國立虎尾科技大學 |

Asymmetric statecraft : = Alliances, competitors, and regional diplomacy in Asia and Europe.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Asymmetric statecraft :/
其他題名:	Alliances, competitors, and regional diplomacy in Asia and Europe.
作者:	Huang, Yuxing.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (250 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 77-11, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International77-11A.
標題:	Asian history. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781339660257

Asymmetric statecraft : = Alliances, competitors, and regional diplomacy in Asia and Europe.
Huang, Yuxing.

Asymmetric statecraft :Alliances, competitors, and regional diplomacy in Asia and Europe. - 1 online resource (250 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 77-11, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston College, 2016.

Includes bibliographical references

Traditional theories of foreign policy that focus on external threats, domestic politics, and ideology explain why a great power exerts pressures or seeks compromises with one weaker neighbor, but they do not adequately address the fact that a great power usually deals with several weaker powers in a region. This dissertation explores new and important questions: Why does a great power sometimes treat multiple weaker neighbors in generally the same way, but sometimes attempts to differentiate among weaker neighbors through selective concessions or targeted coercion? In other words, why does a great power adopt uniform strategies or selective strategies? The dissertation introduces a Regional Competitor Approach, arguing that the number of regional competitors and their respective alignment relationships determine whether a great power deals with weaker powers under a sweeping general strategy or adopts distinctive policies toward them. If there is one regional competitor, a great power adopts uniform strategies towards weaker non-allies to convey a consistent message to the competitor, but selective strategies towards weaker allies to solve collective action problems. If the number of regional competitors increases , a great power adopts selective strategies towards weaker non-allies to maintain its power advantages vis-a-vis the weaker powers, but uniform strategies towards weaker allies to solve commitment problems. The dissertation elaborates new concepts, develops a new approach against competing theories, and challenges existing historical accounts based upon newly available evidence. The dissertation examines four cases: (a) China's East Asia policy, 1955-1965; (b) China's South Asia policy, 1955-1963; (c) China's Indochina policy, 1962-1975; and (d) French, German, and Russian strategies toward Eastern Europe, 1919-1941. In the first three cases, I seek to explain how the United States and the Soviet Union shaped China's asymmetric statecraft in Cold War Asia. The final case allows me to compare and contrast the approaches of China and European great powers. The above case studies draw upon a wealth of evidence from American, Chinese, German and Russian archives. Unpublished archives include the Chinese Foreign Ministry Archive, provincial or municipal archives in China, Nixon and Ford Presidential Libraries, NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) Archives, and libraries in China and North America.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781339660257Subjects--Topical Terms:

810327
Asian history.
Subjects--Index Terms:

AllianceIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Asymmetric statecraft : = Alliances, competitors, and regional diplomacy in Asia and Europe.
LDR:03939ntm a22004457 4500 001 1145764
005 20240711091207.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2016 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781339660257
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10102211
035 $a (MiAaPQ)bc:11305
035 $a AAI10102211
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Huang, Yuxing. $3 1185469
245 1 0 $a Asymmetric statecraft : $b Alliances, competitors, and regional diplomacy in Asia and Europe.
264 0 $c 2016
300 $a 1 online resource (250 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 77-11, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Ross, Robert S.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston College, 2016.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Traditional theories of foreign policy that focus on external threats, domestic politics, and ideology explain why a great power exerts pressures or seeks compromises with one weaker neighbor, but they do not adequately address the fact that a great power usually deals with several weaker powers in a region. This dissertation explores new and important questions: Why does a great power sometimes treat multiple weaker neighbors in generally the same way, but sometimes attempts to differentiate among weaker neighbors through selective concessions or targeted coercion? In other words, why does a great power adopt uniform strategies or selective strategies? The dissertation introduces a Regional Competitor Approach, arguing that the number of regional competitors and their respective alignment relationships determine whether a great power deals with weaker powers under a sweeping general strategy or adopts distinctive policies toward them. If there is one regional competitor, a great power adopts uniform strategies towards weaker non-allies to convey a consistent message to the competitor, but selective strategies towards weaker allies to solve collective action problems. If the number of regional competitors increases , a great power adopts selective strategies towards weaker non-allies to maintain its power advantages vis-a-vis the weaker powers, but uniform strategies towards weaker allies to solve commitment problems. The dissertation elaborates new concepts, develops a new approach against competing theories, and challenges existing historical accounts based upon newly available evidence. The dissertation examines four cases: (a) China's East Asia policy, 1955-1965; (b) China's South Asia policy, 1955-1963; (c) China's Indochina policy, 1962-1975; and (d) French, German, and Russian strategies toward Eastern Europe, 1919-1941. In the first three cases, I seek to explain how the United States and the Soviet Union shaped China's asymmetric statecraft in Cold War Asia. The final case allows me to compare and contrast the approaches of China and European great powers. The above case studies draw upon a wealth of evidence from American, Chinese, German and Russian archives. Unpublished archives include the Chinese Foreign Ministry Archive, provincial or municipal archives in China, Nixon and Ford Presidential Libraries, NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) Archives, and libraries in China and North America.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Asian history. $2 bicssc $3 810327
650 4 $a Political science. $3 558774
650 4 $a European history. $2 bicssc $3 934485
650 4 $a History. $3 669538
653 $a Alliance
653 $a Asia
653 $a Asymmetric statecraft
653 $a China
653 $a Europe
653 $a Regional diplomacy
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0332
690 $a 0335
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0578
710 2 $a Boston College. $b Political Science. $3 1470977
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 77-11A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10102211 $z click for full text (PQDT)