國立虎尾科技大學 |

Process Tracing Investigation into Problem-Solving within Residential Real Estate Appraisal.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Process Tracing Investigation into Problem-Solving within Residential Real Estate Appraisal./
作者:	Diaz, Julian, III.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (310 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 48-07, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International48-07A.
標題:	Descriptive research. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798207082790

Process Tracing Investigation into Problem-Solving within Residential Real Estate Appraisal.
Diaz, Julian, III.

Process Tracing Investigation into Problem-Solving within Residential Real Estate Appraisal. - 1 online resource (310 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 48-07, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgia State University, 1987.

Includes bibliographical references

The goal of this investigation is to initiate research into problem solving in one ill-structured domain using the theories and findings of well-structured problem solving as a foundation. A process tracing technique was employed to study the problem solving behavior of twelve students and twelve experts in residential real estate appraisal. To compare subject processes, protocols were conceptualized as frequency distributions and were compared using Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit tests. Other nonparametric techniques were employed to examine single point response variables. Experts were discovered to solve appraisal problems in a manner inconsistent with the normative model, the Appraisal Process. This nonnormative behavior held when task settings were familiar to the subject as well as when tasks had unfamiliar locational settings. Student behavior also was nonnormative. This finding prevented the straightforward extension of well-structured problem solving theories into this ill-structured environment. Neither experts nor students could recall the normative model indicating that the departure from normative behavior was not deliberated at a conscious level. Experts were found to spend less time than students on information search. Experts also were found to spend less time on information search with the locationally unfamiliar task than with the familiar task. This tendency may be evidence of an heuristic with the potential to produce suboptimal judgments. On a less statistically formal level, the observation was made that expert behavior was less cognitively demanding than the normative model. Similarly, two general information search strategies were observed. The strategy favored by experts could not guarantee optimal selections but was less cognitively demanding than the search strategy favored by students. The tendency to minimize cognitive effort is the finding which unifies this investigation. Implications for future research are discussed.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798207082790Subjects--Topical Terms:

1477823
Descriptive research.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Process Tracing Investigation into Problem-Solving within Residential Real Estate Appraisal.
LDR:03203ntm a22003257 4500 001 1151123
005 20241104055718.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s1987 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798207082790
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI8726477
035 $a AAI8726477
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Diaz, Julian, III. $3 1477821
245 1 0 $a Process Tracing Investigation into Problem-Solving within Residential Real Estate Appraisal.
264 0 $c 1987
300 $a 1 online resource (310 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 48-07, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgia State University, 1987.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The goal of this investigation is to initiate research into problem solving in one ill-structured domain using the theories and findings of well-structured problem solving as a foundation. A process tracing technique was employed to study the problem solving behavior of twelve students and twelve experts in residential real estate appraisal. To compare subject processes, protocols were conceptualized as frequency distributions and were compared using Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit tests. Other nonparametric techniques were employed to examine single point response variables. Experts were discovered to solve appraisal problems in a manner inconsistent with the normative model, the Appraisal Process. This nonnormative behavior held when task settings were familiar to the subject as well as when tasks had unfamiliar locational settings. Student behavior also was nonnormative. This finding prevented the straightforward extension of well-structured problem solving theories into this ill-structured environment. Neither experts nor students could recall the normative model indicating that the departure from normative behavior was not deliberated at a conscious level. Experts were found to spend less time than students on information search. Experts also were found to spend less time on information search with the locationally unfamiliar task than with the familiar task. This tendency may be evidence of an heuristic with the potential to produce suboptimal judgments. On a less statistically formal level, the observation was made that expert behavior was less cognitively demanding than the normative model. Similarly, two general information search strategies were observed. The strategy favored by experts could not guarantee optimal selections but was less cognitively demanding than the search strategy favored by students. The tendency to minimize cognitive effort is the finding which unifies this investigation. Implications for future research are discussed.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Descriptive research. $3 1477823
650 4 $a Internal validity. $3 1472357
650 4 $a Semantics. $3 555362
650 4 $a Learning. $3 555256
650 4 $a Paradigms. $3 1469375
650 4 $a Information processing. $3 1473673
650 4 $a Probability. $3 667790
650 4 $a Design. $3 595500
650 4 $a Copyright. $3 561990
650 4 $a Decision making. $3 528319
650 4 $a Knowledge. $3 643484
650 4 $a Hypotheses. $3 1372657
650 4 $a Human performance. $3 1372464
650 4 $a Validity. $3 1471173
650 4 $a Research methodology. $3 1372463
650 4 $a Cognition & reasoning. $3 1372461
650 4 $a Short term. $3 1413640
650 4 $a Heuristic. $3 573354
650 4 $a Traditions. $3 1372646
650 4 $a Appraisers. $3 1477822
650 4 $a Discriminant analysis. $3 1116533
650 4 $a Memory. $3 555749
650 4 $a Students. $3 1023836
650 4 $a Problem solving. $3 527887
650 4 $a Studies. $3 1437762
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0310
690 $a 0389
710 2 $a Georgia State University. $3 1184577
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 48-07A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=8726477 $z click for full text (PQDT)