國立虎尾科技大學 |

Assessing the construct validity of a measure of learning agility.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Assessing the construct validity of a measure of learning agility./
作者:	Connolly, James J.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (91 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 63-04, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International63-04B.
標題:	Quantitative psychology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780493238364

Assessing the construct validity of a measure of learning agility.
Connolly, James J.

Assessing the construct validity of a measure of learning agility. - 1 online resource (91 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 63-04, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Florida International University, 2001.

Includes bibliographical references

This study examined the construct validity of the Choices questionnaire that purported to support the theory of Learning Agility. Specifically, Learning Agility attempts to predict an individual's potential performance in new tasks. The construct validity will be measured by examining the convergent/discriminant validity of the Choices Questionnaire against a cognitive ability measure and two personality measures. The Choices Questionnaire did tap a construct that is unique to the cognitive ability and the personality measures, thus suggesting that this measure may have considerable value in personnel selection. This study also examined the relationship of this pew measure to job performance and job promotability. Results of this study found that the Choices Questionnaire predicted job performance and job promotability above and beyond cognitive ability and personality. Data from 107 law enforcement officers, along with two of their co-workers and a supervisor resulted in a correlation of .08 between Learning Agility and cognitive ability. Learning Agility correlated .07 with Learning Goal Orientation and. 17 with Performance Goal Orientation. Correlations with the Big Five Personality factors ranged from −.06 to. 13 with Conscientiousness and Openness to Experience, respectively. Learning Agility correlated .40 with supervisory ratings of job promotability and correlated .3 7 with supervisory ratings of overall job performance. Hierarchical regression analysis found incremental validity for Learning Agility over cognitive ability and the Big Five factors of personality for supervisory ratings of both promotability and overall job performance. A literature review was completed to integrate the Learning Agility construct into a nomological net of personnel selection research. Additionally, practical applications and future research directions are discussed.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780493238364Subjects--Topical Terms:

1182802
Quantitative psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Construct validityIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Assessing the construct validity of a measure of learning agility.
LDR:03247ntm a22003737 4500 001 1150073
005 20241022111535.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2001 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780493238364
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3013189
035 $a AAI3013189
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Connolly, James J. $3 1476492
245 1 0 $a Assessing the construct validity of a measure of learning agility.
264 0 $c 2001
300 $a 1 online resource (91 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 63-04, Section: B.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Viswesvaran, Chockalilngam.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Florida International University, 2001.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This study examined the construct validity of the Choices questionnaire that purported to support the theory of Learning Agility. Specifically, Learning Agility attempts to predict an individual's potential performance in new tasks. The construct validity will be measured by examining the convergent/discriminant validity of the Choices Questionnaire against a cognitive ability measure and two personality measures. The Choices Questionnaire did tap a construct that is unique to the cognitive ability and the personality measures, thus suggesting that this measure may have considerable value in personnel selection. This study also examined the relationship of this pew measure to job performance and job promotability. Results of this study found that the Choices Questionnaire predicted job performance and job promotability above and beyond cognitive ability and personality. Data from 107 law enforcement officers, along with two of their co-workers and a supervisor resulted in a correlation of .08 between Learning Agility and cognitive ability. Learning Agility correlated .07 with Learning Goal Orientation and. 17 with Performance Goal Orientation. Correlations with the Big Five Personality factors ranged from −.06 to. 13 with Conscientiousness and Openness to Experience, respectively. Learning Agility correlated .40 with supervisory ratings of job promotability and correlated .3 7 with supervisory ratings of overall job performance. Hierarchical regression analysis found incremental validity for Learning Agility over cognitive ability and the Big Five factors of personality for supervisory ratings of both promotability and overall job performance. A literature review was completed to integrate the Learning Agility construct into a nomological net of personnel selection research. Additionally, practical applications and future research directions are discussed.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Quantitative psychology. $3 1182802
650 4 $a Psychological tests. $3 640018
653 $a Construct validity
653 $a Job performance
653 $a Learning
653 $a Personnel selection
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0632
710 2 $a Florida International University. $3 1476493
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 63-04B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3013189 $z click for full text (PQDT)