國立虎尾科技大學 |

Digital Platform Economics : = Essays on Innovation Effects, Assessment of Market Power, and Policy Approaches to Promote Competition.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Digital Platform Economics :/
其他題名:	Essays on Innovation Effects, Assessment of Market Power, and Policy Approaches to Promote Competition.
作者:	Sousa Prado, Tiago.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (267 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-02A.
標題:	Public policy. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798380101868

Digital Platform Economics : = Essays on Innovation Effects, Assessment of Market Power, and Policy Approaches to Promote Competition.
Sousa Prado, Tiago.

Digital Platform Economics :Essays on Innovation Effects, Assessment of Market Power, and Policy Approaches to Promote Competition. - 1 online resource (267 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

The rise of digital platforms as a business model and a critical infrastructure for the digital economy is causing increasing trepidation among scholars and competition policy enforcers. In response to concerns about negative effects of platform dominance on investment and innovation, policies that were in place since the 1990s to keep the digital economy free from traditional regulation are being reconsidered. In these discussions, competition is considered an essential mechanism to harness the social and economic benefits of digital platforms, as it serves to attenuate potential risks to innovation, democracy, and to the media industry.This dissertation contributes to these discussions theoretically and empirically. It addresses three important, interrelated aspects of the debate. Self-contained chapters explore the challenges of designing comprehensive responses to safeguard and promote competition in digital markets. One of the topics investigated is whether digital platforms harm sector innovation by acquiring too many start-up firms. This analysis uses a unique data set of venture capital, IPO, and M&A activity that includes more than 40 thousand deals reported worldwide between 2010 and 2020. A second topic is the development of an empirically tested, conceptual framework for the assessment of market power in digital markets. The insights gained from exploring these two topics are then integrated into a discussion of alternative scenarios for the design of policy and regulatory regimes that aim at promoting competition for and on digital platforms. The empirical analysis of hundreds of big tech start-up acquisitions shows that venture capital funding for innovation increased after the acquisitions analyzed. However, this effect is short-lived and other concerns arise. The findings suggest that a closer review of these mergers by better-equipped competition policy enforcers would be beneficial to deal with the complexities of digital markets. Although new competition policy instruments may be needed, strict ex ante remedies may not bring the right incentives to promote digital innovation.The proposed conceptual framework for market power assessment showed the need for new tests in addition to the traditional evaluation of the competitive structure of platform markets. Also, it was possible to conclude that policy remedies, to have significant impact in promoting competition in digital markets, should be enforced jointly in both user- and supplier sides of the platforms. Furthermore, the results of an online survey experiment with 550 participants suggest that an analysis of user responses to different levels of digital ads and data collection procedures bundled with online services would greatly improve assessments of market power.Finally, the analysis of alternative proposals of competition policy and regulatory regimes for digital markets suggests that carefully designed remedies, that observe country-specific developmental conditions and challenges, are key to effectively promote competition without harming incentives for innovation and investment. The analysis also supports a very limited use of ex ante, policy remedies to boost competition for incumbent digital platforms.Overall, this dissertation expands scientific knowledge on how the strong benefits of the platform economy can be preserved while protecting competition and the incentives for innovation in digital markets. It develops theoretically and empirically grounded contributions that will help policymakers and regulatory agencies in the development of workable approaches to promote competition in digital markets. It also explores the complementarity of antitrust and regulation, and ways to better orchestrate these instruments with each other and with varying national and regional contexts.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798380101868Subjects--Topical Terms:

1002398
Public policy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

AntitrustIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Digital Platform Economics : = Essays on Innovation Effects, Assessment of Market Power, and Policy Approaches to Promote Competition.
LDR:05252ntm a22003977 4500 001 1151999
005 20241125080206.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798380101868
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30567911
035 $a AAI30567911
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Sousa Prado, Tiago. $3 1478869
245 1 0 $a Digital Platform Economics : $b Essays on Innovation Effects, Assessment of Market Power, and Policy Approaches to Promote Competition.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (267 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Bauer, Johannes M.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The rise of digital platforms as a business model and a critical infrastructure for the digital economy is causing increasing trepidation among scholars and competition policy enforcers. In response to concerns about negative effects of platform dominance on investment and innovation, policies that were in place since the 1990s to keep the digital economy free from traditional regulation are being reconsidered. In these discussions, competition is considered an essential mechanism to harness the social and economic benefits of digital platforms, as it serves to attenuate potential risks to innovation, democracy, and to the media industry.This dissertation contributes to these discussions theoretically and empirically. It addresses three important, interrelated aspects of the debate. Self-contained chapters explore the challenges of designing comprehensive responses to safeguard and promote competition in digital markets. One of the topics investigated is whether digital platforms harm sector innovation by acquiring too many start-up firms. This analysis uses a unique data set of venture capital, IPO, and M&A activity that includes more than 40 thousand deals reported worldwide between 2010 and 2020. A second topic is the development of an empirically tested, conceptual framework for the assessment of market power in digital markets. The insights gained from exploring these two topics are then integrated into a discussion of alternative scenarios for the design of policy and regulatory regimes that aim at promoting competition for and on digital platforms. The empirical analysis of hundreds of big tech start-up acquisitions shows that venture capital funding for innovation increased after the acquisitions analyzed. However, this effect is short-lived and other concerns arise. The findings suggest that a closer review of these mergers by better-equipped competition policy enforcers would be beneficial to deal with the complexities of digital markets. Although new competition policy instruments may be needed, strict ex ante remedies may not bring the right incentives to promote digital innovation.The proposed conceptual framework for market power assessment showed the need for new tests in addition to the traditional evaluation of the competitive structure of platform markets. Also, it was possible to conclude that policy remedies, to have significant impact in promoting competition in digital markets, should be enforced jointly in both user- and supplier sides of the platforms. Furthermore, the results of an online survey experiment with 550 participants suggest that an analysis of user responses to different levels of digital ads and data collection procedures bundled with online services would greatly improve assessments of market power.Finally, the analysis of alternative proposals of competition policy and regulatory regimes for digital markets suggests that carefully designed remedies, that observe country-specific developmental conditions and challenges, are key to effectively promote competition without harming incentives for innovation and investment. The analysis also supports a very limited use of ex ante, policy remedies to boost competition for incumbent digital platforms.Overall, this dissertation expands scientific knowledge on how the strong benefits of the platform economy can be preserved while protecting competition and the incentives for innovation in digital markets. It develops theoretically and empirically grounded contributions that will help policymakers and regulatory agencies in the development of workable approaches to promote competition in digital markets. It also explores the complementarity of antitrust and regulation, and ways to better orchestrate these instruments with each other and with varying national and regional contexts.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 1002398
650 4 $a Information science. $3 561178
653 $a Antitrust
653 $a Competition policy
653 $a Digital platform
653 $a Innovation
653 $a Market power
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0723
690 $a 0501
690 $a 0630
710 2 $a Michigan State University. $b Information and Media - Doctor of Philosophy. $3 1179320
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-02A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30567911 $z click for full text (PQDT)