國立虎尾科技大學 |

Observing and Mapping Group Arguments : = Majority Size and Valence Influences in Juries.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Observing and Mapping Group Arguments :/
其他題名:	Majority Size and Valence Influences in Juries.
作者:	Dyer, Shannon Sue.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (126 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-02A.
標題:	Law. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798380147958

Observing and Mapping Group Arguments : = Majority Size and Valence Influences in Juries.
Dyer, Shannon Sue.

Observing and Mapping Group Arguments :Majority Size and Valence Influences in Juries. - 1 online resource (126 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northwestern University, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation observes interaction to explore the influence of group argument in decision-making in mock juries. The goals of this investigation were to observe two-sided deliberations of a task-oriented decision-making group, map the dichotomous arguments and provide insight into what influences were at play in the final decision.The study provides a grounded theory that might narrow the gap between cognition and interaction research perspectives by creating similarities in the predeliberative, interaction, and postdeliberative measures. It examines argument influence by testing how the amount of support for a side in a group deliberation might relate to individual decision change. This study challenged the sensitivity of majority influence theories by using groups with two different margins of majority. It used high and low majority conditions to test the relationship of argument valence and the pressure to conform to the majority side. Finally, this investigation examined arguments over time, seeking new patterns and insights in a visual exploration of the influence process.There were limitations with a sample size that did not provide enough power for the conditions tested in the study. Nonetheless, there were indications that a quadratic relationship exists between majority and decision change: as the majority gets close to unanimous, the influence of social pressures to conform and change preference appeared stronger; as the proportion of the majority decreased toward equally divided group preferences, the influence of the interaction seemed to rise. However, argument valence, as tested, does not account for the interaction influence.Mapping the argument over time in a naturally occurring group revealed problems with the concept of consistency. A new definition of consistency is suggested, and a measure for persistence is recommended to combine with consistency for future studies. Persistent consistency would be a new variable that might address the complexity of influence in group argument topics. The visualization of patterns of valence over time in an area stream graph provides a snapshot of the entire deliberation and each participants contribution to the group valence.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798380147958Subjects--Topical Terms:

671705
Law.
Subjects--Index Terms:

ArgumentIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Observing and Mapping Group Arguments : = Majority Size and Valence Influences in Juries.
LDR:03619ntm a22004097 4500 001 1152591
005 20241209114604.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798380147958
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30566287
035 $a AAI30566287
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Dyer, Shannon Sue. $3 1479630
245 1 0 $a Observing and Mapping Group Arguments : $b Majority Size and Valence Influences in Juries.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (126 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Arntson, Paul.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northwestern University, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation observes interaction to explore the influence of group argument in decision-making in mock juries. The goals of this investigation were to observe two-sided deliberations of a task-oriented decision-making group, map the dichotomous arguments and provide insight into what influences were at play in the final decision.The study provides a grounded theory that might narrow the gap between cognition and interaction research perspectives by creating similarities in the predeliberative, interaction, and postdeliberative measures. It examines argument influence by testing how the amount of support for a side in a group deliberation might relate to individual decision change. This study challenged the sensitivity of majority influence theories by using groups with two different margins of majority. It used high and low majority conditions to test the relationship of argument valence and the pressure to conform to the majority side. Finally, this investigation examined arguments over time, seeking new patterns and insights in a visual exploration of the influence process.There were limitations with a sample size that did not provide enough power for the conditions tested in the study. Nonetheless, there were indications that a quadratic relationship exists between majority and decision change: as the majority gets close to unanimous, the influence of social pressures to conform and change preference appeared stronger; as the proportion of the majority decreased toward equally divided group preferences, the influence of the interaction seemed to rise. However, argument valence, as tested, does not account for the interaction influence.Mapping the argument over time in a naturally occurring group revealed problems with the concept of consistency. A new definition of consistency is suggested, and a measure for persistence is recommended to combine with consistency for future studies. Persistent consistency would be a new variable that might address the complexity of influence in group argument topics. The visualization of patterns of valence over time in an area stream graph provides a snapshot of the entire deliberation and each participants contribution to the group valence.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Law. $3 671705
650 4 $a Communication. $3 556422
653 $a Argument
653 $a Data visualization
653 $a Decision-making
653 $a Group influence
653 $a Interaction
653 $a Valence
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0703
710 2 $a Northwestern University. $b Communication Studies. $3 1191110
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-02A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30566287 $z click for full text (PQDT)