國立虎尾科技大學 |

Socializing science : = On the epistemic significance of the institutional context of science.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Socializing science :/
其他題名:	On the epistemic significance of the institutional context of science.
作者:	Biddle, Justin B.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (276 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 71-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International71-12A.
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781109757156

Socializing science : = On the epistemic significance of the institutional context of science.
Biddle, Justin B.

Socializing science :On the epistemic significance of the institutional context of science. - 1 online resource (276 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 71-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Notre Dame, 2006.

Includes bibliographical references

Science is a social activity. About this much, everyone agrees. Disagreement arises, however, with the attempt to explicate the precise manner in which science is social and the precise ways in which scientific communities should be organized. This dissertation addresses these two issues. In the first part of this dissertation, I argue that scientific knowledge is intrinsically social; that is, the development of scientific knowledge requires communities, and the decisions that communities make-regarding both the choices of problems and the epistemic evaluation of research-are inevitably influenced by their broader social contexts. In some areas of science, furthermore, moral and political values inevitably influence the epistemic evaluation of research. I defend this claim against the objection that only the practical-and not the epistemic-evaluation of research is legitimately influenced by such values. Given that scientific knowledge is intrinsically social, the question of how research should be organized takes on added epistemic significance. If the development of scientific knowledge requires communities, one must begin to spell out which communities are knowledge-productive and which are not. The second part of the dissertation is an attempt to do this, particularly in the area of pharmaceutical research. Due to the increasing involvement of for-profit companies in biomedical research, the organization of this research is changing dramatically, in ways that are presenting serious ethical and epistemic costs. The question of how these organizational arrangements should be improved is not only an important public policy issue, but also an important epistemological one. To begin to address this issue, I discuss a recent episode of pharmaceutical research, involving Vioxx, and I highlight some of the organizational inadequacies that led to this debacle. A crucial lesson of the Vioxx case is the need for enforcing organized skepticism. I discuss one potential way of doing this-through an adversarial system of research-according to which competing sets of scientific advocacy groups argue for opposing positions before a panel of scientist-judges. While this proposal is not completely developed, it is a pursuit-worthy one that merits further discussion.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781109757156Subjects--Topical Terms:

559771
Philosophy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Privatization of scienceIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Socializing science : = On the epistemic significance of the institutional context of science.
LDR:03605ntm a22003497 4500 001 1145889
005 20240711091249.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2006 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781109757156
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3406963
035 $a AAI3406963
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Biddle, Justin B. $3 1471170
245 1 0 $a Socializing science : $b On the epistemic significance of the institutional context of science.
264 0 $c 2006
300 $a 1 online resource (276 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 71-12, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Howard, Don A.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Notre Dame, 2006.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Science is a social activity. About this much, everyone agrees. Disagreement arises, however, with the attempt to explicate the precise manner in which science is social and the precise ways in which scientific communities should be organized. This dissertation addresses these two issues. In the first part of this dissertation, I argue that scientific knowledge is intrinsically social; that is, the development of scientific knowledge requires communities, and the decisions that communities make-regarding both the choices of problems and the epistemic evaluation of research-are inevitably influenced by their broader social contexts. In some areas of science, furthermore, moral and political values inevitably influence the epistemic evaluation of research. I defend this claim against the objection that only the practical-and not the epistemic-evaluation of research is legitimately influenced by such values. Given that scientific knowledge is intrinsically social, the question of how research should be organized takes on added epistemic significance. If the development of scientific knowledge requires communities, one must begin to spell out which communities are knowledge-productive and which are not. The second part of the dissertation is an attempt to do this, particularly in the area of pharmaceutical research. Due to the increasing involvement of for-profit companies in biomedical research, the organization of this research is changing dramatically, in ways that are presenting serious ethical and epistemic costs. The question of how these organizational arrangements should be improved is not only an important public policy issue, but also an important epistemological one. To begin to address this issue, I discuss a recent episode of pharmaceutical research, involving Vioxx, and I highlight some of the organizational inadequacies that led to this debacle. A crucial lesson of the Vioxx case is the need for enforcing organized skepticism. I discuss one potential way of doing this-through an adversarial system of research-according to which competing sets of scientific advocacy groups argue for opposing positions before a panel of scientist-judges. While this proposal is not completely developed, it is a pursuit-worthy one that merits further discussion.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 559771
653 $a Privatization of science
653 $a Social epistemology
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0422
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Notre Dame. $3 845534
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 71-12A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3406963 $z click for full text (PQDT)