國立虎尾科技大學 |

Essays on Reputation and Decision Making.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Essays on Reputation and Decision Making./
作者:	Moore, Molly.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (470 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-12B.
標題:	Behavioral sciences. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798382784267

Essays on Reputation and Decision Making.
Moore, Molly.

Essays on Reputation and Decision Making. - 1 online resource (470 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Harvard University, 2024.

Includes bibliographical references

An extensive literature demonstrates that people care deeply about the impressions they leave on others (Lerner and Tetlock, 1999; Tetlock, 2000, 2002). Decision makers strive to maintain positive reputations and observers reward those who have such positive reputations. Across the following three essays, I explore how observer perceptions of behavior align with-and influence-people's decision making in the domains of ideological disagreement and gender. The first essay tests whether interpersonal concerns are a driver of selective exposure to ideologically-aligned information. Specifically, I develop a social signaling model of selective exposure, which predicts that (1) individuals shift their information selection decisions to signal to observers and (2) observers reward such shifts. This model is tested across five financially-incentivized, pre-registered experiments (N = 3,598), finding that tailoring one's information selection decisions can indeed have strategic value-but only under certain theoretically-predictable conditions. The second essay directly extends these results by developing a psychological model for how engagement with opposing views will be perceived by others-identifying when engagement might lead to interpersonal rewards versus costs. The third essay builds on the foundation that perceptions of others are a key predictor of behavior, but turns the attention to gender. Across fifteen empirical studies (N = 8,979), the third essay documents robust evidence for believed gender differences in social preferences. Specifically, people expect that women are more generous and more equality-oriented-despite finding little to no evidence for differences in behavior between men and women. Additionally, building upon the associative memory literature, this essay provides causal evidence for one source of such beliefs. Taken together, these three essays highlight not only how reputational considerations shape decision making and biases, but also suggests novel mitigation strategies.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798382784267Subjects--Topical Terms:

1148596
Behavioral sciences.
Subjects--Index Terms:

ConflictIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Essays on Reputation and Decision Making.
LDR:03445ntm a22004457 4500 001 1152764
005 20241213095554.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2024 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798382784267
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31294539
035 $a AAI31294539
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Moore, Molly. $3 1479848
245 1 0 $a Essays on Reputation and Decision Making.
264 0 $c 2024
300 $a 1 online resource (470 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Minson, Julia.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Harvard University, 2024.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a An extensive literature demonstrates that people care deeply about the impressions they leave on others (Lerner and Tetlock, 1999; Tetlock, 2000, 2002). Decision makers strive to maintain positive reputations and observers reward those who have such positive reputations. Across the following three essays, I explore how observer perceptions of behavior align with-and influence-people's decision making in the domains of ideological disagreement and gender. The first essay tests whether interpersonal concerns are a driver of selective exposure to ideologically-aligned information. Specifically, I develop a social signaling model of selective exposure, which predicts that (1) individuals shift their information selection decisions to signal to observers and (2) observers reward such shifts. This model is tested across five financially-incentivized, pre-registered experiments (N = 3,598), finding that tailoring one's information selection decisions can indeed have strategic value-but only under certain theoretically-predictable conditions. The second essay directly extends these results by developing a psychological model for how engagement with opposing views will be perceived by others-identifying when engagement might lead to interpersonal rewards versus costs. The third essay builds on the foundation that perceptions of others are a key predictor of behavior, but turns the attention to gender. Across fifteen empirical studies (N = 8,979), the third essay documents robust evidence for believed gender differences in social preferences. Specifically, people expect that women are more generous and more equality-oriented-despite finding little to no evidence for differences in behavior between men and women. Additionally, building upon the associative memory literature, this essay provides causal evidence for one source of such beliefs. Taken together, these three essays highlight not only how reputational considerations shape decision making and biases, but also suggests novel mitigation strategies.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Behavioral sciences. $3 1148596
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 554804
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 1002398
653 $a Conflict
653 $a Gender
653 $a Impression management
653 $a Judgment
653 $a Reputation
653 $a Selective exposure
653 $a Decision making
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0602
690 $a 0501
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0511
690 $a 0630
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Harvard University. $b Public Policy. $3 1189378
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-12B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31294539 $z click for full text (PQDT)