國立虎尾科技大學 |

Self- Awareness Processes in Motivated Reasoning.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Self- Awareness Processes in Motivated Reasoning./
作者:	McKenna, Clint.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (108 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-12B.
標題:	Cognitive psychology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798382741284

Self- Awareness Processes in Motivated Reasoning.
McKenna, Clint.

Self- Awareness Processes in Motivated Reasoning. - 1 online resource (108 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2024.

Includes bibliographical references

People have limited introspective access to many mental processes. In this dissertation, I test whether people can report self-awareness of motivational influences. Specifically, I investigate the phenomenon of motivated reasoning, where people's decisions and evaluations of information are biased in favor or one's attitudes, beliefs, and identities. In six empirical studies, people show limited ability to report the extent that their prior beliefs influence their reasoning. In Studies 1 - 3, I demonstrate that people update their beliefs consistent with their motivations, but do not report awareness of this influence consistently, or in a manner that aligns with a peer's perception of them. In Studies 4-5, I show similar effects with a simulated political ballot counting task. Awareness was generally underreported relative to peers, but those who were greatly biased tended to report more perceived influence of political beliefs. Finally, in Study 6, I introduce an incentive-compatible reward task that maximizes the likelihood of honest responses. In this study, people evaluate the political ballots honestly, eliminating a possible counter-explanation about normative views of motivated evaluation. In sum, this dissertation advances our understanding of metacognitive processes related to motivated reasoning. I find that while people engage in motivated reasoning, they often underreport awareness of how their desires are influencing their decisions.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798382741284Subjects--Topical Terms:

556029
Cognitive psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

ReasoningIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Self- Awareness Processes in Motivated Reasoning.
LDR:02839ntm a22004097 4500 001 1152223
005 20241122094200.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2024 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798382741284
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31349136
035 $a (MiAaPQ)umichrackham005390
035 $a AAI31349136
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a McKenna, Clint. $3 1479131
245 1 0 $a Self- Awareness Processes in Motivated Reasoning.
264 0 $c 2024
300 $a 1 online resource (108 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Dunning, David.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2024.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a People have limited introspective access to many mental processes. In this dissertation, I test whether people can report self-awareness of motivational influences. Specifically, I investigate the phenomenon of motivated reasoning, where people's decisions and evaluations of information are biased in favor or one's attitudes, beliefs, and identities. In six empirical studies, people show limited ability to report the extent that their prior beliefs influence their reasoning. In Studies 1 - 3, I demonstrate that people update their beliefs consistent with their motivations, but do not report awareness of this influence consistently, or in a manner that aligns with a peer's perception of them. In Studies 4-5, I show similar effects with a simulated political ballot counting task. Awareness was generally underreported relative to peers, but those who were greatly biased tended to report more perceived influence of political beliefs. Finally, in Study 6, I introduce an incentive-compatible reward task that maximizes the likelihood of honest responses. In this study, people evaluate the political ballots honestly, eliminating a possible counter-explanation about normative views of motivated evaluation. In sum, this dissertation advances our understanding of metacognitive processes related to motivated reasoning. I find that while people engage in motivated reasoning, they often underreport awareness of how their desires are influencing their decisions.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 556029
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 554804
650 4 $a Personality psychology. $3 1180475
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 555998
653 $a Reasoning
653 $a Self-awareness
653 $a Politics
653 $a Metacognitive processes
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0625
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0451
710 2 $a University of Michigan. $b Psychology. $3 1184063
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-12B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31349136 $z click for full text (PQDT)