國立虎尾科技大學 |

Essays in corporate finance.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Essays in corporate finance./
作者:	Svetina, Marko.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (90 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 70-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International70-03A.
標題:	Fees & charges. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780549595977

Essays in corporate finance.
Svetina, Marko.

Essays in corporate finance. - 1 online resource (90 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 70-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2008.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation investigates two questions in empirical corporate finance. The first essay studies the universe of exchange traded funds (ETFs) from their inception to the end of 2007 and their impact on passive investment management industry. ETFs that track an index, for which there are no pre-existing IMFs, expand investors' investment opportunity set but underperform their benchmarks. ETFs that compete directly with retail (institutional) IMFs deliver better (equivalent) net of fees returns. The effects of competition are apparent; ETF introduction reduces flows to incumbent IMFs and ETFs. The second essay examines the differences in gains to public targets in acquisitions made by private equity and public bidders. If the acquirer is a public firm, premiums (CARs) to target shareholders are 18% (55%) larger than if the acquirer is a private equity firm. These gains are robust to controlling for differences in synergistic gains, target and deal characteristics, the form of payment, and the completion status. In addition, this essay examines contested bids where public and private equity firms bid for the same target, and finds that if the winner is a public firm, target premiums (CARs) are 32% (100%) larger than if the acquirer is a private equity firm. Public acquirers which management owns a large (small) part of their own firm pay less (more) for their targets, a finding consistent with the agency problem hypothesis. Private equity acquirers' post-acquisition performance, on the other hand, is consistent with the synergistic motives hypothesis. The observed difference in premiums is likely due to the combination of these two hypotheses, between which this essay is unable to differentiate.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780549595977Subjects--Topical Terms:

1468765
Fees & charges.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Corporate financeIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Essays in corporate finance.
LDR:02979ntm a22003617 4500 001 1149129
005 20240930130049.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2008 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780549595977
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3311757
035 $a AAI3311757
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Svetina, Marko. $3 1475276
245 1 0 $a Essays in corporate finance.
264 0 $c 2008
300 $a 1 online resource (90 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 70-03, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2008.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation investigates two questions in empirical corporate finance. The first essay studies the universe of exchange traded funds (ETFs) from their inception to the end of 2007 and their impact on passive investment management industry. ETFs that track an index, for which there are no pre-existing IMFs, expand investors' investment opportunity set but underperform their benchmarks. ETFs that compete directly with retail (institutional) IMFs deliver better (equivalent) net of fees returns. The effects of competition are apparent; ETF introduction reduces flows to incumbent IMFs and ETFs. The second essay examines the differences in gains to public targets in acquisitions made by private equity and public bidders. If the acquirer is a public firm, premiums (CARs) to target shareholders are 18% (55%) larger than if the acquirer is a private equity firm. These gains are robust to controlling for differences in synergistic gains, target and deal characteristics, the form of payment, and the completion status. In addition, this essay examines contested bids where public and private equity firms bid for the same target, and finds that if the winner is a public firm, target premiums (CARs) are 32% (100%) larger than if the acquirer is a private equity firm. Public acquirers which management owns a large (small) part of their own firm pay less (more) for their targets, a finding consistent with the agency problem hypothesis. Private equity acquirers' post-acquisition performance, on the other hand, is consistent with the synergistic motives hypothesis. The observed difference in premiums is likely due to the combination of these two hypotheses, between which this essay is unable to differentiate.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Fees & charges. $3 1468765
650 4 $a Securities lending. $3 1417227
650 4 $a Finance. $3 559073
650 4 $a Proprietary. $3 1475278
650 4 $a Innovations. $3 578404
650 4 $a Competition. $3 559988
650 4 $a Time series. $3 1413638
650 4 $a Growth rate. $3 1465288
650 4 $a Prices. $3 580802
650 4 $a Lifecycle funds. $3 1475277
650 4 $a Investigations. $3 1372519
650 4 $a Studies. $3 1437762
653 $a Corporate finance
653 $a Exchange-traded funds
653 $a Private equity
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0508
690 $a 0511
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $3 1189497
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 70-03A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3311757 $z click for full text (PQDT)