國立虎尾科技大學 |

The trouble with the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) : = Deconstructing common assumptions and developing a new approach to "cybersquatting".

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The trouble with the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) :/
Reminder of title:	Deconstructing common assumptions and developing a new approach to "cybersquatting".
Author:	Lamothe-Samson, Madeleine.
Description:	1 online resource (173 pages)
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 63-09.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International63-09.
Subject:	Law. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780612630826

The trouble with the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) : = Deconstructing common assumptions and developing a new approach to "cybersquatting".
Lamothe-Samson, Madeleine.

The trouble with the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) :Deconstructing common assumptions and developing a new approach to "cybersquatting". - 1 online resource (173 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 63-09.

Thesis (LL.M.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2001.

Includes bibliographical references

This thesis challenges the association between cybersquatting and trademark infringement. It shows that only a small number of domain name/trademark disputes constitute trademark infringement, passing off or dilution as prohibited in Canada and the Unites States. It argues that it is a mistake to use trademark law to justify the granting of relief against "cybersquatting", because it amounts to an unjustified expansion of trademark owner's rights over the general public's freedom to use trademarks for non-trademark purposes. It then argues that in order to reduce the number of bad decisions under the ICANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), it is necessary to identify what exactly is wrong with cybersquatting. After concluding that none of the rationales most often put forward are truly satisfactory, this thesis suggests that the civil law doctrine of abuse of rights is a better legal framework for dispute resolution mechanisms like the UDRP.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780612630826Subjects--Topical Terms:

671705
Law.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

The trouble with the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) : = Deconstructing common assumptions and developing a new approach to "cybersquatting".
LDR:02290ntm a22003377 4500 001 1151143
005 20241104055722.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2001 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780612630826
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAIMQ63082
035 $a AAIMQ63082
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Lamothe-Samson, Madeleine. $3 1477844
245 1 4 $a The trouble with the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) : $b Deconstructing common assumptions and developing a new approach to "cybersquatting".
264 0 $c 2001
300 $a 1 online resource (173 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 63-09.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Drassinower, Abraham.
502 $a Thesis (LL.M.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2001.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This thesis challenges the association between cybersquatting and trademark infringement. It shows that only a small number of domain name/trademark disputes constitute trademark infringement, passing off or dilution as prohibited in Canada and the Unites States. It argues that it is a mistake to use trademark law to justify the granting of relief against "cybersquatting", because it amounts to an unjustified expansion of trademark owner's rights over the general public's freedom to use trademarks for non-trademark purposes. It then argues that in order to reduce the number of bad decisions under the ICANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), it is necessary to identify what exactly is wrong with cybersquatting. After concluding that none of the rationales most often put forward are truly satisfactory, this thesis suggests that the civil law doctrine of abuse of rights is a better legal framework for dispute resolution mechanisms like the UDRP.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Law. $3 671705
650 4 $a Mass media. $3 556421
650 4 $a Mass communications. $3 1335238
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0708
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Toronto (Canada). $3 1182602
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 63-09.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=MQ63082 $z click for full text (PQDT)