國立虎尾科技大學 |

Australia's Extraterritorial Human Rights Law Obligations.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Australia's Extraterritorial Human Rights Law Obligations./
作者:	Horvath, Szabina.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (369 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-02A.
標題:	International law. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798379969585

Australia's Extraterritorial Human Rights Law Obligations.
Horvath, Szabina.

Australia's Extraterritorial Human Rights Law Obligations. - 1 online resource (369 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Australian National University (Australia), 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

This thesis considers Australia's extraterritorial international human rights law (IHRL) obligations.The thesis acknowledges the dominant approach to considering extraterritorial human rights obligations is known as 'effective control'. The thesis accepts that 'effective control' may be the definition ascribed to 'jurisdiction' in the European Charter of Human Rights (ECHR). However, Australia is not a party to the ECHR, and there is no legal basis for ascribing the effective control test to determining the extraterritorial operation of Australia's IHRL obligations.The thesis argues that, when determining Australia's extraterritorial IHRL obligations, it is necessary to:Consider the relevant IHRL obligation to determine the jurisdiction nexus that gives rise to the obligation. The relevant nexus may be jurisdiction, state agent, territory or a residual nexus. Assess whether the relevant nexus exists in the specific situation in which Australia is acting extraterritorially. If the relevant nexus does exist, the extraterritorial IHRL obligation is owed, and consideration must be given to whether there are any additional (legal) matters that affect the scope/nature of the extraterritorial IHRL obligation. Australia must then consider what it will do to fulfil the extraterritorial IHRL obligation.The thesis considers the potential extraterritorial operation of the jus cogens, United Nations Convention of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (UNCAT) and International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) prohibitions of torture. The potential extraterritorial operation of the prohibitions are assessed through the application of fundamental principles of international law and by reference to state practice (including the use of case studies). The key conclusions from that analysis are brought together in a decision-making matrix that assists in establishing when extraterritorial IHRL obligations are owed. The matrix is then tested using the prohibition of arbitrary detention (in ICCPR) and the non-refoulement obligation (in UNCAT). The testing confirms the validity and adaptability of the matrix.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798379969585Subjects--Topical Terms:

557047
International law.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Armed conflictIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Australia's Extraterritorial Human Rights Law Obligations.
LDR:03595ntm a22004097 4500 001 1150811
005 20241029122325.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798379969585
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30571845
035 $a AAI30571845
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Horvath, Szabina. $3 1477403
245 1 0 $a Australia's Extraterritorial Human Rights Law Obligations.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (369 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: McLaughlin, Robert.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Australian National University (Australia), 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This thesis considers Australia's extraterritorial international human rights law (IHRL) obligations.The thesis acknowledges the dominant approach to considering extraterritorial human rights obligations is known as 'effective control'. The thesis accepts that 'effective control' may be the definition ascribed to 'jurisdiction' in the European Charter of Human Rights (ECHR). However, Australia is not a party to the ECHR, and there is no legal basis for ascribing the effective control test to determining the extraterritorial operation of Australia's IHRL obligations.The thesis argues that, when determining Australia's extraterritorial IHRL obligations, it is necessary to:Consider the relevant IHRL obligation to determine the jurisdiction nexus that gives rise to the obligation. The relevant nexus may be jurisdiction, state agent, territory or a residual nexus. Assess whether the relevant nexus exists in the specific situation in which Australia is acting extraterritorially. If the relevant nexus does exist, the extraterritorial IHRL obligation is owed, and consideration must be given to whether there are any additional (legal) matters that affect the scope/nature of the extraterritorial IHRL obligation. Australia must then consider what it will do to fulfil the extraterritorial IHRL obligation.The thesis considers the potential extraterritorial operation of the jus cogens, United Nations Convention of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (UNCAT) and International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) prohibitions of torture. The potential extraterritorial operation of the prohibitions are assessed through the application of fundamental principles of international law and by reference to state practice (including the use of case studies). The key conclusions from that analysis are brought together in a decision-making matrix that assists in establishing when extraterritorial IHRL obligations are owed. The matrix is then tested using the prohibition of arbitrary detention (in ICCPR) and the non-refoulement obligation (in UNCAT). The testing confirms the validity and adaptability of the matrix.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a International law. $3 557047
650 4 $a Law. $3 671705
653 $a Armed conflict
653 $a Australia
653 $a Effective control
653 $a Extraterritorial human rights
653 $a Human rights
653 $a Jurisdiction
653 $a IHRL obligations
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0616
710 2 $a The Australian National University (Australia). $b Law. $3 1477404
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-02A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30571845 $z click for full text (PQDT)