語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Calculating the Standardized Precipitation Index Using a Moving Window Approach.
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Calculating the Standardized Precipitation Index Using a Moving Window Approach./
作者:
Satterlee, Leonard.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (49 pages)
附註:
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-04.
Contained By:
Masters Abstracts International81-04.
標題:
Climate change. -
電子資源:
click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9781088349182
Calculating the Standardized Precipitation Index Using a Moving Window Approach.
Satterlee, Leonard.
Calculating the Standardized Precipitation Index Using a Moving Window Approach.
- 1 online resource (49 pages)
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-04.
Thesis (M.S.)--Indiana University, 2019.
Includes bibliographical references
Improved understanding of the timing and duration of droughts and pluvials increases our ability to adapt while minimizing the financial cost of these natural disasters. Here, using daily precipitation data from across the United States, we develop a method that reformulates the traditional Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) to use a moving-window approach. This reformulation allows for fine temporal-scale monitoring of drought and pluvial conditions, with the drought index updated daily. Using moving-window SPI, drought and pluvial periods reach greater extremes than indicated by monthly SPI. Most stations did not have higher SPI variance with moving-window SPI compared to monthly SPI. The few that did were mainly with short calculation periods (i.e., for 1-month SPI) as opposed to long calculation periods (i.e., for 3-or 6- month SPI), where essentially no stations experienced higher variance. In nearly all cases, moving-window SPI resulted in a greater number of drought and pluvial events being detected.For most stations, 90- and 180-day approaches made these events up to twice as frequent, whereas the 30-day approach made them mainly 1.5x to 4x more frequent, depending on the severity threshold being used. Moving-window SPI also produced drought and pluvial durations that were longer than with monthly SPI, as much as 50 days longer in some cases. Overall, the differences between moving-window and monthly SPI tend to be larger for shorter monitoring periods.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9781088349182Subjects--Topical Terms:
1009004
Climate change.
Subjects--Index Terms:
DroughtIndex Terms--Genre/Form:
554714
Electronic books.
Calculating the Standardized Precipitation Index Using a Moving Window Approach.
LDR
:02739ntm a22003737 4500
001
1148446
005
20240924101514.5
006
m o d
007
cr bn ---uuuuu
008
250605s2019 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9781088349182
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI22585467
035
$a
AAI22585467
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
$d
NTU
100
1
$a
Satterlee, Leonard.
$3
1474407
245
1 0
$a
Calculating the Standardized Precipitation Index Using a Moving Window Approach.
264
0
$c
2019
300
$a
1 online resource (49 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-04.
500
$a
Advisor: Robeson, Scott.
502
$a
Thesis (M.S.)--Indiana University, 2019.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
Improved understanding of the timing and duration of droughts and pluvials increases our ability to adapt while minimizing the financial cost of these natural disasters. Here, using daily precipitation data from across the United States, we develop a method that reformulates the traditional Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) to use a moving-window approach. This reformulation allows for fine temporal-scale monitoring of drought and pluvial conditions, with the drought index updated daily. Using moving-window SPI, drought and pluvial periods reach greater extremes than indicated by monthly SPI. Most stations did not have higher SPI variance with moving-window SPI compared to monthly SPI. The few that did were mainly with short calculation periods (i.e., for 1-month SPI) as opposed to long calculation periods (i.e., for 3-or 6- month SPI), where essentially no stations experienced higher variance. In nearly all cases, moving-window SPI resulted in a greater number of drought and pluvial events being detected.For most stations, 90- and 180-day approaches made these events up to twice as frequent, whereas the 30-day approach made them mainly 1.5x to 4x more frequent, depending on the severity threshold being used. Moving-window SPI also produced drought and pluvial durations that were longer than with monthly SPI, as much as 50 days longer in some cases. Overall, the differences between moving-window and monthly SPI tend to be larger for shorter monitoring periods.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2024
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Climate change.
$2
bicssc
$3
1009004
650
4
$a
Atmospheric sciences.
$3
1179392
650
4
$a
Water resources management.
$3
1178858
653
$a
Drought
653
$a
Pluvial
653
$a
SPI
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
554714
690
$a
0404
690
$a
0725
690
$a
0595
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
1178819
710
2
$a
Indiana University.
$b
Geography.
$3
1185692
773
0
$t
Masters Abstracts International
$g
81-04.
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=22585467
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入