國立虎尾科技大學 |

Claiming the Right to Belong : = Diversity and the Politics of Inclusion in Queens, New York.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Claiming the Right to Belong :/
其他題名:	Diversity and the Politics of Inclusion in Queens, New York.
作者:	Tanenbaum, Susan.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (304 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-02A.
標題:	Theology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798383693353

Claiming the Right to Belong : = Diversity and the Politics of Inclusion in Queens, New York.
Tanenbaum, Susan.

Claiming the Right to Belong :Diversity and the Politics of Inclusion in Queens, New York. - 1 online resource (304 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of New York, 2024.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation examines social integration in a diverse civic and political mainstream. The social science research on intergroup contact in U.S. cities undergoing significant demographic change tends to focus on encounters between members of majority "in-groups" and minority "out-groups" in the context of workplaces, neighborhoods, and families. I contend that civic politics is another compelling strategic site for observing intergroup contact between emerging and established players. My study presents three cases of claims-making activity during the post-9/11 period in New York City's borough of Queens, where close to 50% of the population is foreign-born and no single racial group predominates. I explore how marginalized groups deploy claims to achieve the same rights already secured by other groups. Specifically, I interrogate how diversity itself shapes the negotiations, which can result in an expansion of social membership, signifying the enactment of inclusion.In the first case, Muslim organizers counter post-9/11 backlash by requesting official sponsorship of a public ritual through deployment of a recognition claim. In the second case, Asian immigrants navigate the contested terrain of a local political institution, the community board, as they assert placemaking claims. In the third case, majority Latine organizers mobilize working-class immigrants against the city's pro-growth coalition, opposing the threat of displacement through resistance claims. Drawing upon data from 60 in-depth interviews, participant observation, and a follow-up survey, I use a case study approach to consider the effect of larger social trends on these events, and to uncover social processes across events as well as over time.My findings indicate that diversity is a living dynamic, enabling emerging players to make claims and helping established players to "manage" demographic change. Structural factors place constraints on individual agency, but the instrumentality of many participants ensures that relational processes occur. Nonprofit leaders and grassroots organizers assume the position of key mobilizers, serving as proxies or conduits for newcomers. As diversity becomes increasingly normative, public officials invoke a pro-diversity message, and civic leaders engage in bridging activities.Key mobilizers form unusual alignments with interfaith allies, traditional gatekeepers, and intellectually progressive peers, which is a pivotal strategy for enacting inclusion. In particular, 1.5 and second-generation organizers (who arrived as children or were born in the U.S. to at least one immigrant parent) prioritize ideological commitments over loyalty to co-ethnic elected officials. This dynamic challenges the reification of race and ethnicity as explanatory factors for understanding coalition-building in a diverse context. The findings from these three cases also lend empirical support to the scholarship defining citizenship not in terms of formal legal status but as participation and practice. By participating in arenas where decision-making occurs, newcomer individuals and marginalized groups claim the right to belong in the local polity.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798383693353Subjects--Topical Terms:

559813
Theology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Civic engagementIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Claiming the Right to Belong : = Diversity and the Politics of Inclusion in Queens, New York.
LDR:04620ntm a22004097 4500 001 1152370
005 20241203090452.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2024 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798383693353
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31489351
035 $a AAI31489351
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Tanenbaum, Susan. $3 1479332
245 1 0 $a Claiming the Right to Belong : $b Diversity and the Politics of Inclusion in Queens, New York.
264 0 $c 2024
300 $a 1 online resource (304 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Kasinitz, Philip.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of New York, 2024.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation examines social integration in a diverse civic and political mainstream. The social science research on intergroup contact in U.S. cities undergoing significant demographic change tends to focus on encounters between members of majority "in-groups" and minority "out-groups" in the context of workplaces, neighborhoods, and families. I contend that civic politics is another compelling strategic site for observing intergroup contact between emerging and established players. My study presents three cases of claims-making activity during the post-9/11 period in New York City's borough of Queens, where close to 50% of the population is foreign-born and no single racial group predominates. I explore how marginalized groups deploy claims to achieve the same rights already secured by other groups. Specifically, I interrogate how diversity itself shapes the negotiations, which can result in an expansion of social membership, signifying the enactment of inclusion.In the first case, Muslim organizers counter post-9/11 backlash by requesting official sponsorship of a public ritual through deployment of a recognition claim. In the second case, Asian immigrants navigate the contested terrain of a local political institution, the community board, as they assert placemaking claims. In the third case, majority Latine organizers mobilize working-class immigrants against the city's pro-growth coalition, opposing the threat of displacement through resistance claims. Drawing upon data from 60 in-depth interviews, participant observation, and a follow-up survey, I use a case study approach to consider the effect of larger social trends on these events, and to uncover social processes across events as well as over time.My findings indicate that diversity is a living dynamic, enabling emerging players to make claims and helping established players to "manage" demographic change. Structural factors place constraints on individual agency, but the instrumentality of many participants ensures that relational processes occur. Nonprofit leaders and grassroots organizers assume the position of key mobilizers, serving as proxies or conduits for newcomers. As diversity becomes increasingly normative, public officials invoke a pro-diversity message, and civic leaders engage in bridging activities.Key mobilizers form unusual alignments with interfaith allies, traditional gatekeepers, and intellectually progressive peers, which is a pivotal strategy for enacting inclusion. In particular, 1.5 and second-generation organizers (who arrived as children or were born in the U.S. to at least one immigrant parent) prioritize ideological commitments over loyalty to co-ethnic elected officials. This dynamic challenges the reification of race and ethnicity as explanatory factors for understanding coalition-building in a diverse context. The findings from these three cases also lend empirical support to the scholarship defining citizenship not in terms of formal legal status but as participation and practice. By participating in arenas where decision-making occurs, newcomer individuals and marginalized groups claim the right to belong in the local polity.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Theology. $3 559813
650 4 $a Islamic studies. $2 bicssc $3 1008713
650 4 $a Sociology. $3 551705
653 $a Civic engagement
653 $a Immigrant incorporation
653 $a Intergroup contact
653 $a Islamophobia
653 $a Nonprofit organizations
653 $a Placemaking
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0626
690 $a 0512
690 $a 0469
710 2 $a City University of New York. $b Sociology. $3 1184415
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-02A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31489351 $z click for full text (PQDT)