國立虎尾科技大學 |

An examination of the efficacy of classical and Bayesian meta-analysis approaches for addressing important meta-analysis objectives.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An examination of the efficacy of classical and Bayesian meta-analysis approaches for addressing important meta-analysis objectives./
作者:	Findley, Jill Lucas.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (289 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 73-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International73-03A.
標題:	Quantitative psychology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781124861661

An examination of the efficacy of classical and Bayesian meta-analysis approaches for addressing important meta-analysis objectives.
Findley, Jill Lucas.

An examination of the efficacy of classical and Bayesian meta-analysis approaches for addressing important meta-analysis objectives. - 1 online resource (289 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 73-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of New York, 2011.

Includes bibliographical references

This paper examines the efficacy of classical versus Bayesian meta-analytic models for addressing the five important meta-analytic objectives that were proposed by Higgins, Thompson, and Spiegelhalter (2009). In addition, it presents and examines a sixth important meta-analytic objective within the classical and Bayesian frameworks - a consideration of how meta-analytic inferences may change depending upon the uncertainty in the estimate of the amount of heterogeneity. In order to meet this sixth objective, this study uses a classification system which follows the guidelines proposed by Rothstein, Sutton, and Borenstein (2005) for describing the impact of publication bias. Here, the impact of the way meta-analytic results may change depending upon the uncertainty in the heterogeneity is classified with the use of qualitative indicators akin to those used by Rothstein et al. (2005). Thus, the discrepancy between the best-fitting meta-analytic model and the meta-analytic models used for heterogeneity sensitivity analyses is described as: (a) "minimal", when the fitted meta-analytic models and the estimates remain similar; (b) "modest", when the fitted meta-analytic models remain the same, but the estimates change to a moderate degree; and (c) "severe", when the fitted meta-analytic models and estimates differ substantially from each other. This research suggests that Bayesian hierarchical linear modeling offers the most complete and accurate approach for addressing all relevant meta-analytic objectives. The project uses five different meta-analytic datasets as illustrative examples. It also provides examples of the code for the classical models for the metafor package, the Bayesian code for the WinBUGS package, and the S-PLUS code for the Bayesian hblm function. Given the complexity and nuances associated with Bayesian model development, a Bayesian quality assurance meta-analysis checklist was refined for this research project. The use of meta-analytic trace plots produced with the hblm function, which depict the dependency of meta-analytic results on the values of the standard deviation of the between-study variance, is shown to summarize the essence of a fully Bayesian meta-analysis. In a single picture, these plots summarize four out of five of Higgins et al.'s (2009) important metaanalytic objectives. Furthermore, meta-analytic trace plots also provide the additional, important (though underappreciated) advantage of representing how meta-analytic estimates change depending upon the uncertainty in the estimate of the amount of heterogeneity. This paper suggests that the future design of meta-analytic trace plots should also include inlaid curves that depict the estimates for the predicted effect in a new study so that all six important meta-analytic objectives could be addressed in a single graphic display.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781124861661Subjects--Topical Terms:

1182802
Quantitative psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Bayesian meta-analysisIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

An examination of the efficacy of classical and Bayesian meta-analysis approaches for addressing important meta-analysis objectives.
LDR:04348ntm a22004097 4500 001 1150689
005 20241028051833.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2011 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781124861661
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3469784
035 $a (MiAaPQ)minarees:11255
035 $a AAI3469784
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Findley, Jill Lucas. $3 1477240
245 1 3 $a An examination of the efficacy of classical and Bayesian meta-analysis approaches for addressing important meta-analysis objectives.
264 0 $c 2011
300 $a 1 online resource (289 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 73-03, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Rindskopf, David.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of New York, 2011.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This paper examines the efficacy of classical versus Bayesian meta-analytic models for addressing the five important meta-analytic objectives that were proposed by Higgins, Thompson, and Spiegelhalter (2009). In addition, it presents and examines a sixth important meta-analytic objective within the classical and Bayesian frameworks - a consideration of how meta-analytic inferences may change depending upon the uncertainty in the estimate of the amount of heterogeneity. In order to meet this sixth objective, this study uses a classification system which follows the guidelines proposed by Rothstein, Sutton, and Borenstein (2005) for describing the impact of publication bias. Here, the impact of the way meta-analytic results may change depending upon the uncertainty in the heterogeneity is classified with the use of qualitative indicators akin to those used by Rothstein et al. (2005). Thus, the discrepancy between the best-fitting meta-analytic model and the meta-analytic models used for heterogeneity sensitivity analyses is described as: (a) "minimal", when the fitted meta-analytic models and the estimates remain similar; (b) "modest", when the fitted meta-analytic models remain the same, but the estimates change to a moderate degree; and (c) "severe", when the fitted meta-analytic models and estimates differ substantially from each other. This research suggests that Bayesian hierarchical linear modeling offers the most complete and accurate approach for addressing all relevant meta-analytic objectives. The project uses five different meta-analytic datasets as illustrative examples. It also provides examples of the code for the classical models for the metafor package, the Bayesian code for the WinBUGS package, and the S-PLUS code for the Bayesian hblm function. Given the complexity and nuances associated with Bayesian model development, a Bayesian quality assurance meta-analysis checklist was refined for this research project. The use of meta-analytic trace plots produced with the hblm function, which depict the dependency of meta-analytic results on the values of the standard deviation of the between-study variance, is shown to summarize the essence of a fully Bayesian meta-analysis. In a single picture, these plots summarize four out of five of Higgins et al.'s (2009) important metaanalytic objectives. Furthermore, meta-analytic trace plots also provide the additional, important (though underappreciated) advantage of representing how meta-analytic estimates change depending upon the uncertainty in the estimate of the amount of heterogeneity. This paper suggests that the future design of meta-analytic trace plots should also include inlaid curves that depict the estimates for the predicted effect in a new study so that all six important meta-analytic objectives could be addressed in a single graphic display.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Quantitative psychology. $3 1182802
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 555103
650 4 $a Statistics. $3 556824
653 $a Bayesian meta-analysis
653 $a Heterogeneity
653 $a Meta-analysis
653 $a Trace plots
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0463
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0632
710 2 $a City University of New York. $b Educational Psychology. $3 1466431
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 73-03A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3469784 $z click for full text (PQDT)