國立虎尾科技大學 |

Just like me but not Exactly : = AI, Anthropomorphism & the Human-Technology gap.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Just like me but not Exactly :/
其他題名:	AI, Anthropomorphism & the Human-Technology gap.
作者:	Ionescu, Iulia A.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (273 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-06A.
標題:	Web studies. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798381031232

Just like me but not Exactly : = AI, Anthropomorphism & the Human-Technology gap.
Ionescu, Iulia A.

Just like me but not Exactly :AI, Anthropomorphism & the Human-Technology gap. - 1 online resource (273 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Royal College of Art (United Kingdom), 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

While artificial intelligence (AI) design continues to aspire towards romanticised visions of intelligence and human-likeness, the increasing dichotomy between its technological and social facets has given rise to tangible evidence of surveillance, inequality and discrimination. This evidence emphasises a pressing need for systems more aligned with human expectations and values, but computationally, it remains extremely difficult to embed concepts as fundamentally fluid and situational as value and meaning. Such difficulty has led present-day research to formalise these intricate principles of human behaviour, in all their complexity, through predictive machine learning models built on data extracted from how people behave not in relationship to AI but in the absence of it.Human entails, foremost, an understanding of the interaction between concept (humanlike design) and percept (anthropomorphism). Consequently, the effect of these variables on each other is explored in two stages: first by reviewing whether our mental models of humanlike AI are built on pre-existing knowledge and schemas of other people (Just Like Me), and second, by probing their homogeneity with respect to their corresponding human counterparts (But Not Exactly). Building on the results of these initial investigations, this study demonstrates that the locus of the interaction, in practice, cannot be neatly extracted from manipulating the correlation of these variables, but rather by looking at how it is continuously constituted in the dynamic between the two. With combinations of effects born in the fleeting concept-perception interaction, it is concluded that very few behavioural patterns and mental models can truly be universalised, and for the most part, one context cannot be neatly applied to the next.To address this epistemological limitation, the present study proposes a novel methodological approach - taking influence from cognitive dissonance theory - that requires the designer/researcher to locate themselves in the complexity of this socio-technical world and to reflect on how their interventions impact that which they are observing. In addition to providing a visual method of investigating the interaction, the proposed approach is ultimately intended as a design strategy for addressing the nonlinear and often chaotic dynamics of an emergent field of study: the Human-AI.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798381031232Subjects--Topical Terms:

1148502
Web studies.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Just like me but not Exactly : = AI, Anthropomorphism & the Human-Technology gap.
LDR:03697ntm a22003617 4500 001 1147323
005 20240909100757.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798381031232
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30751051
035 $a (MiAaPQ)RoyalCollegeArt5530
035 $a AAI30751051
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Ionescu, Iulia A. $3 1473025
245 1 0 $a Just like me but not Exactly : $b AI, Anthropomorphism & the Human-Technology gap.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (273 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Hall, Ashley;Banks, Richard.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Royal College of Art (United Kingdom), 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a While artificial intelligence (AI) design continues to aspire towards romanticised visions of intelligence and human-likeness, the increasing dichotomy between its technological and social facets has given rise to tangible evidence of surveillance, inequality and discrimination. This evidence emphasises a pressing need for systems more aligned with human expectations and values, but computationally, it remains extremely difficult to embed concepts as fundamentally fluid and situational as value and meaning. Such difficulty has led present-day research to formalise these intricate principles of human behaviour, in all their complexity, through predictive machine learning models built on data extracted from how people behave not in relationship to AI but in the absence of it.Human entails, foremost, an understanding of the interaction between concept (humanlike design) and percept (anthropomorphism). Consequently, the effect of these variables on each other is explored in two stages: first by reviewing whether our mental models of humanlike AI are built on pre-existing knowledge and schemas of other people (Just Like Me), and second, by probing their homogeneity with respect to their corresponding human counterparts (But Not Exactly). Building on the results of these initial investigations, this study demonstrates that the locus of the interaction, in practice, cannot be neatly extracted from manipulating the correlation of these variables, but rather by looking at how it is continuously constituted in the dynamic between the two. With combinations of effects born in the fleeting concept-perception interaction, it is concluded that very few behavioural patterns and mental models can truly be universalised, and for the most part, one context cannot be neatly applied to the next.To address this epistemological limitation, the present study proposes a novel methodological approach - taking influence from cognitive dissonance theory - that requires the designer/researcher to locate themselves in the complexity of this socio-technical world and to reflect on how their interventions impact that which they are observing. In addition to providing a visual method of investigating the interaction, the proposed approach is ultimately intended as a design strategy for addressing the nonlinear and often chaotic dynamics of an emergent field of study: the Human-AI.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Web studies. $3 1148502
650 4 $a Information technology. $3 559429
650 4 $a Computer science. $3 573171
650 4 $a Decision making. $3 528319
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0800
690 $a 0984
690 $a 0489
690 $a 0646
710 2 $a Royal College of Art (United Kingdom). $3 1335395
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-06A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30751051 $z click for full text (PQDT)