國立虎尾科技大學 |

Evaluating the Effects of 6-day and 7-day Fixed-time Artificial Insemination Protocols Using Sex-sorted Semen on Pregnancy in Beef Cattle /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Evaluating the Effects of 6-day and 7-day Fixed-time Artificial Insemination Protocols Using Sex-sorted Semen on Pregnancy in Beef Cattle // Nicole Noel Noga.
作者:	Noga, Nicole Noel,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (76 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International85-12.
標題:	Physiology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31242953
ISBN:	9798382797700

Evaluating the Effects of 6-day and 7-day Fixed-time Artificial Insemination Protocols Using Sex-sorted Semen on Pregnancy in Beef Cattle /
Noga, Nicole Noel,

Evaluating the Effects of 6-day and 7-day Fixed-time Artificial Insemination Protocols Using Sex-sorted Semen on Pregnancy in Beef Cattle /Nicole Noel Noga. - 1 electronic resource (76 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12.

In this study, 527 beef heifers from three locations across two states were enrolled between November 2020 and May 2021 for experiment 1, divided into three sub-experiments: 1A (n = 85), 1B (n = 383), and 1C (n = 59). These heifers were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups. Treatments 1 and 2 involved a 6-day CO-Synch + CIDR protocol, including administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH; 100 μg IM; Factrel; Zoetis Animal Health, Parssipany, NJ) and a CIDR insert (EAZI-BREED CIDR; 1.38g P4; Zoetis Animal Health) on Day 0, followed by prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α; 25 mg IM; Lutalyse HighCon; Zoetis Animal Health) on Day 6, with fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) occurring 72 h for Treatment 1 and 80 h for Treatment 2 later. Treatments 3 and 4 followed a 7-day CO-Synch + CIDR protocol with similar initial steps but differed in the timing of FTAI, occurring 54 h (Treatment 3) or 62 h (Treatment 4) after PGF2α administration. Each location in the study was evaluated individually to account for environmental differences. The analysis used GLIMMIX procedures of SAS, including hour as the fixed effect and sheath code, sire, and technician as covariables. Significance was declared at P ≤ 0.05 and tendencies at 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10. In experiment 1A, no significant difference was found between treatments 1 and 2 (P = 0.44), while a tendency for higher pregnancy to AI (P/AI) rates was observed in treatment 4 compared to 3 (P = 0.10). Experiment 1B showed no significant differences between treatments 1 and 2 (P = 0.84) or between 3 and 4 (P = 0.63). In 1C, treatment 2 tended to have a higher P/AI rate than treatment 1 (P = 0.07), with no statistical difference between treatments 3 and 4 (P = 0.33).Experiment 2 involved 240 crossbred beef cows from two locations, randomized into the same four treatments. In experiment 2A, among 189 cows, Treatment 1 had a P/AI rate of 63.04%(29/46), significantly higher than Treatment 2 at 40.81% (20/49) (P = 0.03). No statistical difference was observed between treatments 3 (57.44%, 27/47) and 4 (51.06%, 24/47) (P = 0.53). In experiment 2B with 51 cows, Treatment 1 achieved a P/AI rate of 76.9% (10/13) and Treatment 2 had 53.8% (7/13), with no significant difference (P = 0.22). Similarly, Treatment 3 (76.9%, 10/13) and Treatment 4 (75.0%, 9/12) showed no statistical difference (P = 0.87).This study provides insights into the efficacy of different treatment protocols for enhancing pregnancy rates following AI in beef heifers and cows, emphasizing the potential influence of treatment specifics on reproductive success.

English

ISBN: 9798382797700Subjects--Topical Terms:

673386
Physiology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Artificial insemination

Evaluating the Effects of 6-day and 7-day Fixed-time Artificial Insemination Protocols Using Sex-sorted Semen on Pregnancy in Beef Cattle /
LDR:04086nam a22004333i 4500 001 1157783
005 20250603111414.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 250804s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798382797700
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31242953
035 $a AAI31242953
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Noga, Nicole Noel, $e author. $3 1484054
245 1 0 $a Evaluating the Effects of 6-day and 7-day Fixed-time Artificial Insemination Protocols Using Sex-sorted Semen on Pregnancy in Beef Cattle / $c Nicole Noel Noga.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (76 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12.
500 $a Advisors: Looney, Charles R. Committee members: Coffey, Ken; Powell, Jeremy.
502 $b M.S. $c University of Arkansas $d 2024.
520 $a In this study, 527 beef heifers from three locations across two states were enrolled between November 2020 and May 2021 for experiment 1, divided into three sub-experiments: 1A (n = 85), 1B (n = 383), and 1C (n = 59). These heifers were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups. Treatments 1 and 2 involved a 6-day CO-Synch + CIDR protocol, including administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH; 100 μg IM; Factrel; Zoetis Animal Health, Parssipany, NJ) and a CIDR insert (EAZI-BREED CIDR; 1.38g P4; Zoetis Animal Health) on Day 0, followed by prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α; 25 mg IM; Lutalyse HighCon; Zoetis Animal Health) on Day 6, with fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) occurring 72 h for Treatment 1 and 80 h for Treatment 2 later. Treatments 3 and 4 followed a 7-day CO-Synch + CIDR protocol with similar initial steps but differed in the timing of FTAI, occurring 54 h (Treatment 3) or 62 h (Treatment 4) after PGF2α administration. Each location in the study was evaluated individually to account for environmental differences. The analysis used GLIMMIX procedures of SAS, including hour as the fixed effect and sheath code, sire, and technician as covariables. Significance was declared at P ≤ 0.05 and tendencies at 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10. In experiment 1A, no significant difference was found between treatments 1 and 2 (P = 0.44), while a tendency for higher pregnancy to AI (P/AI) rates was observed in treatment 4 compared to 3 (P = 0.10). Experiment 1B showed no significant differences between treatments 1 and 2 (P = 0.84) or between 3 and 4 (P = 0.63). In 1C, treatment 2 tended to have a higher P/AI rate than treatment 1 (P = 0.07), with no statistical difference between treatments 3 and 4 (P = 0.33).Experiment 2 involved 240 crossbred beef cows from two locations, randomized into the same four treatments. In experiment 2A, among 189 cows, Treatment 1 had a P/AI rate of 63.04%(29/46), significantly higher than Treatment 2 at 40.81% (20/49) (P = 0.03). No statistical difference was observed between treatments 3 (57.44%, 27/47) and 4 (51.06%, 24/47) (P = 0.53). In experiment 2B with 51 cows, Treatment 1 achieved a P/AI rate of 76.9% (10/13) and Treatment 2 had 53.8% (7/13), with no significant difference (P = 0.22). Similarly, Treatment 3 (76.9%, 10/13) and Treatment 4 (75.0%, 9/12) showed no statistical difference (P = 0.87).This study provides insights into the efficacy of different treatment protocols for enhancing pregnancy rates following AI in beef heifers and cows, emphasizing the potential influence of treatment specifics on reproductive success.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0011
650 4 $a Physiology. $3 673386
650 4 $a Agriculture. $3 660421
650 4 $a Animal sciences. $3 1178863
653 $a Artificial insemination
653 $a Beef
653 $a Cattle
653 $a Hormones
653 $a Reproduction
690 $a 0475
690 $a 0473
690 $a 0719
710 2 $a University of Arkansas. $b Animal Science. $3 1179831
720 1 $a Looney, Charles R. $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 85-12.
790 $a 0011
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31242953