國立虎尾科技大學 |

Of Ripple Effects and Reverberations : = Disinformation in a Two-Level Game.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Of Ripple Effects and Reverberations :/
其他題名:	Disinformation in a Two-Level Game.
作者:	Cantrell, Michal.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (427 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-10, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-10B.
標題:	Public policy. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798382238258

Of Ripple Effects and Reverberations : = Disinformation in a Two-Level Game.
Cantrell, Michal.

Of Ripple Effects and Reverberations :Disinformation in a Two-Level Game. - 1 online resource (427 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-10, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2024.

Includes bibliographical references

Why, how, and to what effect do states use disinformation in their foreign policies? Inductive accounts variously address those questions, but International Relations has yet to offer a theoretical account. I propose Putnam's two-level game (1988) as a candidate theory. A rationalist approach that jettisons the unitary actor assumption, the model accounts for previous accounts' observations and suggests their interrelation and four overarching objectives. The model also generates novel implications about disinformation in foreign policy, two of which I test via separate survey experiments.The primary implication is that states can use disinformation to encourage polarization and in turn can reverberate into commitment problems. A survey experiment tests the first link in that chain, arguing that disinformation's effects could be underestimated due to focus on belief outcomes; potential selection bias in active-exposure studies; and probable pre-treatment effects. It hypothesizes that passive exposure to novel political dis/misinformation has ripple effects on trust, affective polarization, and participation-linked emotions even among those that disbelieve it. It thus tests both the implication that disinformation can encourage polarization and that disinformation can be used to impact multiple potential outcomes at once.The second empirical paper tests the latter links in the disinformation-commitment problem chain. Building on a study that found U.S polarization decreases U.K. ally confidence (Myrick 2022), it argues that polarization uniquely increases chances of voluntary defection and does so not only due to government changeover risk but also weakened leader accountability. It employs a causal mediation analysis on survey experiment data to test whether a potential partner's polarization increases their perceived unreliability and in turn decreases public cooperation preference.The commitment problem implication receives mixed support. The first experiment evidences no impact of partisan mis/disinformation on affective polarization, though that may be due to floor effects. The second experiment finds that polarization modestly increases perceived defection risk, but this increase is not necessarily strong enough to change public cooperation preference. Beyond those findings, the first experiment also uncovers that polarization may indeed have sociopolitical impacts on even those that disbelieve it, consistent with the multiple-outcomes implication.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798382238258Subjects--Topical Terms:

1002398
Public policy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Commitment problemIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Of Ripple Effects and Reverberations : = Disinformation in a Two-Level Game.
LDR:03919ntm a22004217 4500 001 1149851
005 20241022110531.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2024 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798382238258
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31148026
035 $a AAI31148026
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Cantrell, Michal. $3 1476217
245 1 0 $a Of Ripple Effects and Reverberations : $b Disinformation in a Two-Level Game.
264 0 $c 2024
300 $a 1 online resource (427 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-10, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Peterson, Timothy;Neuner, Fabian.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2024.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Why, how, and to what effect do states use disinformation in their foreign policies? Inductive accounts variously address those questions, but International Relations has yet to offer a theoretical account. I propose Putnam's two-level game (1988) as a candidate theory. A rationalist approach that jettisons the unitary actor assumption, the model accounts for previous accounts' observations and suggests their interrelation and four overarching objectives. The model also generates novel implications about disinformation in foreign policy, two of which I test via separate survey experiments.The primary implication is that states can use disinformation to encourage polarization and in turn can reverberate into commitment problems. A survey experiment tests the first link in that chain, arguing that disinformation's effects could be underestimated due to focus on belief outcomes; potential selection bias in active-exposure studies; and probable pre-treatment effects. It hypothesizes that passive exposure to novel political dis/misinformation has ripple effects on trust, affective polarization, and participation-linked emotions even among those that disbelieve it. It thus tests both the implication that disinformation can encourage polarization and that disinformation can be used to impact multiple potential outcomes at once.The second empirical paper tests the latter links in the disinformation-commitment problem chain. Building on a study that found U.S polarization decreases U.K. ally confidence (Myrick 2022), it argues that polarization uniquely increases chances of voluntary defection and does so not only due to government changeover risk but also weakened leader accountability. It employs a causal mediation analysis on survey experiment data to test whether a potential partner's polarization increases their perceived unreliability and in turn decreases public cooperation preference.The commitment problem implication receives mixed support. The first experiment evidences no impact of partisan mis/disinformation on affective polarization, though that may be due to floor effects. The second experiment finds that polarization modestly increases perceived defection risk, but this increase is not necessarily strong enough to change public cooperation preference. Beyond those findings, the first experiment also uncovers that polarization may indeed have sociopolitical impacts on even those that disbelieve it, consistent with the multiple-outcomes implication.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 1002398
650 4 $a Statistics. $3 556824
650 4 $a Political science. $3 558774
653 $a Commitment problem
653 $a Disinformation
653 $a Emotions
653 $a Misinformation
653 $a Polarization
653 $a Trust
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0463
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b Political Science. $3 1189700
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-10B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31148026 $z click for full text (PQDT)