國立虎尾科技大學 |

Phoneme Similarity in English and Mandarin Chinese Language Production.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Phoneme Similarity in English and Mandarin Chinese Language Production./
作者:	Chen, Mo.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (109 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International85-01.
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798379895617

Phoneme Similarity in English and Mandarin Chinese Language Production.
Chen, Mo.

Phoneme Similarity in English and Mandarin Chinese Language Production. - 1 online resource (109 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01.

Thesis (M.S.)--Lehigh University, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

Despite general agreement on the main stages of language production, the stage of phonetic encoding and articulation remains understudied. To shed light on this neglected component, more specifically the interaction of phonological units and articulatory features, this thesis studied the effects of initial phoneme similarity in controlled word-pair production experiments. I comprehensively examined the cost of different feature type differences in word onsets in parallel English and Mandarin Chinese word pair production experiments while also varying phonological contexts (presence or absence of shared rhyme segments). Monosyllabic word pairs were produced using a cued word-order procedure that requires the generation of phonology immediately before speaking. I predicted phoneme similarity costs for all features in both languages. The rhymed context should have more cost than the unrhymed context but keep the same pattern across features. Competition indexed by slower speech initiation latencies and increased errors was present in both rhymed (e.g., birch-perch, 笔(bi3)-皮(pi2)) and unrhymed (e.g., bog-pouch 部(bu4)-帕(pa4)) related conditions in both languages. Surprisingly, for unrhymed word pairs, place was the most influential feature in both languages. For rhymed word pairs, all features were important, place remained the most robust effect in Chinese, but voice was the strongest feature in English. Error patterns were broadly consistent with the response time data. I conclude that the phoneme similarity effect operates both in a syllable-centric (Chinese) as well as a phoneme-centric (English) phonological system, suggesting a limited role for earlier production stages.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798379895617Subjects--Topical Terms:

557829
Linguistics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

EnglishIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Phoneme Similarity in English and Mandarin Chinese Language Production.
LDR:03015ntm a22003857 4500 001 1146117
005 20240711092045.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798379895617
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30486364
035 $a AAI30486364
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Chen, Mo. $3 1190632
245 1 0 $a Phoneme Similarity in English and Mandarin Chinese Language Production.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (109 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01.
500 $a Advisor: O'Seaghdha, Padraig G.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Lehigh University, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Despite general agreement on the main stages of language production, the stage of phonetic encoding and articulation remains understudied. To shed light on this neglected component, more specifically the interaction of phonological units and articulatory features, this thesis studied the effects of initial phoneme similarity in controlled word-pair production experiments. I comprehensively examined the cost of different feature type differences in word onsets in parallel English and Mandarin Chinese word pair production experiments while also varying phonological contexts (presence or absence of shared rhyme segments). Monosyllabic word pairs were produced using a cued word-order procedure that requires the generation of phonology immediately before speaking. I predicted phoneme similarity costs for all features in both languages. The rhymed context should have more cost than the unrhymed context but keep the same pattern across features. Competition indexed by slower speech initiation latencies and increased errors was present in both rhymed (e.g., birch-perch, 笔(bi3)-皮(pi2)) and unrhymed (e.g., bog-pouch 部(bu4)-帕(pa4)) related conditions in both languages. Surprisingly, for unrhymed word pairs, place was the most influential feature in both languages. For rhymed word pairs, all features were important, place remained the most robust effect in Chinese, but voice was the strongest feature in English. Error patterns were broadly consistent with the response time data. I conclude that the phoneme similarity effect operates both in a syllable-centric (Chinese) as well as a phoneme-centric (English) phonological system, suggesting a limited role for earlier production stages.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 557829
650 4 $a Language. $3 571568
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 556029
653 $a English
653 $a Language production
653 $a Mandarin
653 $a Phoneme similarity effect
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0679
690 $a 0290
710 2 $a Lehigh University. $b Psychology. $3 1471455
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 85-01.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30486364 $z click for full text (PQDT)