both as-received and after clinical use to determine if any differences were present both between and within aligners. Materials/Methods: Orthodontic aligners were collected from three different patients using the systems under investigation after two weeks of intraoral use. Duplicate, un-used samples were obtained from the manufacturers for direct comparison. The aligners were then sectioned into sizes that were compatible with the instrumentation being used to analyze them. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) was used to individually analyze the thermal properties of each sample. The resulting thermograms were then compared to investigate potential differences between brands and conditions. Of particular interest was the temperature at which each polymer went through the glass transition phase. Enthalpy relaxation, recrystallization temperature, and melting point were also analyzed. Results: There was no statistical difference in glass transition temperature between as-received and after use Invisalign, ClearCorrect, or Simpli5 aligners (p>0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in recrystallization peak and recrystallization enthalpy between as-received and after use Simpli5 aligners (p>0.05). There was a significant decrease in melting peak and melting enthalpy between as-received and after use Simpli5 aligners (p<0.05). A lack of recrystallization and melting peaks indicates that Invisalign and ClearCorrect are a thermoset material while the presence of these peaks indicates that Simpli5 is thermoplastic. All materials possessed a glass transition temperature above the maximum temperature that is found intraorally. Conclusions: Glass transition temperature did not significantly change after clinical use in the tested orthodontic aligners, indicating the stability of this property throughout normal treatment. All three types have a glass transition temperature above the maximum temperature that is found intraorally, which has been shown to be a benefit to an aligner's mechanical properties. Melting peak and melting enthalpy showed a small decrease after use in Simpli5, indicating some structural aging intraorally.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Dentistry. $3 674038
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0567
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Marquette University. $b Dentistry. $3 1437601
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 79-03.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10604303 $z click for full text (PQDT)