國立虎尾科技大學 |

Modifiable Risk Factors for Dementia by Frailty : = Application of Population Intervention Effects.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Modifiable Risk Factors for Dementia by Frailty :/
Reminder of title:	Application of Population Intervention Effects.
Author:	Gao, Lingyuan.
Description:	1 online resource (42 pages)
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International85-11.
Subject:	Public health. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798382745435

Modifiable Risk Factors for Dementia by Frailty : = Application of Population Intervention Effects.
Gao, Lingyuan.

Modifiable Risk Factors for Dementia by Frailty :Application of Population Intervention Effects. - 1 online resource (42 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11.

Thesis (M.S.)--Duke University, 2024.

Includes bibliographical references

BackgroundSeveral modifiable risk factors for dementia have been identified. Rising interests focus on how frailty captures heterogeneous treatment and prevention effects. This study aimed to examine the association between modifiable risk factors and all-cause dementia among middle-aged and older adults and compare population-level intervention effects across frailty status.MethodsParticipants from UK Biobank without dementia and with available data on frailty and modifiable risk factors at baseline were included. Dementia was ascertained from inpatient records. Frailty was defined by a modified version of physical frailty phenotype and classified as non-frail, prefrail and frail. Thirteen socioeconomic, life-style, environmental, and medical risk factors were included. We used Logistic regression to examine their association with 10-year dementia. Population intervention effects were also estimated by parametric G-computation.ResultsOf 381, 419 eligible participants with a mean age of 56.9 years, 58.4%, 38.2%, and 3.4% were non-frail, pre-frail, and frail, respectively. Over a 10-year follow-up, 1,688 (0.76%), 1,949 (1.34%), and 378 (2.90%) dementia cases were identified among non-frail, pre-frail, and frail adults. The odds ratios for low education, physical inactivity, central obesity, hearing impairment, high NO2 exposure, and traumatic brain injury increased with higher frailty levels, but those for smoking, depression, hypertension, and diabetes decreased. Population intervention effects for single risk factors (excluding smoking and excessive alcohol use) increased with severer frailty status. For interventions achieving 100% coverage, the population intervention effect was 0.002, 0.007, and 0.022 in the non-frail, pre-frail, and frail populations, respectively. Even with intervention coverage of only 25% and 50%, the population intervention effect remained highest among the frail population.ConclusionWe found that frailty modifies the associations between established risk factors and dementia among middle-aged and older adults. Dementia intervention effectiveness appears to be greatest among frail adults. Therefore, routine frailty evaluation should be adopted to identify those who will gain the most from personalized dementia prevention strategies.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798382745435Subjects--Topical Terms:

560998
Public health.
Subjects--Index Terms:

DementiaIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Modifiable Risk Factors for Dementia by Frailty : = Application of Population Intervention Effects.
LDR:03606ntm a22003857 4500 001 1148359
005 20240924101904.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2024 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798382745435
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30997553
035 $a AAI30997553
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Gao, Lingyuan. $3 1474306
245 1 0 $a Modifiable Risk Factors for Dementia by Frailty : $b Application of Population Intervention Effects.
264 0 $c 2024
300 $a 1 online resource (42 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11.
500 $a Advisor: Wu, Chenkai.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Duke University, 2024.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a BackgroundSeveral modifiable risk factors for dementia have been identified. Rising interests focus on how frailty captures heterogeneous treatment and prevention effects. This study aimed to examine the association between modifiable risk factors and all-cause dementia among middle-aged and older adults and compare population-level intervention effects across frailty status.MethodsParticipants from UK Biobank without dementia and with available data on frailty and modifiable risk factors at baseline were included. Dementia was ascertained from inpatient records. Frailty was defined by a modified version of physical frailty phenotype and classified as non-frail, prefrail and frail. Thirteen socioeconomic, life-style, environmental, and medical risk factors were included. We used Logistic regression to examine their association with 10-year dementia. Population intervention effects were also estimated by parametric G-computation.ResultsOf 381, 419 eligible participants with a mean age of 56.9 years, 58.4%, 38.2%, and 3.4% were non-frail, pre-frail, and frail, respectively. Over a 10-year follow-up, 1,688 (0.76%), 1,949 (1.34%), and 378 (2.90%) dementia cases were identified among non-frail, pre-frail, and frail adults. The odds ratios for low education, physical inactivity, central obesity, hearing impairment, high NO2 exposure, and traumatic brain injury increased with higher frailty levels, but those for smoking, depression, hypertension, and diabetes decreased. Population intervention effects for single risk factors (excluding smoking and excessive alcohol use) increased with severer frailty status. For interventions achieving 100% coverage, the population intervention effect was 0.002, 0.007, and 0.022 in the non-frail, pre-frail, and frail populations, respectively. Even with intervention coverage of only 25% and 50%, the population intervention effect remained highest among the frail population.ConclusionWe found that frailty modifies the associations between established risk factors and dementia among middle-aged and older adults. Dementia intervention effectiveness appears to be greatest among frail adults. Therefore, routine frailty evaluation should be adopted to identify those who will gain the most from personalized dementia prevention strategies.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Public health. $3 560998
650 4 $a Epidemiology. $3 635923
650 4 $a Aging. $3 559847
653 $a Dementia
653 $a Frailty
653 $a Biobank
653 $a Heterogeneous treatment
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0573
690 $a 0766
690 $a 0493
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Duke University. $b Global Health. $3 1183064
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 85-11.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30997553 $z click for full text (PQDT)