國立虎尾科技大學 |

The Role of Moral Conviction in Shaping Public Attitudes About Science and the Environment.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Role of Moral Conviction in Shaping Public Attitudes About Science and the Environment./
作者:	Bayes, Robin Alexandra Xu.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (265 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-11B.
標題:	Climate change. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798379586010

The Role of Moral Conviction in Shaping Public Attitudes About Science and the Environment.
Bayes, Robin Alexandra Xu.

The Role of Moral Conviction in Shaping Public Attitudes About Science and the Environment. - 1 online resource (265 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northwestern University, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

Despite high-profile exemplars in the cases of climate change, childhood vaccination, and the COVID-19 pandemic, public divides over science in the United States are not yet well-understood. Evidence suggests that people's issue positions can color how they engage with the science around the issue, driving them to ignore counter-attitudinal scientific evidence, doubt the credibility of scientists and studies that produce such evidence, and derogate others who hold a different position than their own as ignorant, stupid, or dishonest. In this project, I argue that one factor that may exacerbate these tendencies is moral conviction, or the perception that one's attitude on an issue is a matter of moral right and wrong. To evaluate this proposition, I investigate the correlates and consequences of holding issue attitudes with strong moral conviction across three policy issues in which science is central: combating climate change, labeling genetically modified food, and advancing gene editing therapies. Taken together, I find that people with strong moral conviction can still be persuaded by counter-attitudinal scientific evidence, even as they are more negatively critical of it and of people who endorse a view different than their own. These findings bring additional nuance to our understanding of the role of science in morally charged policy debates, alleviating fears about widespread science rejection and derogation while also pointing to new areas of concern.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798379586010Subjects--Topical Terms:

1009004
Climate change.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Biased assimilationIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

The Role of Moral Conviction in Shaping Public Attitudes About Science and the Environment.
LDR:02874ntm a22003977 4500 001 1152714
005 20241213095539.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798379586010
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30486538
035 $a AAI30486538
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Bayes, Robin Alexandra Xu. $3 1479788
245 1 4 $a The Role of Moral Conviction in Shaping Public Attitudes About Science and the Environment.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (265 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Druckman, James.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northwestern University, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Despite high-profile exemplars in the cases of climate change, childhood vaccination, and the COVID-19 pandemic, public divides over science in the United States are not yet well-understood. Evidence suggests that people's issue positions can color how they engage with the science around the issue, driving them to ignore counter-attitudinal scientific evidence, doubt the credibility of scientists and studies that produce such evidence, and derogate others who hold a different position than their own as ignorant, stupid, or dishonest. In this project, I argue that one factor that may exacerbate these tendencies is moral conviction, or the perception that one's attitude on an issue is a matter of moral right and wrong. To evaluate this proposition, I investigate the correlates and consequences of holding issue attitudes with strong moral conviction across three policy issues in which science is central: combating climate change, labeling genetically modified food, and advancing gene editing therapies. Taken together, I find that people with strong moral conviction can still be persuaded by counter-attitudinal scientific evidence, even as they are more negatively critical of it and of people who endorse a view different than their own. These findings bring additional nuance to our understanding of the role of science in morally charged policy debates, alleviating fears about widespread science rejection and derogation while also pointing to new areas of concern.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Climate change. $2 bicssc $3 1009004
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 554804
650 4 $a Political science. $3 558774
653 $a Biased assimilation
653 $a Moral conviction
653 $a Policy attitudes
653 $a Public opinion
653 $a Science beliefs
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0404
710 2 $a Northwestern University. $b Political Science. $3 1180890
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-11B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30486538 $z click for full text (PQDT)