國立虎尾科技大學 |

Why Businesses Oppose War.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Why Businesses Oppose War./
作者:	Kirss, Alexander.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (332 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-03A.
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798845459046

Why Businesses Oppose War.
Kirss, Alexander.

Why Businesses Oppose War. - 1 online resource (332 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The George Washington University, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Business pressure is believed to be a key mechanism linking economic interdependence to interstate peace, and yet historically not all businesses have opposed war. Why? Existing explanations for business opposition to war mainly try to explain business preferences about conflict through the lens of international trade. Since war ruptures trade, the argument goes, businesses that support free trade will oppose war while those who oppose free trade will not oppose war. Unfortunately, this argument cannot explain many important cases of business war preferences. These puzzles can be easily resolved through a simple-yet powerful-addition to existing theories of business opposition to war. In this dissertation I argue that a business's opposition to war is jointly determined by two factors, their trade orientation and conflict relevance, rather than simply reflecting their trade policy preferences. I test this theory using a mixed methods approach consisting of comparative case studies of the American wheat and cotton industries during World War I and quantitative survey evidence from American business leaders during World War I and the Vietnam War. I find that my additive theory of business opposition to war better predicts and explains business war preferences in these conflicts than existing theories. My theory and empirical findings are not only relevant for future research on business war preferences and businesses' role in foreign security policy, but also for contemporary business and political leaders.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798845459046Subjects--Topical Terms:

558774
Political science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Business opposition to warIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Why Businesses Oppose War.
LDR:02848ntm a22003737 4500 001 1145624
005 20240711091733.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798845459046
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29324337
035 $a AAI29324337
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Kirss, Alexander. $3 1470801
245 1 0 $a Why Businesses Oppose War.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (332 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-03, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Glaser, Charles L.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The George Washington University, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Business pressure is believed to be a key mechanism linking economic interdependence to interstate peace, and yet historically not all businesses have opposed war. Why? Existing explanations for business opposition to war mainly try to explain business preferences about conflict through the lens of international trade. Since war ruptures trade, the argument goes, businesses that support free trade will oppose war while those who oppose free trade will not oppose war. Unfortunately, this argument cannot explain many important cases of business war preferences. These puzzles can be easily resolved through a simple-yet powerful-addition to existing theories of business opposition to war. In this dissertation I argue that a business's opposition to war is jointly determined by two factors, their trade orientation and conflict relevance, rather than simply reflecting their trade policy preferences. I test this theory using a mixed methods approach consisting of comparative case studies of the American wheat and cotton industries during World War I and quantitative survey evidence from American business leaders during World War I and the Vietnam War. I find that my additive theory of business opposition to war better predicts and explains business war preferences in these conflicts than existing theories. My theory and empirical findings are not only relevant for future research on business war preferences and businesses' role in foreign security policy, but also for contemporary business and political leaders.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Political science. $3 558774
653 $a Business opposition to war
653 $a Political economy of security
653 $a Vietnam War businesses
653 $a World War I businesses
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0601
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a The George Washington University. $b Political Science. $3 1183595
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-03A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29324337 $z click for full text (PQDT)