國立虎尾科技大學 |

Citation and Tradition : = Hannah Arendt's and Susan Sontag's Walter Benjamin Portraits.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Citation and Tradition :/
其他題名:	Hannah Arendt's and Susan Sontag's Walter Benjamin Portraits.
作者:	Mattner, Cosima.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (376 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-10, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-10A.
標題:	Womens studies. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798382200163

Citation and Tradition : = Hannah Arendt's and Susan Sontag's Walter Benjamin Portraits.
Mattner, Cosima.

Citation and Tradition :Hannah Arendt's and Susan Sontag's Walter Benjamin Portraits. - 1 online resource (376 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-10, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2024.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation explores the relationship of two of the most prominent women intellectuals of the twentieth century, Hannah Arendt and Susan Sontag. While they are not commonly considered to be related figures - Arendt is mainly recognized as a political thinker, Sontag is an icon of postwar popular culture - it has been anecdotally noted that they lived and worked in the same intellectual environment in postwar New York City, where their paths crossed a few times. However, a comprehensive systematic study of their relationship is missing. Starting from their Benjamin portraits of 1968 and 1978, I argue that Arendt's and Sontag's relationship is significant in terms of the German and US American tradition of literary criticism: Both women acted as transatlantic critics invested in cultural transfer between postwar US and Germany, and they employed similar styles of citation and editorial strategies to create and inscribe themselves into an authoritative literary tradition. With Arendt and Sontag, I discuss the critic's task in terms of citational style and as a matter of taking care of literary traditions beyond national borders.As I demonstrate through comprehensive, in-depth archival analysis and close readings, Arendt and Sontag intervened with their Benjamin portraits in a heated debate about critical methods surrounding the editorial management of Benjamin's estate and legacy through Theodor W. Adorno and Gershom Scholem in late 1960s Germany. Arendt's portrait made Benjamin's work available to an English-speaking audience for the first time and Sontag popularized his prominence in the US even further. Both stage Benjamin as a literary figure rather than a philosopher. Stylistically, they employ related strategies of citational mimicry to create an intimate connection between their voices and Benjamin's, granting even unfamiliar readers access to Benjamin's complex writing. Through constant dialogue with his work, their affective and affirmative mediation has significant editorial qualities. By preserving and promoting Benjamin as a critic in the US, Arendt and Sontag created a transatlantic tradition of literary criticism in which they inscribed themselves to gain critical authority in singular yet similar ways.Tracing the relationship between the portraits archivally, I argue that their similar citational creation of discursive authority results from Sontag's comprehensive study of Arendt's work and is thus an example of critical skill building through stylistic imitation. Rendering the hidden citational traces between the portraits transparent, I show how this line of influence ironically yields a lack of credit to Arendt on Sontag's part. Like Arendt, Sontag reifies rather than breaks patriarchal citational chains. Illuminating what Arendt calls a "hidden tradition" - consisting in stylistically visible yet inexplicit commonalities - I draw on terminology gained from the current debate on critical method in Western literary studies to argue that the portraits afford a concept of criticism between such polemic poles as "surface" versus "depth" reading, "description" versus "interpretation" or "affirmation" versus "suspicion." Characterizing this critical nuance with Arendt and Sontag as related critics, my study delineates a genealogy of a transatlantic mode of close reading with hermeneutic roots and a feminist twist.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798382200163Subjects--Topical Terms:

1372829
Womens studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

CitationIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Citation and Tradition : = Hannah Arendt's and Susan Sontag's Walter Benjamin Portraits.
LDR:04802ntm a22004217 4500 001 1147028
005 20240819061935.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2024 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798382200163
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30992993
035 $a AAI30992993
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Mattner, Cosima. $3 1472626
245 1 0 $a Citation and Tradition : $b Hannah Arendt's and Susan Sontag's Walter Benjamin Portraits.
264 0 $c 2024
300 $a 1 online resource (376 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-10, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Breger, Claudia C.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2024.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation explores the relationship of two of the most prominent women intellectuals of the twentieth century, Hannah Arendt and Susan Sontag. While they are not commonly considered to be related figures - Arendt is mainly recognized as a political thinker, Sontag is an icon of postwar popular culture - it has been anecdotally noted that they lived and worked in the same intellectual environment in postwar New York City, where their paths crossed a few times. However, a comprehensive systematic study of their relationship is missing. Starting from their Benjamin portraits of 1968 and 1978, I argue that Arendt's and Sontag's relationship is significant in terms of the German and US American tradition of literary criticism: Both women acted as transatlantic critics invested in cultural transfer between postwar US and Germany, and they employed similar styles of citation and editorial strategies to create and inscribe themselves into an authoritative literary tradition. With Arendt and Sontag, I discuss the critic's task in terms of citational style and as a matter of taking care of literary traditions beyond national borders.As I demonstrate through comprehensive, in-depth archival analysis and close readings, Arendt and Sontag intervened with their Benjamin portraits in a heated debate about critical methods surrounding the editorial management of Benjamin's estate and legacy through Theodor W. Adorno and Gershom Scholem in late 1960s Germany. Arendt's portrait made Benjamin's work available to an English-speaking audience for the first time and Sontag popularized his prominence in the US even further. Both stage Benjamin as a literary figure rather than a philosopher. Stylistically, they employ related strategies of citational mimicry to create an intimate connection between their voices and Benjamin's, granting even unfamiliar readers access to Benjamin's complex writing. Through constant dialogue with his work, their affective and affirmative mediation has significant editorial qualities. By preserving and promoting Benjamin as a critic in the US, Arendt and Sontag created a transatlantic tradition of literary criticism in which they inscribed themselves to gain critical authority in singular yet similar ways.Tracing the relationship between the portraits archivally, I argue that their similar citational creation of discursive authority results from Sontag's comprehensive study of Arendt's work and is thus an example of critical skill building through stylistic imitation. Rendering the hidden citational traces between the portraits transparent, I show how this line of influence ironically yields a lack of credit to Arendt on Sontag's part. Like Arendt, Sontag reifies rather than breaks patriarchal citational chains. Illuminating what Arendt calls a "hidden tradition" - consisting in stylistically visible yet inexplicit commonalities - I draw on terminology gained from the current debate on critical method in Western literary studies to argue that the portraits afford a concept of criticism between such polemic poles as "surface" versus "depth" reading, "description" versus "interpretation" or "affirmation" versus "suspicion." Characterizing this critical nuance with Arendt and Sontag as related critics, my study delineates a genealogy of a transatlantic mode of close reading with hermeneutic roots and a feminist twist.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Womens studies. $3 1372829
650 4 $a American literature. $3 685398
650 4 $a Literature. $3 557269
650 4 $a German literature. $3 685498
653 $a Citation
653 $a Criticism
653 $a Arendt, Hannah
653 $a Sontag, Susan
653 $a Tradition
653 $a Benjamin, Walter
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0311
690 $a 0401
690 $a 0591
690 $a 0453
710 2 $a Columbia University. $b Germanic Languages. $3 1472627
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-10A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30992993 $z click for full text (PQDT)