國立虎尾科技大學 |

What Is Trauma? : = From Science to Social Justice.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	What Is Trauma? :/
其他題名:	From Science to Social Justice.
作者:	Carlisle, Judith.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (127 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-10, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-10B.
標題:	Clinical psychology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798382318257

What Is Trauma? : = From Science to Social Justice.
Carlisle, Judith.

What Is Trauma? :From Science to Social Justice. - 1 online resource (127 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-10, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Washington University in St. Louis, 2024.

Includes bibliographical references

In recent years, the term "trauma" has become increasingly controversial. Many of these controversies revolve around the definition of trauma, and the way that this definition varies across contexts. What kinds of experience can plausibly be considered "traumatic"? In some contexts, the standards are incredibly permissive, while others are much more restrictive. These different ways of understanding "trauma" prompts an important question: Who has the authority to define trauma? In other words, who decides which conception of trauma is the most "legitimate" - who decides when an experience is or is not traumatic? My project attempts to answer these questions by considering each of the different conceptions of trauma that arise in a variety of distinct contexts. In particular, I will recognize three major areas making use of the concept: I will attempt to outline the theories of trauma that arise from (1) The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), from (2) animal researchers in neuroscience and similar laboratory settings, from (3) theories of trauma in clinical psychology. Then, I argue that there is need for yet another conception, what I call the Social Ameliorative Conception of Trauma which helps us to acknowledge and recognize potentially novel kinds/cases of trauma. Finally, I conclude by attempting to unify these disparate perspectives with my Schematic Account of Trauma.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798382318257Subjects--Topical Terms:

649607
Clinical psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Social justiceIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

What Is Trauma? : = From Science to Social Justice.
LDR:02865ntm a22004337 4500 001 1152185
005 20241122094148.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2024 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798382318257
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31239943
035 $a AAI31239943
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Carlisle, Judith. $3 1479085
245 1 0 $a What Is Trauma? : $b From Science to Social Justice.
264 0 $c 2024
300 $a 1 online resource (127 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-10, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Craver, Carl.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Washington University in St. Louis, 2024.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a In recent years, the term "trauma" has become increasingly controversial. Many of these controversies revolve around the definition of trauma, and the way that this definition varies across contexts. What kinds of experience can plausibly be considered "traumatic"? In some contexts, the standards are incredibly permissive, while others are much more restrictive. These different ways of understanding "trauma" prompts an important question: Who has the authority to define trauma? In other words, who decides which conception of trauma is the most "legitimate" - who decides when an experience is or is not traumatic? My project attempts to answer these questions by considering each of the different conceptions of trauma that arise in a variety of distinct contexts. In particular, I will recognize three major areas making use of the concept: I will attempt to outline the theories of trauma that arise from (1) The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), from (2) animal researchers in neuroscience and similar laboratory settings, from (3) theories of trauma in clinical psychology. Then, I argue that there is need for yet another conception, what I call the Social Ameliorative Conception of Trauma which helps us to acknowledge and recognize potentially novel kinds/cases of trauma. Finally, I conclude by attempting to unify these disparate perspectives with my Schematic Account of Trauma.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 649607
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 554804
650 4 $a Mental health. $3 564038
650 4 $a Neurosciences. $3 593561
650 4 $a Therapy. $3 1181514
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 559771
653 $a Social justice
653 $a Post-traumatic stress disorder
653 $a Trauma
653 $a Disparate perspectives
653 $a Social ameliorative conception
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0212
690 $a 0317
690 $a 0347
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0451
710 2 $a Washington University in St. Louis. $b Philosophy-Neuroscience-Psychology. $3 1479086
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-10B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31239943 $z click for full text (PQDT)