國立虎尾科技大學 |

The Relationship Between Bone Quality and Muscle Performance in Cross Country and Track and Field Athletes.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The Relationship Between Bone Quality and Muscle Performance in Cross Country and Track and Field Athletes./
Author:	Allen, Shawn Michael Flanagin.
Description:	1 online resource (59 pages)
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International85-02.
Subject:	Kinesiology. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798380080651

The Relationship Between Bone Quality and Muscle Performance in Cross Country and Track and Field Athletes.
Allen, Shawn Michael Flanagin.

The Relationship Between Bone Quality and Muscle Performance in Cross Country and Track and Field Athletes. - 1 online resource (59 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02.

Thesis (M.S.)--Oklahoma State University, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

Introduction: Cross-Country and Track and field (XC+T&F) athletes exhibit high levels of lower body bone injuries compared to other collegiate athletes, as well as lower levels of areal bone mineral density (aBMD). Lower aBMD has been associated with increased frequency and severity of bone injuries. The best none pharmaceutical way of increasing aBMD and reducing these injury risks are through physical training. Both strength and power movements have both been shown to elicit these increased bone mineral density adaptations, but which one of these are a better stimulus? Our study looks to fill this gap of knowledge by looking evaluating both power and strength muscle output and characterizes and their ability to predict total body and site-specific bone mineral density values. Methods: Thirty-three XC+T&F athletes provided informed consent followed by an injury and activity questionnaire. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to access body composition and aBMD, prior to this, athletes conducted a urine analysis for hydration status and height and weight measurements. Unilateral dynamic knee extension and flexion of both legs were measures by a Biodex 3. Athletes completed three repetitions at 60, 120 and 180°/sec; these speeds are clinically associated with strength, mixed, and power, respectively. Independent t-tests were used to assess initial differences between XC+T&F sex baseline characteristics. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated to inform independent variables suitability for regression modeling. Forced linear regression modeling evaluated if strength only or power only models accounted for the greatest amount of variance in total body and 4 site-specific aBMD area, as well as three hip structural analysis measures. Results: Both strength and power regression models were able to account for variance within ranges of 21.0-59.4% ± 9.6% (all p≤0.005), but power was able to not only predict the greatest number of variables with significance, but it also had the greatest magnitude of variance that could be accounted for. Power models provided an additional 9.2-25% ± 7.9% increase for accounting for variance over strength models. Conclusion: Power training may be a better modality for training over strength, for both athletes and clinical populations that are pursuing greater aBMD adaptations.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798380080651Subjects--Topical Terms:

721210
Kinesiology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Bone mineral densityIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

The Relationship Between Bone Quality and Muscle Performance in Cross Country and Track and Field Athletes.
LDR:03677ntm a22003737 4500 001 1146806
005 20240812065016.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798380080651
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30485173
035 $a AAI30485173
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Allen, Shawn Michael Flanagin. $3 1472289
245 1 4 $a The Relationship Between Bone Quality and Muscle Performance in Cross Country and Track and Field Athletes.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (59 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02.
500 $a Advisor: Baker, Breanne.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Oklahoma State University, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Introduction: Cross-Country and Track and field (XC+T&F) athletes exhibit high levels of lower body bone injuries compared to other collegiate athletes, as well as lower levels of areal bone mineral density (aBMD). Lower aBMD has been associated with increased frequency and severity of bone injuries. The best none pharmaceutical way of increasing aBMD and reducing these injury risks are through physical training. Both strength and power movements have both been shown to elicit these increased bone mineral density adaptations, but which one of these are a better stimulus? Our study looks to fill this gap of knowledge by looking evaluating both power and strength muscle output and characterizes and their ability to predict total body and site-specific bone mineral density values. Methods: Thirty-three XC+T&F athletes provided informed consent followed by an injury and activity questionnaire. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to access body composition and aBMD, prior to this, athletes conducted a urine analysis for hydration status and height and weight measurements. Unilateral dynamic knee extension and flexion of both legs were measures by a Biodex 3. Athletes completed three repetitions at 60, 120 and 180°/sec; these speeds are clinically associated with strength, mixed, and power, respectively. Independent t-tests were used to assess initial differences between XC+T&F sex baseline characteristics. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated to inform independent variables suitability for regression modeling. Forced linear regression modeling evaluated if strength only or power only models accounted for the greatest amount of variance in total body and 4 site-specific aBMD area, as well as three hip structural analysis measures. Results: Both strength and power regression models were able to account for variance within ranges of 21.0-59.4% ± 9.6% (all p≤0.005), but power was able to not only predict the greatest number of variables with significance, but it also had the greatest magnitude of variance that could be accounted for. Power models provided an additional 9.2-25% ± 7.9% increase for accounting for variance over strength models. Conclusion: Power training may be a better modality for training over strength, for both athletes and clinical populations that are pursuing greater aBMD adaptations.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Kinesiology. $3 721210
650 4 $a Health sciences. $3 1179212
653 $a Bone mineral density
653 $a Injury protection
653 $a Power
653 $a Strength
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0575
690 $a 0566
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Oklahoma State University. $b Health & Human Performance (MS). $3 1472204
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 85-02.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30485173 $z click for full text (PQDT)