國立虎尾科技大學 |

Rethinking Power Dynamics in Software Tools for Artists.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Rethinking Power Dynamics in Software Tools for Artists./
Author:	Li, Jingyi.
Description:	1 online resource (131 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-06B.
Subject:	Software development. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798381019681

Rethinking Power Dynamics in Software Tools for Artists.
Li, Jingyi.

Rethinking Power Dynamics in Software Tools for Artists. - 1 online resource (131 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

Computation has become an essential tool for art and design. Yet many creative software tools limit users to preset options and filters, which may be restrictive for professional artists who have unique goals and workflows. While artists can learn to code to circumvent this preset functionality, the structured and abstract nature of programming is in tension with the exploratory and concrete nature of visual art making. From Photoshop to Processing, tools give artists the power to create, but the designers of such tools also exert power over artists by dictating what is available to them.This dissertation offers three contributions towards understanding, enabling, and questioning power relationships in software tools for visual art. First, through a thematic analysis of interviews with over a dozen professional artists, I show that pre-existing software tools are most powerful when they enable fine grain aesthetic control and adaptable to artists' idiosyncratic workflows, and that artists learn to program their own tools to gain various forms of power. Second, to support visual artists in programming, I present the Demystified Dynamic Brushes (DDB) system. DDB is a creative coding environment that visualizes program information on the ongoing artwork and grounds debugging interactions with stylus inputs, giving artists the power to understand their programs in a way aligned with their existing expertise. Finally, I argue that the traditional way software tools empower their users-through defining abstractions and representations that align with user needs-also disempower them by exerting a "normative ground" that structures and limits how users can and should act, think, and express themselves. Backed by interviews with creative practitioners and tool designers, I build a preliminary theory of how power relationships manifest in creativity support tools, and what tool designers can do, both technically and methodologically, to mitigate imbalances in power relationships.Taken together, it is my goal to show that supporting creative practices beyond accomplishing tasks with more efficiency or lower mental load--supporting wonderful creative practices that are unpredictable, emergent, and messy-means taking power relationships-and creative practitioners themselves-more seriously in software design.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798381019681Subjects--Topical Terms:

1472595
Software development.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Rethinking Power Dynamics in Software Tools for Artists.
LDR:03562ntm a22003377 4500 001 1147005
005 20240819061928.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798381019681
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30726911
035 $a (MiAaPQ)STANFORDxf605mk2773
035 $a AAI30726911
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Li, Jingyi. $3 1472594
245 1 0 $a Rethinking Power Dynamics in Software Tools for Artists.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (131 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Agrawala, Maneesh;Follmer, Sean.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Computation has become an essential tool for art and design. Yet many creative software tools limit users to preset options and filters, which may be restrictive for professional artists who have unique goals and workflows. While artists can learn to code to circumvent this preset functionality, the structured and abstract nature of programming is in tension with the exploratory and concrete nature of visual art making. From Photoshop to Processing, tools give artists the power to create, but the designers of such tools also exert power over artists by dictating what is available to them.This dissertation offers three contributions towards understanding, enabling, and questioning power relationships in software tools for visual art. First, through a thematic analysis of interviews with over a dozen professional artists, I show that pre-existing software tools are most powerful when they enable fine grain aesthetic control and adaptable to artists' idiosyncratic workflows, and that artists learn to program their own tools to gain various forms of power. Second, to support visual artists in programming, I present the Demystified Dynamic Brushes (DDB) system. DDB is a creative coding environment that visualizes program information on the ongoing artwork and grounds debugging interactions with stylus inputs, giving artists the power to understand their programs in a way aligned with their existing expertise. Finally, I argue that the traditional way software tools empower their users-through defining abstractions and representations that align with user needs-also disempower them by exerting a "normative ground" that structures and limits how users can and should act, think, and express themselves. Backed by interviews with creative practitioners and tool designers, I build a preliminary theory of how power relationships manifest in creativity support tools, and what tool designers can do, both technically and methodologically, to mitigate imbalances in power relationships.Taken together, it is my goal to show that supporting creative practices beyond accomplishing tasks with more efficiency or lower mental load--supporting wonderful creative practices that are unpredictable, emergent, and messy-means taking power relationships-and creative practitioners themselves-more seriously in software design.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Software development. $3 1472595
650 4 $a Power. $3 999190
650 4 $a Drawing. $3 811368
650 4 $a Pandemics. $3 1311394
650 4 $a Empowerment. $3 1437620
650 4 $a Software utilities. $3 1472596
650 4 $a Drownings. $3 1465909
650 4 $a Visual artists. $3 1472597
650 4 $a Art. $3 807354
650 4 $a Creativity. $3 1026898
650 4 $a COVID-19. $3 1335291
650 4 $a Computer science. $3 573171
650 4 $a Epidemiology. $3 635923
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0984
690 $a 0766
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Stanford University. $3 1184533
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-06B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30726911 $z click for full text (PQDT)