國立虎尾科技大學 |

A Legislative Comparative Assessment of Challenging Arbitral Awards Under UNCITRAL Model Law : = A New Harmonised Proposed Model for Challenging Arbitral Awards.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	A Legislative Comparative Assessment of Challenging Arbitral Awards Under UNCITRAL Model Law :/
Reminder of title:	A New Harmonised Proposed Model for Challenging Arbitral Awards.
Author:	Odeibat, Mohammad A.
Description:	1 online resource (349 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-11B.
Subject:	Treaties. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798382641577

A Legislative Comparative Assessment of Challenging Arbitral Awards Under UNCITRAL Model Law : = A New Harmonised Proposed Model for Challenging Arbitral Awards.
Odeibat, Mohammad A.

A Legislative Comparative Assessment of Challenging Arbitral Awards Under UNCITRAL Model Law :A New Harmonised Proposed Model for Challenging Arbitral Awards. - 1 online resource (349 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Manchester (United Kingdom), 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

The issue of challenging arbitral awards is anaylsed in this thesis due to its fundamental and somewhat controversial nature within the field arbitration. This is because such an issue is an unavoidable necessity and is, at the same time, a source of difficulty that may jeopardise the principles and advantages of arbitration. Therefore, this thesis provides an examination of all the aspects related to the given issue. This examination is based on content analysis of over one hundred national arbitration legislations on the one hand and based on an in-depth analysis of the arbitration legislations and the jurisdictions (law cases) of Egypt, England and Jordan in light of the UNCITRAL Model Law (ML) on the other hand. Based on the arguments and the findings of this examination, the thesis will propose a model to harmonise the grounds related to the issue of challenging arbitral awards, including both the prerequisite grounds and legal grounds, in the same manner in which the New York Convention (NYC) attempted to harmonise the grounds for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. It is argued that the model proposed by the thesis is an attempt to highlight and emphasise the somewhat quasi-universal consensus in the wide spectrum of the legislations examined in the context of challenging arbitral awards. Therefore, it is expected that the comprehensiveness of the grounds for challenging arbitral awards in the proposed model and the rationales provided for the inclusion of each of these grounds will be convincing enough for as many countries as possible to ratify the proposed model when it is presented before them as an international convention. Indeed, the feasibility of enacting the proposed model as an international convention would not only be possible but would be very high. The enactment of such an international convention would encourage standardising the practices of national courts globally when addressing any challenges to arbitral awards. This in turn could minimise the chances of annulling arbitral awards due to local particularities and, therefore, safeguard the integrity of international arbitration as an international dispute resolution mechanism.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798382641577Subjects--Topical Terms:

570600
Treaties.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

A Legislative Comparative Assessment of Challenging Arbitral Awards Under UNCITRAL Model Law : = A New Harmonised Proposed Model for Challenging Arbitral Awards.
LDR:03686ntm a22003857 4500 001 1152163
005 20241122094141.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798382641577
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31040133
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Manchester_UK9fae34cf-0bd9-4578-8ef6-2663ade75b12
035 $a AAI31040133
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Odeibat, Mohammad A. $3 1479062
245 1 2 $a A Legislative Comparative Assessment of Challenging Arbitral Awards Under UNCITRAL Model Law : $b A New Harmonised Proposed Model for Challenging Arbitral Awards.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (349 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Tarawneh, Jasem;Butler, Nicolette.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Manchester (United Kingdom), 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The issue of challenging arbitral awards is anaylsed in this thesis due to its fundamental and somewhat controversial nature within the field arbitration. This is because such an issue is an unavoidable necessity and is, at the same time, a source of difficulty that may jeopardise the principles and advantages of arbitration. Therefore, this thesis provides an examination of all the aspects related to the given issue. This examination is based on content analysis of over one hundred national arbitration legislations on the one hand and based on an in-depth analysis of the arbitration legislations and the jurisdictions (law cases) of Egypt, England and Jordan in light of the UNCITRAL Model Law (ML) on the other hand. Based on the arguments and the findings of this examination, the thesis will propose a model to harmonise the grounds related to the issue of challenging arbitral awards, including both the prerequisite grounds and legal grounds, in the same manner in which the New York Convention (NYC) attempted to harmonise the grounds for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. It is argued that the model proposed by the thesis is an attempt to highlight and emphasise the somewhat quasi-universal consensus in the wide spectrum of the legislations examined in the context of challenging arbitral awards. Therefore, it is expected that the comprehensiveness of the grounds for challenging arbitral awards in the proposed model and the rationales provided for the inclusion of each of these grounds will be convincing enough for as many countries as possible to ratify the proposed model when it is presented before them as an international convention. Indeed, the feasibility of enacting the proposed model as an international convention would not only be possible but would be very high. The enactment of such an international convention would encourage standardising the practices of national courts globally when addressing any challenges to arbitral awards. This in turn could minimise the chances of annulling arbitral awards due to local particularities and, therefore, safeguard the integrity of international arbitration as an international dispute resolution mechanism.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Treaties. $3 570600
650 4 $a Investments. $3 557691
650 4 $a Sports arbitration. $3 1477846
650 4 $a Tourism. $3 558888
650 4 $a Disputes. $3 1466318
650 4 $a Litigation. $3 1476895
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 1002398
650 4 $a Alternative dispute resolution. $3 1184607
650 4 $a Kinesiology. $3 721210
650 4 $a Finance. $3 559073
650 4 $a Law. $3 671705
650 4 $a Recreation. $3 559433
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0649
690 $a 0575
690 $a 0508
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0814
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a The University of Manchester (United Kingdom). $3 1213791
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-11B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31040133 $z click for full text (PQDT)