國立虎尾科技大學 |

Understanding Political Rigidity : = Exploring the Epistemic Underpinnings of Political Ideology.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Understanding Political Rigidity :/
其他題名:	Exploring the Epistemic Underpinnings of Political Ideology.
作者:	Osteen, Chad M.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (241 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-12A.
標題:	Social psychology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798382910789

Understanding Political Rigidity : = Exploring the Epistemic Underpinnings of Political Ideology.
Osteen, Chad M.

Understanding Political Rigidity :Exploring the Epistemic Underpinnings of Political Ideology. - 1 online resource (241 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Loyola University Chicago, 2024.

Includes bibliographical references

The ideology as motivated social cognition model conceptualizes conservatism in terms of two unique constructs: political conservatism and psychological conservatism. The former pertains to a predisposition to specific ideological beliefs (e.g., resistance to change), while the latter pertains to the psychological traits that are associated with particular ideologies (e.g., negativity bias). Experimental research demonstrates the mechanistic relationship of epistemic motivations and emergent political behavior. Much of the evidence lies in explicitly ideological outcomes. The current proposal seeks to test the fundamental assumption in this body of work. This is the assumption that increased epistemic motivation should lead to a preference for simple and decisive over more complex and ambiguous stimuli in order to satiate threats and uncertainty. Specifically, I sought to explore this by situationally manipulating threat (Study 1) and uncertainty (Study 2) and measuring participants' level of epistemic motivations and preferences for simple and decisive candidates even when there was no overt political information present. The results of this work largely support the claim that participants with high epistemic motivations prefer candidates with characteristics that satiate their needs for certainty, order, structure, and closure. Tentative findings suggest different epistemic motivations may have varying importance depending on dispositional versus situational influences. Furthermore, uncertainty may be more tied to existential rather than epistemic motivations. Future work should continue to explore the influence of social cognitive motivators and political judgements.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798382910789Subjects--Topical Terms:

554804
Social psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

IdeologyIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Understanding Political Rigidity : = Exploring the Epistemic Underpinnings of Political Ideology.
LDR:03024ntm a22003737 4500 001 1149805
005 20241022110517.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2024 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798382910789
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30689104
035 $a AAI30689104
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Osteen, Chad M. $3 1476155
245 1 0 $a Understanding Political Rigidity : $b Exploring the Epistemic Underpinnings of Political Ideology.
264 0 $c 2024
300 $a 1 online resource (241 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Ottati, Victor.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Loyola University Chicago, 2024.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The ideology as motivated social cognition model conceptualizes conservatism in terms of two unique constructs: political conservatism and psychological conservatism. The former pertains to a predisposition to specific ideological beliefs (e.g., resistance to change), while the latter pertains to the psychological traits that are associated with particular ideologies (e.g., negativity bias). Experimental research demonstrates the mechanistic relationship of epistemic motivations and emergent political behavior. Much of the evidence lies in explicitly ideological outcomes. The current proposal seeks to test the fundamental assumption in this body of work. This is the assumption that increased epistemic motivation should lead to a preference for simple and decisive over more complex and ambiguous stimuli in order to satiate threats and uncertainty. Specifically, I sought to explore this by situationally manipulating threat (Study 1) and uncertainty (Study 2) and measuring participants' level of epistemic motivations and preferences for simple and decisive candidates even when there was no overt political information present. The results of this work largely support the claim that participants with high epistemic motivations prefer candidates with characteristics that satiate their needs for certainty, order, structure, and closure. Tentative findings suggest different epistemic motivations may have varying importance depending on dispositional versus situational influences. Furthermore, uncertainty may be more tied to existential rather than epistemic motivations. Future work should continue to explore the influence of social cognitive motivators and political judgements.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 554804
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 555998
650 4 $a Political science. $3 558774
653 $a Ideology
653 $a Political cognition
653 $a Social cognition
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Loyola University Chicago. $b Psychology. $3 1189286
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-12A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30689104 $z click for full text (PQDT)