國立虎尾科技大學 |

Poster, Performed : = Understanding Public Opinions of Authorship in Generative Artificial Intelligence Models via Analogy.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Poster, Performed :/
其他題名:	Understanding Public Opinions of Authorship in Generative Artificial Intelligence Models via Analogy.
作者:	Kasai, Wylie Z.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (61 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International85-12.
標題:	Museum studies. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798383034385

Poster, Performed : = Understanding Public Opinions of Authorship in Generative Artificial Intelligence Models via Analogy.
Kasai, Wylie Z.

Poster, Performed :Understanding Public Opinions of Authorship in Generative Artificial Intelligence Models via Analogy. - 1 online resource (61 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12.

Thesis (M.S.)--Dartmouth College, 2024.

Includes bibliographical references

Over the last decade, generative artificial intelligence models have advanced significantly and provided the public with several tools to create new works of art. However, the true authorship of these works has been debated due to their training on web-scraped data. Serving as an analogy to these larger models, Poster, Performedis an interactive artificial intelligence exhibition project that uses image assets submitted by the public to create poster compositions with custom image processing algorithms. During the course of a four-day exhibition, visitors were asked to identify the exhibition's primary artist from five options: (1) participants who submitted image assets, (2) the programmer, (3) the artificial intelligence software, (4) the exhibition's design team, and (5) the printers that output the posters. Survey data revealed that the participants who submitted image assets and the exhibition's project team were the project's most salient artists, each tied for the most responses. Within the analogy to state-of-the-art models, this finding implies that artworks produced with these generative tools would be best credited to the users who prompted the works and the original authors of the content used for model training.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798383034385Subjects--Topical Terms:

1179596
Museum studies.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Poster, Performed : = Understanding Public Opinions of Authorship in Generative Artificial Intelligence Models via Analogy.
LDR:02587ntm a22003737 4500 001 1150179
005 20241022111608.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2024 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798383034385
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31182160
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Dartmouth_masterstheses1134
035 $a AAI31182160
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Kasai, Wylie Z. $3 1476615
245 1 0 $a Poster, Performed : $b Understanding Public Opinions of Authorship in Generative Artificial Intelligence Models via Analogy.
264 0 $c 2024
300 $a 1 online resource (61 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12.
500 $a Advisor: Loeb, Lorie;Treacy, Tricia;Tregubov, Tim.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Dartmouth College, 2024.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Over the last decade, generative artificial intelligence models have advanced significantly and provided the public with several tools to create new works of art. However, the true authorship of these works has been debated due to their training on web-scraped data. Serving as an analogy to these larger models, Poster, Performedis an interactive artificial intelligence exhibition project that uses image assets submitted by the public to create poster compositions with custom image processing algorithms. During the course of a four-day exhibition, visitors were asked to identify the exhibition's primary artist from five options: (1) participants who submitted image assets, (2) the programmer, (3) the artificial intelligence software, (4) the exhibition's design team, and (5) the printers that output the posters. Survey data revealed that the participants who submitted image assets and the exhibition's project team were the project's most salient artists, each tied for the most responses. Within the analogy to state-of-the-art models, this finding implies that artworks produced with these generative tools would be best credited to the users who prompted the works and the original authors of the content used for model training.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Museum studies. $3 1179596
650 4 $a Arts management. $3 1183332
650 4 $a Painting. $3 1131865
650 4 $a Posters. $3 1476618
650 4 $a Printers. $3 883384
650 4 $a Python. $3 1115944
650 4 $a Libraries. $3 933781
650 4 $a Dadaism. $3 1113106
650 4 $a Design. $3 595500
650 4 $a Authorship. $3 566803
650 4 $a Art exhibits. $3 1466679
650 4 $a Book fairs. $3 1476617
650 4 $a Drawing. $3 811368
650 4 $a Audience participation. $3 1476616
650 4 $a Photographs. $3 658117
650 4 $a Flooring. $3 1465761
650 4 $a Artists. $3 660603
650 4 $a Java. $3 1115949
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0800
690 $a 0424
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0730
710 2 $a Dartmouth College. $b Computer Science. $3 1182313
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 85-12.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31182160 $z click for full text (PQDT)