國立虎尾科技大學 |

Rethinking the Needham question = a non-Eurocentric framework transcending dialogism /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Rethinking the Needham question/ by Raymond W. K. Lau.
其他題名:	a non-Eurocentric framework transcending dialogism /
作者:	Lau, Raymond W. K.
出版者:	Singapore :Springer Nature Singapore : : 2024.,
面頁冊數:	xvi, 358 p. :ill., digital ; : 24 cm.;
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Science and civilization. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9472-0
ISBN:	9789819794720

Rethinking the Needham question = a non-Eurocentric framework transcending dialogism /
Lau, Raymond W. K.

Rethinking the Needham questiona non-Eurocentric framework transcending dialogism /[electronic resource] :by Raymond W. K. Lau. - Singapore :Springer Nature Singapore :2024. - xvi, 358 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Chapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: The Needham Question, dialogism versus Eurocentrism and neo-Eurocentrism, and the need to transcend dialogism -- Chapter 3: Analyzing intellectual development on a non-essentialist basis: A theoretical-methodological framework -- Chapter 4: Greece and the Needham Question -- Chapter 5: Social essentialism and sociological reductionism concerning Greece in comparison to China -- Chapter 6: The issue of evidence of knowledge transmission across different civilizations -- Chapter 7: Alleged 'cultural obstacles' to knowledge transmission and Huff's 'intellectual curiosity' argument -- Chapter 8: Late-Renaissance scholar agency and the breakthrough into modern science -- Chapter 9: Cultural essentialism and Cohen's Eurocentric-cum-neo-Eurocentric argument concerning the breakthrough into modern science -- Chapter 10: Conclusion -- Chapter 11: Appendix - Deconstructing cultural essentialism at root: The 'maritime vs continental civilizations' narrative.

This book offers a new investigation of the Needham Question. Why did modern science emerge in Europe, but not in any of the advanced non-European civilizations? Eurocentric accounts attribute it to certain 'qualities' said to be 'unique' to Europe. Opposed to the Eurocentric view is a position known as the 'dialogical perspective'. Dialogism argues that Europe borrowed heavily from non-European scientific knowledges, and that scientific exchanges were key to the development of modern science. Neo-Eurocentric arguments have emerged in response to the challenge of dialogism, and the debate between Eurocentrism/neo-Eurocentrism and dialogism currently stands at a stalemate. In this book, Raymond Lau brings a new theoretical-methodological framework to finally settle this debate. The historical analysis developed here shows that to secure the non-Eurocentric case, and decisively rebut Eurocentrism and neo-Eurocentrism, it is necessary to go beyond dialogism both theoretically and methodologically. Raymond W.K. Lau, PhD, was Professor of Sociology at the Hong Kong Metropolitan University until retirement in 2017; he is currently Visiting Senior Research Fellow at the Hong Kong Shue Yan University. He has published primary research on the philosophies of Xunzi, Laozi, and Zhuangzi. In Intellectual Developments in Greece and China: Contingency, Institutionalization and Path Dependency (2020), he formulated a theoretical-methodological framework for analyzing intellectual development on a non-essentialist basis, which also underpins the present work. His research into the Needham Question is an extension from that previous work. He is a co-editor and contributor to the volume titled Multicultural Exchanges in the Making of Modern Science: Needham's Dialogical Vision (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024)

ISBN: 9789819794720

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-981-97-9472-0doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

578045
Science and civilization.

LC Class. No.: CB478

Dewey Class. No.: 303.483

Rethinking the Needham question = a non-Eurocentric framework transcending dialogism /
LDR:03810nam a2200325 a 4500 001 1154272
003 DE-He213
005 20241224115236.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 250619s2024 si s 0 eng d
020 $a 9789819794720 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9789819794713 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-981-97-9472-0 $2 doi
035 $a 978-981-97-9472-0
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a CB478
072 7 $a JF $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SOC000000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JB $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 303.483 $2 23
090 $a CB478 $b .L366 2024
100 1 $a Lau, Raymond W. K. $3 1481997
245 1 0 $a Rethinking the Needham question $h [electronic resource] : $b a non-Eurocentric framework transcending dialogism / $c by Raymond W. K. Lau.
260 $a Singapore : $c 2024. $b Springer Nature Singapore : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan,
300 $a xvi, 358 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a Chapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: The Needham Question, dialogism versus Eurocentrism and neo-Eurocentrism, and the need to transcend dialogism -- Chapter 3: Analyzing intellectual development on a non-essentialist basis: A theoretical-methodological framework -- Chapter 4: Greece and the Needham Question -- Chapter 5: Social essentialism and sociological reductionism concerning Greece in comparison to China -- Chapter 6: The issue of evidence of knowledge transmission across different civilizations -- Chapter 7: Alleged 'cultural obstacles' to knowledge transmission and Huff's 'intellectual curiosity' argument -- Chapter 8: Late-Renaissance scholar agency and the breakthrough into modern science -- Chapter 9: Cultural essentialism and Cohen's Eurocentric-cum-neo-Eurocentric argument concerning the breakthrough into modern science -- Chapter 10: Conclusion -- Chapter 11: Appendix - Deconstructing cultural essentialism at root: The 'maritime vs continental civilizations' narrative.
520 $a This book offers a new investigation of the Needham Question. Why did modern science emerge in Europe, but not in any of the advanced non-European civilizations? Eurocentric accounts attribute it to certain 'qualities' said to be 'unique' to Europe. Opposed to the Eurocentric view is a position known as the 'dialogical perspective'. Dialogism argues that Europe borrowed heavily from non-European scientific knowledges, and that scientific exchanges were key to the development of modern science. Neo-Eurocentric arguments have emerged in response to the challenge of dialogism, and the debate between Eurocentrism/neo-Eurocentrism and dialogism currently stands at a stalemate. In this book, Raymond Lau brings a new theoretical-methodological framework to finally settle this debate. The historical analysis developed here shows that to secure the non-Eurocentric case, and decisively rebut Eurocentrism and neo-Eurocentrism, it is necessary to go beyond dialogism both theoretically and methodologically. Raymond W.K. Lau, PhD, was Professor of Sociology at the Hong Kong Metropolitan University until retirement in 2017; he is currently Visiting Senior Research Fellow at the Hong Kong Shue Yan University. He has published primary research on the philosophies of Xunzi, Laozi, and Zhuangzi. In Intellectual Developments in Greece and China: Contingency, Institutionalization and Path Dependency (2020), he formulated a theoretical-methodological framework for analyzing intellectual development on a non-essentialist basis, which also underpins the present work. His research into the Needham Question is an extension from that previous work. He is a co-editor and contributor to the volume titled Multicultural Exchanges in the Making of Modern Science: Needham's Dialogical Vision (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024)
650 0 $a Science and civilization. $3 578045
650 0 $a Science $x History. $3 593006
650 1 4 $a Science and Technology Studies. $3 1140135
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Science. $3 668204
650 2 4 $a History of Science. $3 671541
650 2 4 $a Sociology of Science. $3 1387805
650 2 4 $a Sociology of Knowledge and Discourse. $3 1365780
650 2 4 $a World History, Global and Transnational History. $3 1104930
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9472-0
950 $a Social Sciences (SpringerNature-41176)