國立虎尾科技大學 |

Examining the Impact of Methodology on the Positivity Effect : = A Meta-Analysis.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Examining the Impact of Methodology on the Positivity Effect :/
其他題名:	A Meta-Analysis.
作者:	Schwartz, Temima Devora.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (69 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-02B.
標題:	Psychology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798383623718

Examining the Impact of Methodology on the Positivity Effect : = A Meta-Analysis.
Schwartz, Temima Devora.

Examining the Impact of Methodology on the Positivity Effect :A Meta-Analysis. - 1 online resource (69 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fielding Graduate University, 2024.

Includes bibliographical references

An age-related bias toward positive information in the older adult population has been identified by the literature and termed "the positivity effect." Many studies have been conducted to examine specific aspects of the positivity effect. However, those studies have introduced confounding variables, making the size of the actual positivity effect present in the overall older adult population difficult to estimate. Additionally, the methodology used by researchers has varied widely, raising the question of whether the effects observed by different studies are comparable. The goal of the present meta-analysis was to examine the overall effect size of the attentional positivity effect observed in the literature, as well as to examine the impact of methodological differences across studies on the effect sizes found. Thirty one studies were included in the meta-analysis. Meta-regression analyses were performed to examine the ability of stimulus type, attention bias measure, stimulus pairing, and effect type to explain variability in effect sizes across the sample. Results found a small aggregate effect size. Effect size variability was significantly explained by attention bias measure and effect type but not by stimulus type or stimulus pairing. Additionally, differences in the overall effect sizes of categories within each meta-regression variable were apparent, some of which were statistically significant.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798383623718Subjects--Topical Terms:

555998
Psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Meta-analysisIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Examining the Impact of Methodology on the Positivity Effect : = A Meta-Analysis.
LDR:02863ntm a22004217 4500 001 1151621
005 20241112095404.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2024 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798383623718
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31486048
035 $a AAI31486048
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Schwartz, Temima Devora. $3 1478424
245 1 0 $a Examining the Impact of Methodology on the Positivity Effect : $b A Meta-Analysis.
264 0 $c 2024
300 $a 1 online resource (69 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Levin, Leanne J.;Cornelius, Allen E.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fielding Graduate University, 2024.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a An age-related bias toward positive information in the older adult population has been identified by the literature and termed "the positivity effect." Many studies have been conducted to examine specific aspects of the positivity effect. However, those studies have introduced confounding variables, making the size of the actual positivity effect present in the overall older adult population difficult to estimate. Additionally, the methodology used by researchers has varied widely, raising the question of whether the effects observed by different studies are comparable. The goal of the present meta-analysis was to examine the overall effect size of the attentional positivity effect observed in the literature, as well as to examine the impact of methodological differences across studies on the effect sizes found. Thirty one studies were included in the meta-analysis. Meta-regression analyses were performed to examine the ability of stimulus type, attention bias measure, stimulus pairing, and effect type to explain variability in effect sizes across the sample. Results found a small aggregate effect size. Effect size variability was significantly explained by attention bias measure and effect type but not by stimulus type or stimulus pairing. Additionally, differences in the overall effect sizes of categories within each meta-regression variable were apparent, some of which were statistically significant.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 555998
650 4 $a Gerontology. $3 559846
650 4 $a Personality psychology. $3 1180475
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 554804
650 4 $a Aging. $3 559847
653 $a Meta-analysis
653 $a Meta-regression
653 $a Older adult
653 $a Positivity bias
653 $a Positivity effect
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0351
690 $a 0625
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0493
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Fielding Graduate University. $b The School of Psychology. $3 1464672
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-02B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31486048 $z click for full text (PQDT)