國立虎尾科技大學 |

Beyond Mechanism : = Rethinking Kant's Philosophy of Nature With the Critique of the Power of Judgment.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Beyond Mechanism :/
其他題名:	Rethinking Kant's Philosophy of Nature With the Critique of the Power of Judgment.
作者:	Gonzalez, Juan Carlos.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (298 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-01, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-01A.
標題:	Philosophy of science. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798383209677

Beyond Mechanism : = Rethinking Kant's Philosophy of Nature With the Critique of the Power of Judgment.
Gonzalez, Juan Carlos.

Beyond Mechanism :Rethinking Kant's Philosophy of Nature With the Critique of the Power of Judgment. - 1 online resource (298 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-01, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, San Diego, 2024.

Includes bibliographical references

My dissertation defends a non-mechanistic interpretation of Kant's philosophy of nature. Inspired by the picture of nature in the Critique of Pure Reason and Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, most readers align Kant with Early Modern mechanists, who claim that we can know that the internally purposive form of causality characteristic of organisms has no place in nature. To these mechanistic readers, Kant banishes internal purposiveness from nature. To moderate mechanistic interpreters, because we cannot know whether there are internally purposive things in nature and we can demonstrate that mechanism applies to nature, Kant pushes us to believe that any seemingly internally purposive natural products will eventually be explained in mechanistic terms. To strong mechanistic interpreters, Kant gives us the tools to know that there is no room for the special kind of teleology organisms exhibit in nature. My non-mechanistic interpretation rejects this trend by arguing that Kant urges us to believe that the internally purposive activity characteristic of organisms exists in nature. Belief in this context is a firm, positive, and voluntary attitude that aligns with and serves a subject's interests and ends, and that has implications for the subject's rational action, assertion, and deliberation. Kant's stated goal in the third Critique is to bridge the gulf between freedom and nature. My non-mechanistic interpretation offers a new account of how Kant promises to construct this bridge.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798383209677Subjects--Topical Terms:

1009373
Philosophy of science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Kant, ImmanuelIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Beyond Mechanism : = Rethinking Kant's Philosophy of Nature With the Critique of the Power of Judgment.
LDR:02929ntm a22004097 4500 001 1149857
005 20241022110533.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2024 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798383209677
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31236954
035 $a AAI31236954
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Gonzalez, Juan Carlos. $3 1476225
245 1 0 $a Beyond Mechanism : $b Rethinking Kant's Philosophy of Nature With the Critique of the Power of Judgment.
264 0 $c 2024
300 $a 1 online resource (298 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-01, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Tolley, Clinton.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, San Diego, 2024.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a My dissertation defends a non-mechanistic interpretation of Kant's philosophy of nature. Inspired by the picture of nature in the Critique of Pure Reason and Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, most readers align Kant with Early Modern mechanists, who claim that we can know that the internally purposive form of causality characteristic of organisms has no place in nature. To these mechanistic readers, Kant banishes internal purposiveness from nature. To moderate mechanistic interpreters, because we cannot know whether there are internally purposive things in nature and we can demonstrate that mechanism applies to nature, Kant pushes us to believe that any seemingly internally purposive natural products will eventually be explained in mechanistic terms. To strong mechanistic interpreters, Kant gives us the tools to know that there is no room for the special kind of teleology organisms exhibit in nature. My non-mechanistic interpretation rejects this trend by arguing that Kant urges us to believe that the internally purposive activity characteristic of organisms exists in nature. Belief in this context is a firm, positive, and voluntary attitude that aligns with and serves a subject's interests and ends, and that has implications for the subject's rational action, assertion, and deliberation. Kant's stated goal in the third Critique is to bridge the gulf between freedom and nature. My non-mechanistic interpretation offers a new account of how Kant promises to construct this bridge.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Philosophy of science. $2 bicssc $3 1009373
650 4 $a Metaphysics. $3 555859
650 4 $a Epistemology. $3 671538
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 559771
653 $a Kant, Immanuel
653 $a Mechanism
653 $a Organisms
653 $a Philosophy of nature
653 $a Teleology
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0402
690 $a 0393
690 $a 0396
710 2 $a University of California, San Diego. $b Philosophy. $3 1186737
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-01A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31236954 $z click for full text (PQDT)