國立虎尾科技大學 |

Diversity in Teams : = Differential Effects of Deep-Level Compositional Diversity Characteristics of a Team.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Diversity in Teams :/
其他題名:	Differential Effects of Deep-Level Compositional Diversity Characteristics of a Team.
作者:	Royes, Joshua J.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (189 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-04B.
標題:	Social psychology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798544205975

Diversity in Teams : = Differential Effects of Deep-Level Compositional Diversity Characteristics of a Team.
Royes, Joshua J.

Diversity in Teams :Differential Effects of Deep-Level Compositional Diversity Characteristics of a Team. - 1 online resource (189 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Tulsa, 2021.

Includes bibliographical references

The purpose of this dissertation is to examine the impact that actual and perceived diversity within a team can have on team effectiveness. The majority of diversity research has been conducted on surface-level diversity variables, but deep-level variables are more impactful on team effectiveness (Tu, Hong, Jiang, & Zhang, 2020). This research project used the compositional diversity framework developed by Harrison and Klein (2007) to operationalize individual difference variables as deep-level diversity variables. This framework splits diversity variables into one of three diversity types, with each type having predetermined linear relationships with team outcomes. In addition to diversity, team members also form perceptions of the diversity on the team, and although related, the diversity on a team and the diversity that is perceived on a team are distinct concepts (Shemla, Meyer, Greer, & Jehn, 2016). It was hypothesized that in addition to the diversity variables having their predetermined relationships with team effectivess outcomes, perceived diversity would be more related to subjective outcomes (i.e., team satisfaction and team viability) than actual diversity, while actual diversity would be more related to objective outcomes (i.e., team performance) than perceived diversity.This study collected data from a single timepoint survey sent to college or university students who were working on 3-8-person team projects within their courses. Hierarchical regression was used to examine if diversity variables could predict team effectiveness variables above and beyond team-level variables. Support was found for diversity predicting team effectiveness above and beyond tea-level variables. Inconsistent support was found for the hypotheses; however, the results do make contributions to the field in several regards. First, this study found that actual and perceived diversity are not interchangeable constructs, and in fact, the relationship that diversity and perceived diversity have with one another vary by the construct in question. Second, diversity variables are important determinants of team effectiveness as evidenced by the relationships that diversity had with the team effectiveness variables. Third, team members vary in their perceptions of diversity within their own team, and oftentimes could not reliably rate the perceptions of team-level diversity. And fourth, the Harrison and Klein (2007) framework is a meaningful way to organize diversity variables. In fact, this study exhibited stronger relationships between diversity and outcomes as a previous meta-analysis (i.e., Bell, Villado, Lukasik, Belau, & Briggs, 2011) that used primarily surface-level variables, perhaps suggesting that the Harrison and Klein (2007) framework is well-suited to deep-level diversity variables.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798544205975Subjects--Topical Terms:

554804
Social psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Deep-level diversityIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Diversity in Teams : = Differential Effects of Deep-Level Compositional Diversity Characteristics of a Team.
LDR:04207ntm a22003857 4500 001 1149950
005 20241023120608.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2021 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798544205975
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28498344
035 $a AAI28498344
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Royes, Joshua J. $3 1476333
245 1 0 $a Diversity in Teams : $b Differential Effects of Deep-Level Compositional Diversity Characteristics of a Team.
264 0 $c 2021
300 $a 1 online resource (189 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Narayan, Anupama.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Tulsa, 2021.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The purpose of this dissertation is to examine the impact that actual and perceived diversity within a team can have on team effectiveness. The majority of diversity research has been conducted on surface-level diversity variables, but deep-level variables are more impactful on team effectiveness (Tu, Hong, Jiang, & Zhang, 2020). This research project used the compositional diversity framework developed by Harrison and Klein (2007) to operationalize individual difference variables as deep-level diversity variables. This framework splits diversity variables into one of three diversity types, with each type having predetermined linear relationships with team outcomes. In addition to diversity, team members also form perceptions of the diversity on the team, and although related, the diversity on a team and the diversity that is perceived on a team are distinct concepts (Shemla, Meyer, Greer, & Jehn, 2016). It was hypothesized that in addition to the diversity variables having their predetermined relationships with team effectivess outcomes, perceived diversity would be more related to subjective outcomes (i.e., team satisfaction and team viability) than actual diversity, while actual diversity would be more related to objective outcomes (i.e., team performance) than perceived diversity.This study collected data from a single timepoint survey sent to college or university students who were working on 3-8-person team projects within their courses. Hierarchical regression was used to examine if diversity variables could predict team effectiveness variables above and beyond team-level variables. Support was found for diversity predicting team effectiveness above and beyond tea-level variables. Inconsistent support was found for the hypotheses; however, the results do make contributions to the field in several regards. First, this study found that actual and perceived diversity are not interchangeable constructs, and in fact, the relationship that diversity and perceived diversity have with one another vary by the construct in question. Second, diversity variables are important determinants of team effectiveness as evidenced by the relationships that diversity had with the team effectiveness variables. Third, team members vary in their perceptions of diversity within their own team, and oftentimes could not reliably rate the perceptions of team-level diversity. And fourth, the Harrison and Klein (2007) framework is a meaningful way to organize diversity variables. In fact, this study exhibited stronger relationships between diversity and outcomes as a previous meta-analysis (i.e., Bell, Villado, Lukasik, Belau, & Briggs, 2011) that used primarily surface-level variables, perhaps suggesting that the Harrison and Klein (2007) framework is well-suited to deep-level diversity variables.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 554804
650 4 $a Race. $3 561053
650 4 $a Multiculturalism & pluralism. $3 1465851
650 4 $a Teams. $3 1372465
650 4 $a Social activism. $3 1472066
650 4 $a Equality. $3 563228
650 4 $a Culture. $3 556041
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 555998
653 $a Deep-level diversity
653 $a Diversity conceptualization
653 $a Team effectiveness
653 $a Teams
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0624
690 $a 0451
710 2 $a The University of Tulsa. $b Industrial/Organizational Psychology. $3 1476334
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-04B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28498344 $z click for full text (PQDT)