國立虎尾科技大學 |

The Truth, the Lie, and the AI: Credibility of AI Analyses of Deception Transcripts /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Truth, the Lie, and the AI: Credibility of AI Analyses of Deception Transcripts // Rinoa Wong.
作者:	Wong, Rinoa,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (35 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International85-12.
標題:	Information technology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31299325
ISBN:	9798382832449

The Truth, the Lie, and the AI: Credibility of AI Analyses of Deception Transcripts /
Wong, Rinoa,

The Truth, the Lie, and the AI: Credibility of AI Analyses of Deception Transcripts /Rinoa Wong. - 1 electronic resource (35 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12.

The increasing use of AI for communication analyzation raises ethical concerns and questions about its trustworthiness. While human-like features and emotional intelligence in AI could build trust, it might also lead to an overreliance on machines due to a perceived "Machine Heuristic" of trustworthiness. This study explored AI credibility in deception. One-hundred ninety-nine participants judged the truthfulness of transcripts analyzed by AI, but where participants were randomly assigned to believing they were analyzed by either FBI agents, or students. The results showed that there were no differences in perceived trust between the analyzers. However, participants were better at detecting lies, especially when the analysis was labeled AI or FBI. The analyzer type (AI vs. human) also influenced accuracy, such that men overall judged statements as more trustworthy. These findings highlight the complexities of AI credibility and its impact on decision-making. As AI becomes more prominent, understanding its influence on human behavior, particularly judgment and social interactions, is crucial.

English

ISBN: 9798382832449Subjects--Topical Terms:

559429
Information technology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Trustworthiness

The Truth, the Lie, and the AI: Credibility of AI Analyses of Deception Transcripts /
LDR:02541nam a22004453i 4500 001 1157802
005 20250603111418.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 250804s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798382832449
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31299325
035 $a AAI31299325
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Wong, Rinoa, $e author. $3 1484076
245 1 0 $a The Truth, the Lie, and the AI: Credibility of AI Analyses of Deception Transcripts / $c Rinoa Wong.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (35 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12.
500 $a Advisors: Frank, Mark Committee members: Lee, David.
502 $b M.A. $c State University of New York at Buffalo $d 2024.
520 $a The increasing use of AI for communication analyzation raises ethical concerns and questions about its trustworthiness. While human-like features and emotional intelligence in AI could build trust, it might also lead to an overreliance on machines due to a perceived "Machine Heuristic" of trustworthiness. This study explored AI credibility in deception. One-hundred ninety-nine participants judged the truthfulness of transcripts analyzed by AI, but where participants were randomly assigned to believing they were analyzed by either FBI agents, or students. The results showed that there were no differences in perceived trust between the analyzers. However, participants were better at detecting lies, especially when the analysis was labeled AI or FBI. The analyzer type (AI vs. human) also influenced accuracy, such that men overall judged statements as more trustworthy. These findings highlight the complexities of AI credibility and its impact on decision-making. As AI becomes more prominent, understanding its influence on human behavior, particularly judgment and social interactions, is crucial.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0656
650 4 $a Information technology. $3 559429
650 4 $a Communication. $3 556422
653 $a Trustworthiness
653 $a Emotional intelligence
653 $a Credibility
653 $a Deception
653 $a Influence
653 $a Truth
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0489
690 $a 0800
710 2 $a State University of New York at Buffalo. $b Communication. $3 1181482
720 1 $a Frank, Mark $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 85-12.
790 $a 0656
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31299325