國立虎尾科技大學 |

Heterogeneity in the Neural Mechanisms of Adversity : = Implications for Developmental Risk and Resilience.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Heterogeneity in the Neural Mechanisms of Adversity :/
其他題名:	Implications for Developmental Risk and Resilience.
作者:	Hardi, Felicia A.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (226 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-12B.
標題:	Neurosciences. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798382739717

Heterogeneity in the Neural Mechanisms of Adversity : = Implications for Developmental Risk and Resilience.
Hardi, Felicia A.

Heterogeneity in the Neural Mechanisms of Adversity :Implications for Developmental Risk and Resilience. - 1 online resource (226 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2024.

Includes bibliographical references

The wide heterogeneity in adverse outcomes of stressful experiences unexplained in existing literature suggests that more research is needed to understand the developmental risk and resilience to adversity. Specifically, why and how do certain experiences lead to mental health problems for some but not others? What neural mechanisms could account for the long-term effects of adverse experiences on mental health? This dissertation addressed these questions using prospective longitudinal data from a population-based birth cohort sample. The findings demonstrate that the developmental impact of adversity is specific to the types of experiences and neural features, thus requiring approaches that can capture the complexities of both the environment and the brain. Study one examined the differential neural mechanisms implicated in the long-term neural and behavioral consequences of childhood adversity across 21 years. Results show that household instability during childhood was associated with structural brain network organization in adolescence, even after accounting for other types of adversities. Moreover, structural network organization indirectly explained the association between childhood instability and depressive symptoms in young adulthood, demonstrating the prolonged influence of the early environment on mental health through experience-specific neural correlates. In study two, data-driven person-specific functional connectivity subgroups in adolescence were identified to predict mental health outcomes and stress susceptibility six years later, during the highly stressful period of the global pandemic. Findings revealed that individuals with greater functional connectivity involving specific emotion-related key regions (amygdala, subgenual cingulate cortex, ventral striatum) showed an increased trajectory of anxiety symptoms and were more susceptible to future stress, relative to those with connectivity involving other brain regions (dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, insula). These findings suggest that the associations between adverse experiences and mental health differ based on specific emotion-linked neural regions. Finally, study three built upon the previous studies by addressing heterogeneity in childhood adversity as well as adolescent brain networks using person-oriented approaches. First, data-driven latent profiles were identified using adverse experiences across multiple contexts during the first nine years of life. These profiles were then used to estimate differences in prospective youth mental health outcomes and person-specific functional brain networks. Findings demonstrate that youth with a profile indicated by high exposure to multi-domain adversity, as well as those with an adversity profile characterized by exposure to high maternal depression, exhibited the highest levels of internalizing and externalizing symptoms in adolescence. These patterns were also reflected in the brain function of these youth during emotion processing; specifically, youth with the high-adversity and maternal depression profiles showed the highest density within the default mode network. Additionally, those with the high childhood adversity profile showed attenuated salience network density and greater frontoparietal network density, suggesting aberrant network communication in key emotion regulatory regions. Collectively, this dissertation provides empirical evidence that the neural mechanisms of adversity are specific to the types of experiences, the brain regions involved, and their contextual interactions, which underscore the importance of considering development as an individualized process to parse heterogeneity in the influence of adversity. This work informs future studies by integrating broader environmental measures in characterizing adversity and adopting novel approaches in modeling brain development across multiple levels of analysis.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798382739717Subjects--Topical Terms:

593561
Neurosciences.
Subjects--Index Terms:

AdversityIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Heterogeneity in the Neural Mechanisms of Adversity : = Implications for Developmental Risk and Resilience.
LDR:05385ntm a22004217 4500 001 1148070
005 20240916070017.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2024 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798382739717
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31349022
035 $a (MiAaPQ)umichrackham005411
035 $a AAI31349022
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Hardi, Felicia A. $3 1473954
245 1 0 $a Heterogeneity in the Neural Mechanisms of Adversity : $b Implications for Developmental Risk and Resilience.
264 0 $c 2024
300 $a 1 online resource (226 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Monk, Christopher S.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2024.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The wide heterogeneity in adverse outcomes of stressful experiences unexplained in existing literature suggests that more research is needed to understand the developmental risk and resilience to adversity. Specifically, why and how do certain experiences lead to mental health problems for some but not others? What neural mechanisms could account for the long-term effects of adverse experiences on mental health? This dissertation addressed these questions using prospective longitudinal data from a population-based birth cohort sample. The findings demonstrate that the developmental impact of adversity is specific to the types of experiences and neural features, thus requiring approaches that can capture the complexities of both the environment and the brain. Study one examined the differential neural mechanisms implicated in the long-term neural and behavioral consequences of childhood adversity across 21 years. Results show that household instability during childhood was associated with structural brain network organization in adolescence, even after accounting for other types of adversities. Moreover, structural network organization indirectly explained the association between childhood instability and depressive symptoms in young adulthood, demonstrating the prolonged influence of the early environment on mental health through experience-specific neural correlates. In study two, data-driven person-specific functional connectivity subgroups in adolescence were identified to predict mental health outcomes and stress susceptibility six years later, during the highly stressful period of the global pandemic. Findings revealed that individuals with greater functional connectivity involving specific emotion-related key regions (amygdala, subgenual cingulate cortex, ventral striatum) showed an increased trajectory of anxiety symptoms and were more susceptible to future stress, relative to those with connectivity involving other brain regions (dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, insula). These findings suggest that the associations between adverse experiences and mental health differ based on specific emotion-linked neural regions. Finally, study three built upon the previous studies by addressing heterogeneity in childhood adversity as well as adolescent brain networks using person-oriented approaches. First, data-driven latent profiles were identified using adverse experiences across multiple contexts during the first nine years of life. These profiles were then used to estimate differences in prospective youth mental health outcomes and person-specific functional brain networks. Findings demonstrate that youth with a profile indicated by high exposure to multi-domain adversity, as well as those with an adversity profile characterized by exposure to high maternal depression, exhibited the highest levels of internalizing and externalizing symptoms in adolescence. These patterns were also reflected in the brain function of these youth during emotion processing; specifically, youth with the high-adversity and maternal depression profiles showed the highest density within the default mode network. Additionally, those with the high childhood adversity profile showed attenuated salience network density and greater frontoparietal network density, suggesting aberrant network communication in key emotion regulatory regions. Collectively, this dissertation provides empirical evidence that the neural mechanisms of adversity are specific to the types of experiences, the brain regions involved, and their contextual interactions, which underscore the importance of considering development as an individualized process to parse heterogeneity in the influence of adversity. This work informs future studies by integrating broader environmental measures in characterizing adversity and adopting novel approaches in modeling brain development across multiple levels of analysis.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Neurosciences. $3 593561
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 555998
650 4 $a Developmental psychology. $3 557458
650 4 $a Mental health. $3 564038
653 $a Adversity
653 $a Brain development
653 $a Heterogeneity
653 $a Brain networks
653 $a Youth mental health
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0317
690 $a 0620
690 $a 0347
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Michigan. $b Psychology. $3 1184063
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-12B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31349022 $z click for full text (PQDT)