國立虎尾科技大學 |

Chiseling the Glass Ceiling : = Institutional Barriers and the Gender Attrition Crisis in Large Law Firms, From Symbolism to Solutions.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Chiseling the Glass Ceiling :/
其他題名:	Institutional Barriers and the Gender Attrition Crisis in Large Law Firms, From Symbolism to Solutions.
作者:	Spoto, Meredith Katherine.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (102 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-03A.
標題:	Social structure. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798384455851

Chiseling the Glass Ceiling : = Institutional Barriers and the Gender Attrition Crisis in Large Law Firms, From Symbolism to Solutions.
Spoto, Meredith Katherine.

Chiseling the Glass Ceiling :Institutional Barriers and the Gender Attrition Crisis in Large Law Firms, From Symbolism to Solutions. - 1 online resource (102 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2024.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation is a compendium of three papers. It explores the multifaceted issues of gender inequality within large law firms, focusing on the persistent barriers faced by women and the impact of policies and practices aimed at mitigating these challenges. The three studies collectively examine the career trajectories of female lawyers, the role of mentorship, and the effects of domestic responsibilities, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, to provide a comprehensive understanding of the systemic and cultural obstacles that contribute to the gender attrition crisis in elite law firms.The first paper, "Law's Leaky Pipeline: An Examination of Gender-Based Attrition and Career Trajectories in Elite Law Firms," investigates the long-standing disparity in career progression between male and female lawyers. Despite an increase in the percentage of female lawyers, significant gaps remain, particularly in private practice. Through an analysis of career movements at four top-ranked large law firms from 2010 to the present, this study identifies the root causes of women's higher attrition rates, highlighting the compounded challenges faced by women of color.The second paper, "Mentorship Matters: Unpacking Gender Inequality in Big Law Before and During COVID-19," explores the critical role of mentorship in addressing gender disparities. Using original survey data from 187 associates at 15 leading U.S. law firms, the study reveals significant gender differences in mentorship experiences and functions. It examines the efficacy of formal mentorship programs in mitigating gender inequality and how these patterns evolved during the pandemic, ultimately questioning the effectiveness of current mentorship practices in supporting women's career advancement.The third paper, "Household Hurdles: Gender-Based Differences in Domestic Labor Among Law Firm Associates Amidst COVID-19," delves into the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on domestic labor divisions and work-from-home dynamics. Analyzing survey data from 331 attorneys, this study highlights the increased domestic responsibilities shouldered by female lawyers and the relative immutability of pre-existing gender disparities in domestic labor, despite the shift to remote work. It underscores the missed opportunity for greater gender equality in both personal and professional spheres and discusses the potential of flexible work policies to reduce gender inequality if implemented effectively post-pandemic.Together, these studies underscore the need for a holistic approach to dismantling institutional barriers and promoting gender equality in the legal profession. By examining the interplay of career trajectories, mentorship, and domestic responsibilities, this compendium contributes to the broader discourse on creating a more inclusive and equitable environment in large law firms.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798384455851Subjects--Topical Terms:

555182
Social structure.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Gender equityIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Chiseling the Glass Ceiling : = Institutional Barriers and the Gender Attrition Crisis in Large Law Firms, From Symbolism to Solutions.
LDR:04279ntm a22003857 4500 001 1152520
005 20241203090619.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2024 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798384455851
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31555765
035 $a AAI31555765
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Spoto, Meredith Katherine. $3 1479535
245 1 0 $a Chiseling the Glass Ceiling : $b Institutional Barriers and the Gender Attrition Crisis in Large Law Firms, From Symbolism to Solutions.
264 0 $c 2024
300 $a 1 online resource (102 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Albiston, Catherine.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2024.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation is a compendium of three papers. It explores the multifaceted issues of gender inequality within large law firms, focusing on the persistent barriers faced by women and the impact of policies and practices aimed at mitigating these challenges. The three studies collectively examine the career trajectories of female lawyers, the role of mentorship, and the effects of domestic responsibilities, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, to provide a comprehensive understanding of the systemic and cultural obstacles that contribute to the gender attrition crisis in elite law firms.The first paper, "Law's Leaky Pipeline: An Examination of Gender-Based Attrition and Career Trajectories in Elite Law Firms," investigates the long-standing disparity in career progression between male and female lawyers. Despite an increase in the percentage of female lawyers, significant gaps remain, particularly in private practice. Through an analysis of career movements at four top-ranked large law firms from 2010 to the present, this study identifies the root causes of women's higher attrition rates, highlighting the compounded challenges faced by women of color.The second paper, "Mentorship Matters: Unpacking Gender Inequality in Big Law Before and During COVID-19," explores the critical role of mentorship in addressing gender disparities. Using original survey data from 187 associates at 15 leading U.S. law firms, the study reveals significant gender differences in mentorship experiences and functions. It examines the efficacy of formal mentorship programs in mitigating gender inequality and how these patterns evolved during the pandemic, ultimately questioning the effectiveness of current mentorship practices in supporting women's career advancement.The third paper, "Household Hurdles: Gender-Based Differences in Domestic Labor Among Law Firm Associates Amidst COVID-19," delves into the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on domestic labor divisions and work-from-home dynamics. Analyzing survey data from 331 attorneys, this study highlights the increased domestic responsibilities shouldered by female lawyers and the relative immutability of pre-existing gender disparities in domestic labor, despite the shift to remote work. It underscores the missed opportunity for greater gender equality in both personal and professional spheres and discusses the potential of flexible work policies to reduce gender inequality if implemented effectively post-pandemic.Together, these studies underscore the need for a holistic approach to dismantling institutional barriers and promoting gender equality in the legal profession. By examining the interplay of career trajectories, mentorship, and domestic responsibilities, this compendium contributes to the broader discourse on creating a more inclusive and equitable environment in large law firms.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Social structure. $3 555182
650 4 $a Gender studies. $3 1179195
650 4 $a Sociology. $3 551705
653 $a Gender equity
653 $a Institutional factors
653 $a Law firms
653 $a Organizations
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0626
690 $a 0733
690 $a 0700
710 2 $a University of California, Berkeley. $b Jurisprudence & Social Policy. $3 1471307
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-03A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31555765 $z click for full text (PQDT)