國立虎尾科技大學 |

Exploring Variation in Cash Assistance : = How Lump Sum Versus Regular Payments Relate to Families' Food Insecurity and Psychological Well-Being.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Exploring Variation in Cash Assistance :/
其他題名:	How Lump Sum Versus Regular Payments Relate to Families' Food Insecurity and Psychological Well-Being.
作者:	Steimle, Samantha.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (326 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-12B.
標題:	Mental health. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798382965451

Exploring Variation in Cash Assistance : = How Lump Sum Versus Regular Payments Relate to Families' Food Insecurity and Psychological Well-Being.
Steimle, Samantha.

Exploring Variation in Cash Assistance :How Lump Sum Versus Regular Payments Relate to Families' Food Insecurity and Psychological Well-Being. - 1 online resource (326 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2024.

Includes bibliographical references

Income is one of the strongest predictors of child development, with insufficient funds for basic needs undermining the well-being of children and parents alike. In the context of high child poverty rates in the U.S. and soaring rates of food insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is essential to explore ways to mitigate the harmful sequelae of low-income. Cash assistance represents one promising solution; however, questions remain regarding the best way to deliver cash to families. A lump sum payment, which delivers a large amount of money at once, could reduce the economic and psychological hardships associated with being low-income immediately, but these effects would likely fade as the money is spent. In contrast, a series of smaller payments delivered regularly may have smaller initial effects on family well-being but would likely last longer. This dissertation investigates how the lump sum, economic stimulus payments and monthly, Child Tax Credit (CTC) payments delivered during the pandemic relate to two indicators of family well-being, food insecurity and psychological distress, in the months following receipt.I find that both forms of cash predicted lower food insecurity; stimulus payments were associated with reductions in severe food insecurity that faded over time, whereas CTC payments inconsistently predicted declines within and across months. I also find that both payment forms were associated with decreases in parents' psychological distress, though again these findings were more consistent with stimulus checks. Moreover, reductions in parent distress were partially mediated by food insecurity, with more consistent mediation evidence for stimulus checks. Children's psychological distress, conversely, was largely unaffected by cash receipt and was instead explained by changes in COVID-related restrictions. Overall, these results suggest that a lump sum allows families to address a wider breadth of economic needs, which is psychologically relieving to parents, while regular payments need to be large enough to have consistent longer-term effects. Accordingly, policymakers should consider using lump sums during times of intense economic need and regular payments during times of relative economic stability. In doing so, we can optimally use limited government dollars in ways that maximize the well-being of low-income children and families.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798382965451Subjects--Topical Terms:

564038
Mental health.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Cash assistanceIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Exploring Variation in Cash Assistance : = How Lump Sum Versus Regular Payments Relate to Families' Food Insecurity and Psychological Well-Being.
LDR:03906ntm a22004337 4500 001 1146729
005 20240812064724.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2024 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798382965451
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31329624
035 $a AAI31329624
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Steimle, Samantha. $3 1472186
245 1 0 $a Exploring Variation in Cash Assistance : $b How Lump Sum Versus Regular Payments Relate to Families' Food Insecurity and Psychological Well-Being.
264 0 $c 2024
300 $a 1 online resource (326 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Ryan, Rebecca M.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2024.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Income is one of the strongest predictors of child development, with insufficient funds for basic needs undermining the well-being of children and parents alike. In the context of high child poverty rates in the U.S. and soaring rates of food insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is essential to explore ways to mitigate the harmful sequelae of low-income. Cash assistance represents one promising solution; however, questions remain regarding the best way to deliver cash to families. A lump sum payment, which delivers a large amount of money at once, could reduce the economic and psychological hardships associated with being low-income immediately, but these effects would likely fade as the money is spent. In contrast, a series of smaller payments delivered regularly may have smaller initial effects on family well-being but would likely last longer. This dissertation investigates how the lump sum, economic stimulus payments and monthly, Child Tax Credit (CTC) payments delivered during the pandemic relate to two indicators of family well-being, food insecurity and psychological distress, in the months following receipt.I find that both forms of cash predicted lower food insecurity; stimulus payments were associated with reductions in severe food insecurity that faded over time, whereas CTC payments inconsistently predicted declines within and across months. I also find that both payment forms were associated with decreases in parents' psychological distress, though again these findings were more consistent with stimulus checks. Moreover, reductions in parent distress were partially mediated by food insecurity, with more consistent mediation evidence for stimulus checks. Children's psychological distress, conversely, was largely unaffected by cash receipt and was instead explained by changes in COVID-related restrictions. Overall, these results suggest that a lump sum allows families to address a wider breadth of economic needs, which is psychologically relieving to parents, while regular payments need to be large enough to have consistent longer-term effects. Accordingly, policymakers should consider using lump sums during times of intense economic need and regular payments during times of relative economic stability. In doing so, we can optimally use limited government dollars in ways that maximize the well-being of low-income children and families.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Mental health. $3 564038
650 4 $a Individual & family studies. $3 1181440
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 555998
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 1002398
650 4 $a Developmental psychology. $3 557458
653 $a Cash assistance
653 $a Family well-being
653 $a Food insecurity
653 $a Pandemic policy
653 $a Psychological well-being
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0620
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0347
690 $a 0628
690 $a 0272
710 2 $a Georgetown University. $b Psychology. $3 1472187
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-12B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31329624 $z click for full text (PQDT)